Sectarian Marital Practice: Rethinking the Role of Sexuality in the Dead Sea Scrolls

in Dead Sea Discoveries

Abstract

Dead Sea Scrolls scholarship has historically emphasized a binary between the celibate yaḥad of the Community Rule and the marrying edah of the Damascus Document and Rule of the Congregation. An early focus on celibacy has given way in recent years to arguments for the near ubiquity of marriage in the scrolls movement. In place of dichotomies of marriage and celibacy, the complexities of sexuality in the scrolls are best understood in terms of a sexually-limiting sectarian marital practice. This marital practice is grounded in a theology of perfection and is best understood in light of sociological approaches to the evidence in the scrolls. In addition to better explaining the evidence for sexuality in the scrolls, a reading from this perspective may, potentially, shed light on the perennial question of whether the movement began with marriage or celibacy as its prevailing social norm.

  • AtkinsonKenneth and Jodi Magness. “Josephus’s Essenes and the Qumran Community.” JBL 129 (2010): 317342.

  • BarrettMichèle and Anne Phillips eds. Destabilizing Theory: Contemporary Feminist Debates. Stanford: Stanford University Press1992.

  • BaumgartenAlbert. “Graeco-Roman Voluntary Associations and Ancient Jewish Sects.” Pages 93112 in Jews in the Graeco-Roman World. Edited by Martin Goodman. Oxford: Clarendon Press1998.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BaumgartenAlbert. “Who Cares and Why Does it Matter? Qumran and the Essenes, Once Again!DSD 11 (2004): 174211.

  • BoyarinDaniel. Carnal Israel: Reading Sex in Talmudic Culture. Berkeley: University of California Press1993.

  • ChalcraftDavid J.Social Scientific Approaches: a. Sectarianism.” Pages 3741 in T&T Clark Companion to the Dead Sea Scrolls. Edited by George J. Brooke and Charlotte Hempel. New York: T&T Clark2019.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CollinsJohn J. Beyond the Qumran Community: The Sectarian Movement of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans2010.

  • CrawfordSidnie Ann White. “A Comparison of the ‘A’ and ‘B’ Manuscripts of the Damascus Document.” RevQ 12 (1987): 537553.

  • FonrobertCharlotte Elisheva. Menstrual Purity: Rabbinic and Christian Reconstructions of Biblical Gender. Stanford: Stanford University Press2000.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GrossmanMaxine L.Women and Men in the Rule of the Congregation: A Feminist Critical Assessment.” Pages 229245 in Rediscovering the Dead Sea Scrolls: An Assessment of Old and New Approaches and Methods. Edited by Maxine L. Grossman. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans2010.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GrossmanMaxine L.The World of Qumran and the Sectarian Dead Sea Scrolls in Gendered Perspective.” Pages 225246 in Early Jewish Writings. Edited by Eileen Schuller and Marie-Theres Wacker. BW 3.1. Atlanta: SBL Press2017.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GrossmanMaxine L.Queerly Sectarian: Jewish Difference, the Dead Sea Scrolls, and Marital Disciplines.” Journal of Jewish Identities 11 (2018): 87105.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HachliliRachel. “The Qumran Cemetery Reassessed.” Pages 4678 in The Oxford Handbook of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Edited by Timothy H. Lim and John J. Collins. New York: Oxford University Press2010.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HayesChristine E. Gentile Impurities and Jewish Identities: Intermarriage and Conversion from the Bible to the Talmud. New York: Oxford2002.

  • JacobusHelen R.Calendars.” Pages 435448 in T&T Clark Companion to the Dead Sea Scrolls. Edited by George J. Brooke and Charlotte Hempel. New York: T&T Clark2019.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JokirantaJutta. “Social-Scientific Approaches to the Dead Sea Scrolls.” Pages 246263 in Rediscovering the Dead Sea Scrolls: An Assessment of Old and New Approaches and Methods. Edited by Maxine L. Grossman. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans2010.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JokirantaJutta. “Sociological Approaches to Qumran Sectarianism.” Pages 200231 in The Oxford Handbook of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Edited by Timothy H. Lim and John J. Collins. New York: Oxford University Press2010.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JokirantaJutta. “Sex and the City: Evidence from the Dead Sea Scrolls.” Pages 7384 in Understanding Spiritual Meaning of Jerusalem in Three Abrahamic Religions. Edited by Antti Laato. Studies on the Children of Abraham 6. Leiden: Brill2019.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KielYishai. Sexuality in the Babylonian Talmud: Christian and Sasanian Contexts in Late Antiquity. New York: Cambridge University Press2016.

