Temple Ideology and Hellenistic Private Associations
In: Dead Sea DiscoveriesSearch for other papers by Benedikt Eckhardt in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Soon after the discovery of 1QS, comparisons with private associations from the Hellenistic and Roman world were suggested. There are clearly some parallels in internal organization. However, scholars using this comparison to explain features of the yaḥad have rarely taken the environment that made associations in the Hellenistic world possible into account. By way of a comparison of attitudes towards temples, this article seeks to reintroduce the social context of private associations into the debate. While Hellenistic associations can be said to have developed temple ideologies not dissimilar to certain features of the yaḥad, the conditions, aims and implications of those respective ideologies were fundamentally different. This has obvious implications for understanding the social identity of members, and should caution against decontextualized comparisons.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 357 | 105 | 11 |
| Full Text Views | 409 | 10 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 252 | 19 | 0 |
Temple Ideology and Hellenistic Private Associations
In: Dead Sea DiscoveriesSearch for other papers by Benedikt Eckhardt in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Soon after the discovery of 1QS, comparisons with private associations from the Hellenistic and Roman world were suggested. There are clearly some parallels in internal organization. However, scholars using this comparison to explain features of the yaḥad have rarely taken the environment that made associations in the Hellenistic world possible into account. By way of a comparison of attitudes towards temples, this article seeks to reintroduce the social context of private associations into the debate. While Hellenistic associations can be said to have developed temple ideologies not dissimilar to certain features of the yaḥad, the conditions, aims and implications of those respective ideologies were fundamentally different. This has obvious implications for understanding the social identity of members, and should caution against decontextualized comparisons.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 357 | 105 | 11 |
| Full Text Views | 409 | 10 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 252 | 19 | 0 |