This essay engages Idan Dershowitz’s recent attempt to rehabilitate the Deuteronomy fragments Moses Wilhelm Shapira offered for sale in 1883. After summarizing the contents of Dershowitz’s volume, this paper evaluates Shapira’s fragments in relation to the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Moabitica and other forgeries connected to Shapira. It considers the implications of Shapira’s transcription of the text, which Dershowitz uses to demonstrate Shapira’s innocence. To counter Dershowitz’s hypothesis regarding the “proto-biblical” origin of the fragments, it is proposed that the composition is better understood as a post-biblical pastiche. Dershowitz has endeavored to sever the text from the possibilities allowed by 19th century European scholarship; the present article contextualizes the find within the religious world of 19th century Jerusalem. While the allure of significance can encourage scholars to overcome doubts and accept the authenticity of suspicious objects, Shapira’s fragments remain very dubious indeed.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Adler, Cyrus, “Remarks on the Shapira Hebrew Roll, deposited in the Rush Library in Philadelphia.” Page xli of “Appendix: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Session, Hanover, 1884,” in Transactions of the American Philological Association 15 (1884): i–lxiii.
Adler, Cyrus. I Have Considered the Days. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1941.
Allegro, John Marco. The Shapira Affair. New York: Doubleday, 1965.
Bernhard, Andrew. “The Gospel of Jesus’ Wife: Textual Evidence of a Modern Forgery.” NTS 61 (2015): 335–55.
Berit Ḥadashah al-pi Mashiaḥ. London: A. MacIntosh, 1817.
Bleek, Friedrich. Einleitung in Das Alte Testament. Edited by Johannes Bleek and Adolf Kamphausen. Berlin: G. Reiner, 1860.
Bleek, Friedrich. Introduction to the Old Testament. Edited by Johannes Bleek and Adolf Kamphausen. Translated by G.H. Venables; translation edited by Edmund Venables. 2 vols. London: George Bell and Sons, 1882.
The Book of Common Prayer. Cambridge: John Baskerville, 1762.
Clermont-Ganneau, Charles. “Mr. Shapira’s Manuscripts.” The Times (August 21, 1883): 8. Reprinted in Palestine Exploration Fund Quarterly Statement 15.4 (1883): 201–5.
Clermont-Ganneau, Charles. “Genuine and False Inscriptions in Palestine.” PEF QS 16.1 (1884): 89–100.
Clermont-Ganneau, Charles. Les Fraudes Archéologiques en Palestine. Paris: Ernst Leroux, 1885.
Davis, Kipp. “Caves of Dispute: Patterns of Correspondence and Suspicion in the Post-2002 ‘Dead Sea Scrolls’ Fragments.” DSD 24.2 (2017): 22–70.
Davis, Kipp, et al. “Nine Dubious ‘Dead Sea Scrolls’ Fragments from the Twenty-First Century.” DSD 24.2 (2017): 189–228.
de Jonge, Marinus. Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament as Part of Christian Literature: The Case of the Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs and the Greek Life of Adam and Eve. SVTP 18. Leiden: Brill, 2003.
Delitzsch, Franz. Sifre ha-Berit ha-Ḥadashah: Neʻetakim mi-leshon Yavan le-lashon ʻIvrit. Leipzig: British and Foreign Bible Society, 1877.
Denzey Lewis, Nicola. “Rethinking the Rethinking of the Nag Hammadi Codices.” BSR 45.2 (2016): 39–45.
Denzey Lewis, Nicola, and Justine Ariel Blount, “Rethinking the Origins of the Nag Hammadi Codices.” JBL 133.2 (2014): 397–417.
Dershowitz, Idan. The Valediction of Moses: A Proto-Biblical Book. FAT 145. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2021.
Dershowitz, Idan. “The Valediction of Moses: New Evidence on the Shapira Deuteronomy Fragments.” ZAW 133.1 (2021): 1–22 (https://doi.org/10.1515/zaw-2021-0001).
Ehrman, Bart D. Forgery and Counterforgery: The Use of Literary Deceit in Early Christian Polemics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2013.
Fenton, Paul B. “Moses Shapira’s Journey to the Yemen.” Pages lxviii–lxxxi in volume 2 of Mittuv Yosef: Yosef Tobi Jubilee Volume. Edited by Ayelet Oettinger and Danny Bar-Maoz. 2 vols. Haifa: University of Haifa Press, 2011.
Fields, Westin W. The Dead Sea Scrolls, A Full History: Volume 1, 1947–1960. Leiden: Brill, 2009.
Frankel, David. The Murmuring Stories of the Priestly School: A Retrieval of Ancient Sacerdotal Lore. VTSup 89. Leiden: Brill, 2002.
Fürst, Julius. Librorum sacrorum Veteris Testamenti Concordantiae Hebraicae atque Chaldaicae (= Otzar Lashon ha-Qodesh). Leipzig: C. Tauchnitz, 1837–1840.
