A survey of recent writings in early-modern, largely European, diplomatic history reveals important shifts in the direction of the cultural and sociological emphasis favored by the proponents of New Diplomatic History. In turn, the shifts have brought mainstream diplomatic historians closer to other subfields – gender and class history, in particular. The trend is likely to continue.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 567 | 0 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 556 | 127 | 9 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 785 | 139 | 9 |
A survey of recent writings in early-modern, largely European, diplomatic history reveals important shifts in the direction of the cultural and sociological emphasis favored by the proponents of New Diplomatic History. In turn, the shifts have brought mainstream diplomatic historians closer to other subfields – gender and class history, in particular. The trend is likely to continue.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 567 | 0 | 0 |
Full Text Views | 556 | 127 | 9 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 785 | 139 | 9 |