This paper will revisit the frequent use of the periphrastic construction of a form of the verb היה + participle in the Temple Scroll (TS). As others have noted, TS preserves by far the largest number of cases of this construction in the Qumran corpus, and these cases overwhelmingly involve the yiqṭol of היה. The use of the construction has also been given compositional weight, serving as a source-critical indicator in prominent theories of the diachronic development of TS. This essay provides a detailed analysis of how the periphrastic construction functions in TS, compares that function to the use of the construction in other Qumran texts, and asks what, if anything, the construction’s distribution might be able to tell us about the processes by which the Temple Scroll was composed.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Crawford, Sidnie White. The Temple Scroll and Related Texts. CQS 2. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2000.
Crawford, Sidnie White. Rewriting Scripture in Second Temple Times. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2008.
Geiger, Gregor. Das hebräische Partizip in den Texten aus der judäischen Wüste. STDJ 101. Leiden: Brill, 2012.
Gzella, Holger. “The Use of the Participle in the Hebrew Bar Kosiba Letters in the Light of Aramaic.” DSD 14 (2007): 90–98.
Holst, Søren. Verbs and War Scroll: Studies in the Hebrew Verbal System and the Qumran War Scroll. Studia Semitica Upsaliensia 25. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet, 2008.
Joüon, Paul, and Takamitsu Muraoka. A Grammar of Biblical Hebrew. 2nd ed. Rome: Gregorian and Biblical Press, 2006.
Muraoka, Takamitsu. “The Participle in Qumran Hebrew with Special Reference to Its Periphrastic Use.” Pages 188–204 in Sirach, Scrolls, and Sages: Proceedings of a Second International Symposium on the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls, Ben Sira, and the Mishnah. Edited by T. Muraoka and J.F. Elwolde. STDJ 33. Leiden: Brill, 1999.
Pérez Fernández, Miguel. An Introductory Grammar of Rabbinic Hebrew. Translated by John Elwolde. Leiden: Brill, 1999.
Peursen, W.Th. “Periphrastic Tenses in Ben Sira.” Pages 158–73 in The Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls and Ben Sira. Edited by T. Muraoka and J.F. Elwolde. STDJ 26. Leiden: Brill, 1997.
Qimron, Elisha. A Grammar of the Hebrew of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Jerusalem: Yad Ben-Zvi, 2018.
Schiffman, Lawrence H. “The Law of the Temple Scroll and Its Provenance.” Pages 3–18 in The Courtyards of the House of the Lord: Studies on the Temple Scroll. Edited by Florentino García Martínez. STDJ 75. Leiden: Brill, 2008.
Schiffman, Lawrence H. “The Theology of the Temple Scroll.” Pages 19–32 in The Courtyards of the House of the Lord: Studies on the Temple Scroll. Edited by Florentino García Martínez. STDJ 75. Leiden: Brill, 2008.
Swanson, Dwight D. The Temple Scroll and the Bible: The Methodology of 11QT. STDJ 14. Leiden: Brill, 1995.
Wilson, Andrew M., and Lawrence Wills. “Literary Sources of the Temple Scroll.” HTR 75 (1982): 275–88.
Wise, Michael O. A Critical Study of the Temple Scroll from Qumran Cave 11. SAOC 49. Chicago: Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago, 1990.
Yadin, Yigael. The Temple Scroll. 3 vols. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 1977–83.
Zahn, Molly M. “Schneiderei oder Weberei? Zum Verständnis der Diachronie der Tempelrolle.” RevQ 20 (2001): 255–86.
Zahn, Molly M. Genres of Rewriting in Second Temple Judaism: Scribal Composition and Transmission. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 239 | 70 | 10 |
Full Text Views | 67 | 0 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 121 | 3 | 0 |
This paper will revisit the frequent use of the periphrastic construction of a form of the verb היה + participle in the Temple Scroll (TS). As others have noted, TS preserves by far the largest number of cases of this construction in the Qumran corpus, and these cases overwhelmingly involve the yiqṭol of היה. The use of the construction has also been given compositional weight, serving as a source-critical indicator in prominent theories of the diachronic development of TS. This essay provides a detailed analysis of how the periphrastic construction functions in TS, compares that function to the use of the construction in other Qumran texts, and asks what, if anything, the construction’s distribution might be able to tell us about the processes by which the Temple Scroll was composed.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 239 | 70 | 10 |
Full Text Views | 67 | 0 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 121 | 3 | 0 |