Gibson, Shimon. Jerusalem in Original Photographs 1850–1920: Photography from the Archives of the Palestine Exploration Fund. London: Stacey International, 2003.
Ginsburg, Christian D. The Moabite Stone: A Facsimile of the Original Inscription with an English Translation and a Historical Critical Commentary. 2nd ed., Revised and Enlarged. London: Reeves and Turner, 1871.
Ginsburg, Christian D. “The Shapira MS of Deuteronomy.” Athenæum 2911 (August 11, 1883): 178–179; 2912 (August 18, 1883): 206; 2913 (August 25, 1883): 242–44.
Goldsmid, Albert E. “The Shapira Manuscript.” The Jewish Chronicle 753 (August 31, 1883): 4.
Grafton, Anthony. Forgers and Critics: Creativity and Duplicity in Western Scholarship. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
Guil, Shlomo. “The Shapira Scroll Was an Authentic Dead Sea Scroll.” Palestine Exploration Quarterly 149 (2017): 6–27.
Guthe, Hermann. Fragmente einer Lederhandschrift enthaltend Mose’s letzte Rede an die Kinder Israel. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1883.
Harry, Myriam. The Little Daughter of Jerusalem. Translated by Phoebe Allen. New York: Dutton, 1919.
Heide, Martin. “The Moabitica and their Aftermath: How to Handle a Forgery Affair with an International Impact.” Pages 193–241 in New Inscriptions and Seals Relating to the Biblical World. Edited by Meir Lubetski and Edith Lubetski. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2012.
Hendel, Ronald S. “Notes on the Orthography of the Shapira Manuscripts: The Forger’s Marks.” ZAW 133.2 (2021): 225–30.
Hill, Brian Sabin. “Ephraim Deinard on the Shapira Affair.” The Book Collector (1997): 167–79.
Jefferson, Helen G. “The Shapira Manuscript and the Qumran Scrolls.” Revue de Qumrân 6.3 / 23 (1968): 391–99.
Jones, Christopher P. “The Jesus’ Wife Papyrus in the History of Forgery.” NTS 61.3 (2015): 367–78.
Jones, Christopher P. “The Syntax of Forgery.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 160.1 (2016): 26–36.
Jones, Mark. “Introduction: Why Fakes?” Pages 11–16 in Fake? The Art of Deception. Edited by Mark Jones with Paul Craddock and Nicolas Barker. London: British Museum Press, 1990.
Leher-Jacobson, Gusta. Fakes and Forgeries: From Collections in Israel (Hebrew, with translation by Jay C. Jacobson). Tel Aviv: Eretz Israel Museum, 1989.
“Literary Gossip.” Athenæum 2909 (July 28, 1883): 116.
Lumley, Henry. “New Moabite Stone (Letter to the Editor).” The Times (January 26, 1872).
Mansoor, Menahem. “The Case of Shapira’s Dead Sea (Deuteronomy) Scrolls of 1883.” Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters 47 (1958): 183–225.
Mansoor, Menahem. The Thanksgiving Hymns: Translated and Annotated with an Introduction. Leiden: Brill, 1961.
Meier, John P. A Marginal Jew, Volume 4: Law and Love. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009.
McCaul, Alexander. The Old Paths: A Comparison of the Principles and Doctrines of Modern Judaism with the Religion of Moses and the Prophets. London: London Society [for Promoting Christianity Amongst the Jews]: 1837.
Mroczek, Eva. “True Stories and the Poetics of Textual Discovery.” BSR 45.2 (2016): 21–31.
Mroczek, Eva. “Batshit Stories: New Tales of Discovering Ancient Texts.” Marginalia: Los Angeles Review of Books (June 22, 2018): https://marginalia.lareviewofbooks.org/batshit-stories-new-tales-of-discovering-ancient-texts/
“A New Version of Deuteronomy.” The Jewish Chronicle 749 (August 3, 1883): 13.
Nichols, Ross K. The Moses Scroll, with Forward by James D. Tabor. Saint Francisville, La.: Horeb Press, 2021.
“Notes of the Week.” The Jewish Chronicle 752 (August 24, 1883): 3.
Rabinowicz, Oskar. “The Shapira Scroll: A Nineteenth Century Forgery.” JQR 56.1 (1965): 1–21.
Reiner, Fred N. “C.D. Ginsburg and the Shapira Affair: A Nineteenth Century Dead Sea Scroll Controversy.” The British Library Journal 21.1 (1995): 109–27.
Reiner, Fred N. “Tracking the Shapira Case: A Biblical Scandal Revisited.” Biblical Archaeology Review 23.3 (1997): 32–34, 36–41.
Richelle, Matthieu. “The Shapira Strips in Light of Paleography.” Semitica 63 (2021): 243–94.
