Sociology of the Present: Reading Dostoevsky’s The Idiot Through a Hegelian Lens
In: The Dostoevsky JournalSearch for other papers by Nicholas Ulbrick in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article takes Hegel’s Lectures on the Philosophy of History as an analytic framework to interpret Dostoevsky’s representation of a turbulent period of social change in 1860s Russia in his novel The Idiot. The paper shows that Dostoevsky engaged with Hegel’s philosophical constructs and understood them well enough to render them powerfully through artistic form of expression. It leads to the insight that Dostoevsky and Hegel were contemporaries in thought: both sought to create a new reader with a new sensibility about individual and social freedom, emerging in the post-Enlightenment period. Whilst Hegel may not have considered Russia to have entered World History, it is argued that this view was short-sighted and that Dostoevsky’s efforts highlight the complexity and nuance of this period of rapid social and political change in Russia of the 1860s.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Breuilly, J. (1996). The Formation of the First German Nation-State, 1800–1871. London: Macmillan Press Ltd.
-
Comay, R. (2011). Mourning Sickness: Hegel and the French Revolution. California: Stanford University Press.
-
Dostoevsky, F. M. (1917). Letters of Fyodor Michailovitch Dostoevsky to his Family and Friends. (E. C. Mayne, Trans.) London: Chatto & Windus.
-
Dostoevsky, F. M. (1974). The Idiot. Middlesex: Penguin Books.
-
Dostoevsky, F. M. (2008). Demons. (R. A. Maguire, Trans.) London: Penguin Classics.
-
Földényi, L. F. (2020). Dostoevsky Reads Hegel in Siberia and Bursts into Tears. (O. Mulzet, Trans.) Cambridge: Yale Margellos.
-
Foucault, M. (1998). Aesthetics, Method, and Epistemology. (J. D. Faubion, R. Paul, Eds., & R. Hurley, Trans.) New York: The New York Press.
-
Frede, V. (2013). Stankevič and Hegel’s arrival in Russia. Studies in East European Thought, 65 (3–4), 159–174. doi:10.1007/s11212-014-9195-0.
-
Hegel, G. W. (1995). Lectures on the History of Philosophy: Greek Philosophy to Plato (Vol. I). (E. S. Haldane, Trans.) Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
-
Hegel, G. W. (2011). Lectures on the Philosophy of History. (R. Alvarado, Trans.) Aalten: Word Bridge Publishing.
-
Hobsbawm, E. (1997). The Age of Capital. London: Abacus.
-
Hollander, R. (1974). The Apocalyptic Framework of Dostoevsky’s “The Idiot”. Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal, 7 (2), 123–139.
-
Kliger, I. (2013). Hegel’s political philosophy and the social imaginary of early Russian realism. Studies in East European Thought, 65 (3–4), 189–199.
-
Malabou, C. (2005). The Future of Hegel: Plasticity, Temporality and Dialectic. (L. During, Trans.) Oxfordshire: Routledge.
-
Miakinkov, E. (2020). War and Enlightenment in Russia: Military Culture in the age of Catherineii. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
-
Pinkard, T. (2000). Hegel’s Phenomenology and Logic: an overview. In K. Ameriks (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to German Idealism (pp. 161–179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Radzinsky, E. (2005). Alexander II:The Last Great Tsar. (A. W. Bouis, Trans.) New York: Free Press.
-
Vladiv, S. M. (1989). “Dostoevskii’s ‘Positively Beautiful Man’ and the Existentialist Authentic Self – A Comparison”. Canadian-American Slavic Studies, 23 (3), 313029.
-
Vladiv-Glover, S. M. (2019). Dostoevsky and the Realists: Dickens, Flaubert, Tolstoy. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
-
Žižek, S. (2013). Less Than Nothing: Hegel and the shadow of dialectical materialism. London: Verso.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1319 | 1165 | 228 |
| Full Text Views | 202 | 13 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 143 | 5 | 2 |
Sociology of the Present: Reading Dostoevsky’s The Idiot Through a Hegelian Lens
In: The Dostoevsky JournalSearch for other papers by Nicholas Ulbrick in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article takes Hegel’s Lectures on the Philosophy of History as an analytic framework to interpret Dostoevsky’s representation of a turbulent period of social change in 1860s Russia in his novel The Idiot. The paper shows that Dostoevsky engaged with Hegel’s philosophical constructs and understood them well enough to render them powerfully through artistic form of expression. It leads to the insight that Dostoevsky and Hegel were contemporaries in thought: both sought to create a new reader with a new sensibility about individual and social freedom, emerging in the post-Enlightenment period. Whilst Hegel may not have considered Russia to have entered World History, it is argued that this view was short-sighted and that Dostoevsky’s efforts highlight the complexity and nuance of this period of rapid social and political change in Russia of the 1860s.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1319 | 1165 | 228 |
| Full Text Views | 202 | 13 | 5 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 143 | 5 | 2 |