  • KlawansJonathan. “The Essene Hypothesis: Insights from Religion 101.” DSD 23 (2016): 5178.

  • LoaderWilliam. The Dead Sea Scrolls on Sexuality: Attitudes towards Sexuality in Sectarian and Related Literature at Qumran. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans2009.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MarksSusan. “Women in Early Judaism: Twenty-five Years of Research and Reenvisioning.” CurBR 6 (2008): 290320.

  • MermelsteinAri. “Emotional Regimes, Ritual Practice, and the Shaping of Sectarian Identity: The Experience of Ablutions in the Dead Sea Scrolls.” BibInt 24 (2016): 492513.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NicholsonLinda J. ed. Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge1990.

  • NoamVered. “Divorce in Qumran in Light of Early Halakhah.” JJS 56 (2005): 206223.

  • QimronElisha. “Celibacy in the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Two Kinds of Sectarians.” Pages 287294 in vol. 1 of The Madrid Qumran Congress: Proceedings of the International Congress on the Dead Sea Scrolls Madrid 18‒21 March 1991. Edited by Julio Trebolle Barrera and Luis Vegas Montaner. STDJ 11. Leiden: Brill1992.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RegevEyal. “Cherchez les Femmes: Were the yaḥad Celibates?DSD 15 (2008): 253284.

  • SatlowMichael L. Jewish Marriage in Antiquity. Princeton: Princeton University Press2001.

  • SchiffmanLawrence H. Reclaiming the Dead Sea Scrolls: The History of Judaism the Background of Christianity and the Lost Library of Qumran. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society1994.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SchiffmanLawrence H.Prohibited Marriages in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Rabbinic Literature.” Pages 113125 in Rabbinic Perspectives: Rabbinic Literature and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Edited by Steven D. FraadeAharon Shemesh and Ruth A. Clements. STDJ 62. Leiden: Brill2006.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SchofieldAlison. From Qumran to the Yaḥad: A New Paradigm of Textual Development for The Community Rule. STDJ 77. Leiden: Brill2009.

  • SchultzBrian. “The Qumran Cemetery: 150 Years of Research.” DSD 13 (2006): 194228.

  • ShemeshAharon. “Marriage and Marital Life in the Dead Sea Scrolls.” Pages 589600 in The Dead Sea Scrolls and Contemporary Culture: Proceedings of the International Conference held at the Israel Museum Jerusalem (July 6‒8 2008). Edited by Adolfo D. RoitmanLawrence H. Schiffman and Shani Tzoref. Leiden: Brill2011.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SternSacha. “Qumran Calendars and Sectarianism.” Pages 232253 in The Oxford Handbook of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Edited by Timothy H. Lim and John J. Collins. New York: Oxford University Press2010.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TaylorJoan E.The Classical Sources on the Essenes and the Scrolls Communities.” Pages 173199 in The Oxford Handbook of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Edited by Timothy H. Lim and John J. Collins. New York: Oxford University Press2010.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TaylorJoan E.Women, Children, and Celibate Men in the Serekh Texts.” HTR 104 (2011): 171190.

  • WassénCecilia. Women in the Damascus Document. AcBib 21. Atlanta: SBL2005.

  • WassénCecilia. “The Importance of Marriage in the Construction of a Sectarian Identity in the Dead Sea Scrolls.” Pages 127150 in Social Memory and Social Identity in the Study of Early Judaism and Early Christianity. Edited by Samuel ByrskogRaimo Hakola and Jutta Jokiranta. NTOA 116. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht2016.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WassénCecilia. “Women, Worship, Wilderness, and War: Celibacy and the Constructions of Identity in the Dead Sea Scrolls.” Pages 13611385 in Sibyls Scriptures and Scrolls: John Collins at Seventy. Edited by Joel BadenHindy Najman and Eibert Tigchelaar. JSJSup 175. Leiden: Brill2017.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WassénCecilia. “Daily Life.” Pages 547558 in T&T Clark Companion to the Dead Sea Scrolls. Edited by George J. Brooke and Charlotte Hempel. New York: T&T Clark2019.

    • Rechercher Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 48 48 5
Full Text Views 25 25 11
PDF Downloads 14 14 4