This article proves that the title “Midrash Sepher Moshe,” written in Jewish square characters on the verso of the cryptic scroll 4Q249, is the product of a correction. Initially it had been “Sepher Moshe” which was subsequently corrected to “Midrash Moshe.” This is therefore a rare attestation of canonical awareness on the part of Qumran librarians. The terms “midrash” and “sepher” are discussed accordingly. In addition, the paleography of this title is submitted to close scrutiny, proving that the dating of these words to the early second century b.c.e. in not substantiated. Rather, both the first and second hands should be dated to around 100 b.c.e. like many other scrolls. This fresh analysis has important consequences for the dating of the entire cryptic corpus, which is not as early as previously suggested.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
S. J. Pfann, “249a-z and 250a-j: Introduction,” in Qumran Cave 4 XXVI Cryptic Texts and Miscellanea, Part 1 (djd 36; ed. P. Alexander et al.; Oxford: Clarendon, 2000), 515–33, here 523.
S. J. Pfann and M. Kister, “298. Words of the Maskil to all Sons of Dawn,” in Qumran Cave 4 XV. Sapiential Texts, Part 1 (djd 20; ed. T. Elgvin et al.; Oxford: Clarendon, 1997) 1–30, here 9.
See G. Doudna, “Dating the Scrolls on the Basis of Radiocarbon Analysis,” in The Dead Sea Scrolls after Fifty Years (ed. P. W. Flint and J. C. VanderKam; Leiden: Brill, 1998), Vol. 1, 430–71.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 250 | 49 | 8 |
Full Text Views | 195 | 1 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 57 | 3 | 0 |
This article proves that the title “Midrash Sepher Moshe,” written in Jewish square characters on the verso of the cryptic scroll 4Q249, is the product of a correction. Initially it had been “Sepher Moshe” which was subsequently corrected to “Midrash Moshe.” This is therefore a rare attestation of canonical awareness on the part of Qumran librarians. The terms “midrash” and “sepher” are discussed accordingly. In addition, the paleography of this title is submitted to close scrutiny, proving that the dating of these words to the early second century b.c.e. in not substantiated. Rather, both the first and second hands should be dated to around 100 b.c.e. like many other scrolls. This fresh analysis has important consequences for the dating of the entire cryptic corpus, which is not as early as previously suggested.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 250 | 49 | 8 |
Full Text Views | 195 | 1 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 57 | 3 | 0 |