Save

The Problem of Characterizing the 4QReworked Pentateuch Manuscripts: Bible, Rewritten Bible, or None of the Above?

In: Dead Sea Discoveries
Author:
Molly Zahn Department of eology, University of Notre Dame, 130 Malloy Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556, U.S.A. mzahn1@nd. edu

Search for other papers by Molly Zahn in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

This article engages the problem of whether the five manuscripts classified as 4QReworked Pentateuch (4Q158, 4Q364–367) should be considered extrabiblical compositions or simply expansive copies of the Pentateuch. Since similar methods of reworking scripture appear in both types of text, focusing on the ways scripture is reworked in the 4QRP manuscripts cannot solve the problem. Other criteria such as the literary voice, scope, and coverage of a work are more promising. The fragmentary state of the texts, however, precludes a definitive solution and requires that multiple possibilities be considered.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 331 40 2
Full Text Views 129 1 0
PDF Views & Downloads 72 4 0