Digital technology significantly expands the resources available to scholars seeking to reconstruct ancient manuscripts and, in combination with conventional philology, contributes to a more accurate reconstruction of both the text and the line breaks of col. 2 of the Temple Scroll. The column’s fragmentary condition led Yadin and Qimron to diverge in their reconstructions of the manuscript’s line-breaks and its lacunae. The problem is most acute at 2:8–9, where the scroll’s composer expanded the base text of Exod 34 with Deut 7:25–26. By employing techniques of digital mapping in conjunction with historical syntax, this article helps reconstruct the column’s line-breaks, helps restore the lacunae, and offers a refined reconstruction of the column.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Crawford, Temple Scroll, 12. Crawford cites Yadin, who argued that Scribe B was responsible for cols. 6–66, which “reflects the medial Herodian,” while the script of Scribe A (cols. 1–5) is “of the developed Herodian mode” (Yadin, Temple Scroll, 1:18).
Steudel, “Tempelrolle,” 6. Consistent with the study edition format, Steudel does not note or comment on the line-break adjustment.
Zuckerman, “Dynamics of Change in the Computer Imaging,” 13–19.
Yadin, Temple Scroll 2:2–3. Steudel follows Yadin here (“Tempelrolle,” 6).
Qimron, “מגילת המקדש,” 141. Qimron is followed by Riska (Temple Scroll, 35), and tentatively followed by Schiffman (Temple Scroll, 14).
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 647 | 168 | 12 |
Full Text Views | 241 | 6 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 71 | 9 | 0 |
Digital technology significantly expands the resources available to scholars seeking to reconstruct ancient manuscripts and, in combination with conventional philology, contributes to a more accurate reconstruction of both the text and the line breaks of col. 2 of the Temple Scroll. The column’s fragmentary condition led Yadin and Qimron to diverge in their reconstructions of the manuscript’s line-breaks and its lacunae. The problem is most acute at 2:8–9, where the scroll’s composer expanded the base text of Exod 34 with Deut 7:25–26. By employing techniques of digital mapping in conjunction with historical syntax, this article helps reconstruct the column’s line-breaks, helps restore the lacunae, and offers a refined reconstruction of the column.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 647 | 168 | 12 |
Full Text Views | 241 | 6 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 71 | 9 | 0 |