This article offers a brief response to a recent article by Eshbal Ratzon, in which she is critical of an article we published in dsd on the Aramaic Astronomical Book in 2014. Ratzon raised several methodological issues with respect to our essay. In this response we attempt to clarify the relationship of our paper to those issues.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 903 | 689 | 135 |
Full Text Views | 182 | 4 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 40 | 1 | 0 |
This article offers a brief response to a recent article by Eshbal Ratzon, in which she is critical of an article we published in dsd on the Aramaic Astronomical Book in 2014. Ratzon raised several methodological issues with respect to our essay. In this response we attempt to clarify the relationship of our paper to those issues.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 903 | 689 | 135 |
Full Text Views | 182 | 4 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 40 | 1 | 0 |