Sabar, Ariel. “The Unbelievable Tale of Jesus’s Wife.” The Atlantic, July/August 2016.
Sabar, Ariel. Veritas: A Harvard Professor, a Con Man, and the Gospel of Jesus’s Wife. New York: Doubleday, 2020.
Sabo, Yoram. The Scroll Merchant: In Search of Moses Wilhelm Shapira’s Lost Jewish Treasure (Hebrew). Bnei Brak: Hakibbutz Hameuchad, 2018.
Salmon, Irit, ed. Truly Fake: Moses Wilhelm Shapira, Master Forger. Jerusalem: Israel Museum, 2000.
Sanders, E.P. Paul and Palestinian Judaism: A Comparison of Patterns of Religion. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1977.
Sayce, Archibald H. “Correspondence: the Shapira Mss. Of Deuteronomy.” The Academy 589 (August 24, 1883): 117.
Schuessler, Jennifer. “Is a Long-Dismissed Forgery Actually the Oldest Known Biblical Manuscript?” The New York Times (online) March 10, 2021; updated March 14: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/03/10/arts/bible-deuteronomy-discovery.html.
Schuessler, Jennifer. “A Fake? Or Biblical Gold?” The New York Times (print), March 28, 2021: AR 8–9.
Seder ha-Tefilah / The Book of Common Prayer, Translated into Hebrew. London: London Society for Promoting Christianity Amongst the Jews, 1836.
Shanks, Hershel. “Fakes! How Moses Shapira Forged an Entire Civilization.” Archaeology Odyssey 5.5 (2002): 33–34, 36–41.
Shapira, Moses Wilhelm. “Letter to C.D. Ginsburg.” (August 23, 1883). British Library Ms. Add. 41294.
Shapira, Moses Wilhelm. “Letter to Hermann Strack.” (May 9, 1883). British Library Ms. Add. 41294. Transcription by Ross K. Nichols: https://www.academia.edu/48769937/Moses_W_Shapiras_Letter_to_Hermann_Strack
“Shapira’s MSS.” The Old Testament Student 3.1 (1883): 23–25.
Smith, Morton. Clement of Alexandria and a Secret Gospel of Mark. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1973.
Socin, Albert. “The Manufacture of Inscriptions.” The Academy 3.47 (May 1872): 179–80.
Socin, Albert. “Letter to the Editor: The Manufacture of Inscriptions.” The Academy 3.51 (July 1872): 260.
Stackert, Jeffrey. A Prophet Like Moses: Prophecy, Law, and Israelite Religion. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Suchard, Benjamin D. “A Valediction to Moses Shapira’s Deuteronomy Document.” Bibliotheca Orientalis 78.3–4 (2021): 364–87.
Teicher, J.L. “Jesus in the Habakkuk Scroll.” Journal of Jewish Studies 3.2 (1952): 53–55.
Teicher, J.L. “The Genuineness of the Shapira Manuscripts.” Times Literary Supplement, March 22, 1957, 184.
Tigay, Chanan. The Lost Book of Moses: The Hunt for the World’s Oldest Bible. New York: Ecco, 2016.
Vester, Bertha Spafford. Our Jerusalem: An American Family in the Holy City, 1881–1949. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1950.
Wigram, George V. The Englishman’s Hebrew and Chaldee Concordance of the Old Testament. 2 vols. 3rd ed. London: Samuel Bagster and Sons, 1866.
Yahuda, A.S. “The Story of a Forgery and the Mēša Inscription.” JQR 35.2 (1944): 139–64.
Zeitlin, Solomon. “The Alleged Antiquity of the Scrolls.” JQR 40.1 (1949): 57–78.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 999 | 171 | 28 |
Full Text Views | 113 | 18 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 294 | 38 | 1 |
This essay engages Idan Dershowitz’s recent attempt to rehabilitate the Deuteronomy fragments Moses Wilhelm Shapira offered for sale in 1883. After summarizing the contents of Dershowitz’s volume, this paper evaluates Shapira’s fragments in relation to the Dead Sea Scrolls, the Moabitica and other forgeries connected to Shapira. It considers the implications of Shapira’s transcription of the text, which Dershowitz uses to demonstrate Shapira’s innocence. To counter Dershowitz’s hypothesis regarding the “proto-biblical” origin of the fragments, it is proposed that the composition is better understood as a post-biblical pastiche. Dershowitz has endeavored to sever the text from the possibilities allowed by 19th century European scholarship; the present article contextualizes the find within the religious world of 19th century Jerusalem. While the allure of significance can encourage scholars to overcome doubts and accept the authenticity of suspicious objects, Shapira’s fragments remain very dubious indeed.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 999 | 171 | 28 |
Full Text Views | 113 | 18 | 0 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 294 | 38 | 1 |