This article puts forth a mathematical and astronomical model that helps explain the structure of the Aramaic Astronomical Book (aab; 4Q208–211), in particular the sequences of fractions in 4Q208 and 4Q209. The article confirms and builds upon Drawnel’s reconstruction of this highly formulaic composition. The model proposed here demonstrates that the numerous fractions of the aab, although they seem bewildering and incomprehensible to many readers today, constitute genuine and authentic astronomical knowledge. While there are parallels between the aab and Mesopotamian astronomical texts, especially the Enūma Anu Enlil, they do not necessarily indicate that the author of the aab had direct or extensive access to centers of astronomical knowledge in Babylon.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Józef T. Milik, The Books of Enoch: Aramaic Fragments from Qumran Cave 4 (Oxford: Clarendon, 1976), 273–97; Florentino García Martínez and Eibert J.C. Tigchelaar, “4QAstronomical Enocha–b ar,” in Qumran Cave 4.XXVI: Cryptic Texts and Miscellanea, Part 1 (eds. S.J. Pfann et al.; djd 36; Oxford: Clarendon, 2000), 95–171; Henryk Drawnel, The Aramaic Astronomical Book (4Q208–4Q211) from Qumran (Oxford: Clarendon, 2011). The fragments 4Q210 and 4Q211 contain no astronomical information and play no role in this study.
See Table 2.27 for day 15 in Drawnel, The Aramaic Astronomical Book, 148. See also the comment on line 9 of García Martínez and Tigchelaar, djd 36: 139.
James C. VanderKam, “The Aramaic Astronomical Book and the Ethiopic Book of the Luminaries,” in With Wisdom as a Robe: Qumran and Other Jewish Studies in Honour of Ida Fröhlich (eds. K.D. Dobos and M. Kőszeghy; hbm 21; Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2009), 207–21 (212); Ben-Dov, The Head of All Years, 132.
See, for example, VanderKam, 1 Enoch 2, 383; Albani, Astronomie und Schöpfungsglaube, 270; Drawnel, The Aramaic Astronomical Book, 301; Otto Neugebauer, in Black, The Book of Enoch, 387; P.S. Alexander, “Enoch and the Beginnings of Jewish Interest in Natural Science,” in The Wisdom Texts from Qumran and the Development of Sapiential Thought (eds. C. Hempel, A. Lange and H. Lichtenberger; betl 159; Leuven: Leuven University Press/Peeters, 2002), 223–43 (240); Basil Lourié, “Between Babylonia and Ethiopia: Some Thoughts about a Recent Book on the Qumranic Calendars (Jonathan Ben-Dov, Head of All Years, Astronomy and Calendars at Qumran and Their Ancient Context),” Scrinium: Revue de patrologie, d’hagiographie critique et d’histoire ecclésiastique 6 (2010): 413–32. It should also be mentioned that astronomic traditions found in the AAB and the Enochic Astronomical Book are preserved and adapted in Hebrew texts from Qumran, such as 4Q317, 4Q503 and perhaps 4Q334. See Ben-Dov, Head of All Years, 76, 132–46. He has also argued (231–39) that a different type of Babylonian astronomical learning known as Lunar Three is evident in 4Q320, 4Q321 and 4Q321a. See Jonathan Ben-Dov and Wayne Horowitz, “The Babylonian Lunar Three and Calendrical Scrolls from Qumran,” za 95 (2005): 104–20.
Drawnel, The Aramaic Astronomical Book, 53, 301. He has argued that this learning was continued within Judaism in a priestly milieu, as has Albani, Astronomie und Schöpfungsglaube, 261. See also Drawnel, “Priestly Education in the Aramaic Levi Document (Visions of Levi) and the Aramaic Astronomical Book (4Q208–211),” RevQ 22 (2006): 547–74.
Popović, “Networks of Scholars,” 171. For an example of two scribal families who copied and preserved numerous tablets, including the eae and other astronomical texts (the descendants of Shangû-Ninurta and the sons of Ekur-Zākir), see Drawnel, The Aramaic Astronomical Book, 55. See also Eleanor Robson, “The Production and Dissemination of Scholarly Knowledge,” in The Oxford Handbook of Cuneiform Culture (eds. K. Radner and E. Robson; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), 557–76 (560, 571).
Popović, “Networks of Scholars,” 169–70. On evidence for Aramaic scribes in the Neo-Assyrian courts, see Ben-Dov, Head of All Years, 261. He mentions one tablet (saa VII §213) that records that a scribe with an Aramaic-sounding name (Ṭabiya) sent an astronomical report on a cuneiform tablet from Babylon to Nineveh. See also Philippe Clancier, “Cuneiform Culture’s Last Guardians: The Old Urban Notability of Hellenistic Uruk,” in The Oxford Handbook of Cuneiform Culture, 752–73 (764–66).
Popović, “Networks of Scholars,” 178–81; A. Jones, “The Adaptation of Babylonian Methods in Greek Numerical Astronomy,” Isis 82 (1991): 441–53; Neugebauer, The Exact Sciences in Antiquity, 145.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 428 | 76 | 23 |
Full Text Views | 253 | 1 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 37 | 4 | 1 |
This article puts forth a mathematical and astronomical model that helps explain the structure of the Aramaic Astronomical Book (aab; 4Q208–211), in particular the sequences of fractions in 4Q208 and 4Q209. The article confirms and builds upon Drawnel’s reconstruction of this highly formulaic composition. The model proposed here demonstrates that the numerous fractions of the aab, although they seem bewildering and incomprehensible to many readers today, constitute genuine and authentic astronomical knowledge. While there are parallels between the aab and Mesopotamian astronomical texts, especially the Enūma Anu Enlil, they do not necessarily indicate that the author of the aab had direct or extensive access to centers of astronomical knowledge in Babylon.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 428 | 76 | 23 |
Full Text Views | 253 | 1 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 37 | 4 | 1 |