The article discerns in both Qumranic sources and in those coming from the nascent Jesus movement responses to their shared experience of disappointment vis-à-vis postponement of the expected redemption. The discussion, focusing on 1QpHab and a number of New Testament epistles, highlights the usage in this context of the language of God’s mystery, standing for reinterpretation of redemption-centered prophecies and their adjustment to a new timetable. While no clear direct links can be posited, the comparative study of the texts independently penned within the two eschatological groups allows to single out an underlying more general late Second Temple religious pattern of coping with delay in the anticipated end-of-days deliverance.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
D. Flusser, “The Stages of Redemption History according to John the Baptist and Jesus,” in Jesus (with R. S. Notley; Jerusalem: Magnes, 2001), 258–75. See also idem, “The Kingdom of Heaven,” in The Sage from Galilee: Rediscovering Jesus’ Genius (Grand Rapids; Eerdmans, 2007), 76–96.
The English translation follows E. Isaac, “(Ethiopic Apocalypse of) Enoch (Second Century B.C.–First Century A.D.),” in Apocalyptic Literature and Testaments, vol. 1 of The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha(ed. J. H. Charlesworth; Peabody: Hendrickson, 1983), 5–89.
See discussion in D. J. Harrington, “Mystery,” in Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls (ed. L. H. Schiffman and J. C. VanderKam; 2 vols.; New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 1:590–91.
See E. W. Larson, “Mysteries,” in Encyclopedia of the Dead Sea Scrolls, 1:587. See also L. H. Schiffman, Reclaiming the Dead Sea Scrolls: The History of Judaism, the Background of Christianity, the Lost Library of Qumran(Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1994), 206–10.
J. Jokiranta, Social Identity and Sectarianism in the Qumran Movement (Leiden: Brill, 2012), 165.
See M. P. Horgan, Pesharim: Qumran Interpretations of Biblical Books (Washington: Catholic Biblical Association of America, 1979), 229, 244–47.
See Nitzan, Pesher Habakkuk, 27; Brownlee, The Midrash Pesher of Habakkuk, 107–13.
But cf. Brownlee, The Midrash Pesher of Habakkuk, 116. Cf. J. J. Collins, “Prophecy and Fulfillment in the Qumran Scrolls,” in idem, Seers, Sybils and Sages in Hellenistic Judaism (Leiden: Brill, 1997), 301–16 (307).
For a detailed discussion, see S. Ruzer, Mapping the New Testament: Early Christian Writings as a Witness to Jewish Biblical Exegesis (Leiden: Brill, 2007), 179–213.
See discussion in S. Ruzer, “Nascent Christianity between Sectarian and Broader Judaism: Lessons from the Dead Sea Scrolls,” in The Dead Sea Scrolls and Contemporary Culture, ed. A. Roitman, L. H. Schiffman and S. Tzoref (Leiden, Brill, 2010), 477–93. See also K. P. Donfried, “Paul and Judaism: 1 Thessalonians 2:13–16 as a Test Case,” Int 38 (1984): 242–53; J. C. Hurd, “Paul Ahead of His Time: 1 Thess. 2:13–16,” in Paul and the Gospels, vol. 1 of Anti-Judaism in Early Christianity, ed. P. Richardson et al. (Montreal, qc: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 1986), 21–35, esp. 33–35; G. E. Okeke, “1 Thessalonians 2. 13–16: The Fate of the Unbelieving Jews,” nts 27 (1981): 127–36 (130–31).
See Perrin and Duling, The New Testament: An Introduction, 208.
See S. Ruzer, “Paul’s Stance on the Torah Revisited: Gentile Addressees and the Jewish Setting,” in Paul’s Jewish Matrix, ed. T. G. Casey and J. Taylor (Rome: Gregorian & Biblical, 2011), 75–97 (83–84).
See K. Stendahl, Final Account: Paul’s Letter to the Romans (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995).
Cf. Perrin and Duling, The New Testament: An Introduction, 187.
See J. A. Fitzmyer, Romans: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. The Anchor Yale Bible (New York: Doubleday, 1992), 576–81.
But cf. Fitzmyer, Romans, 618–19; T. Holtz, “The Judgment on the Jews and the Salvation of All Israel: 1 Thess 2,15–16 and Rom 11,25–26,” in The Thessalonian Correspondence, 284–94 (290–91).
But cf. Holtz, “The Judgment on the Jews,” 291. Presenting the saying in Rom 11:25–26 as “the end of a long reflection on Israel’s fate in the light of the revelation of the gospel” (page 288), Holtz’s article insists on the lack of real development in Paul’s thought, attempting to harmonize 1 Thess 2:15–16 and Rom 11:25–26. See also S. Kim, “The ‘Mystery’ of Rom. 11.25–26 Once More,” nts 43 (1997): 412–29, who likewise rejects the idea of a change in Paul’s thinking derived from the actual missionary situation, arguing instead that the mystery of “Gentiles first” had been revealed to Paul already in his Damascus road experience.
See discussion in D. Flusser, “The Dead Sea Sect and Pre-Pauline Christianity,” in Judaism and the Origins of Christianity, 23–74.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 335 | 32 | 12 |
Full Text Views | 226 | 3 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 117 | 12 | 0 |
The article discerns in both Qumranic sources and in those coming from the nascent Jesus movement responses to their shared experience of disappointment vis-à-vis postponement of the expected redemption. The discussion, focusing on 1QpHab and a number of New Testament epistles, highlights the usage in this context of the language of God’s mystery, standing for reinterpretation of redemption-centered prophecies and their adjustment to a new timetable. While no clear direct links can be posited, the comparative study of the texts independently penned within the two eschatological groups allows to single out an underlying more general late Second Temple religious pattern of coping with delay in the anticipated end-of-days deliverance.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 335 | 32 | 12 |
Full Text Views | 226 | 3 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 117 | 12 | 0 |