The European Arrest Warrant and Fundamental Rights

Risks of Violation of Fundamental Rights through the EU Framework Decision in Light of the ECHR

in European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The following article is a short summary of the author’s PhD thesis (N.M. Schallmoser, Europäischer Haftbefehl und Grundrechte. Risiken der Verletzung von Grundrechten durch den EU-Rahmenbeschluss im Lichte der EMRK (Manz‘sche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung, Vienna, 2012), hereafter Schallmoser (2012)). The framework decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between EU member states established a new and uniform system of surrender within the EU. Nevertheless, there is no fundamental rights clause that makes it possible to refuse surrender for reasons of fundamental rights and hardly any fundamental rights guarantees of the accused person are ensured in this framework decision. This is — besides the principle of mutual recognition — the consequence of the currently practiced concept of “division of labour” in fundamental rights matters within the EU, according to which the EU legislator only has to omit, but not to prevent fundamental rights infringements through legislation, and therefore waives establishing such fundamental rights guarantees. The consequences are different risks of the accused person to become a victim of violations of fundamental rights during an internationally labour-divided criminal proceeding. A “risk” in this regard is defined as the substantial likelihood that interference in a person’s fundamental rights leads to a violation or an aggravation of a violation that has already occurred. The present article declares the European legislator as the responsible authority for minimizing such risks. This obligation can be derived from the autonomous and independent commitment of the EU to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and of course the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as set forth in Article 6 TEU.

The European Arrest Warrant and Fundamental Rights

Risks of Violation of Fundamental Rights through the EU Framework Decision in Light of the ECHR

in European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice

Sections

References

25

1 December 2008C-388/08 pt 51.

26

16 November 2010C-261/09 pt 37.

28

29 January 2013C-396/11 pt 43.

29

26 February 2013C-399/11 pt 64.

38

12 December 1996C-74/95 and C-129/95 Telecom Italia; for details on this judgment Schröder (2002) 385 et seq.

39

12 December 1996C-74/95 and C-129/95 Telecom Italia pt 25.

40

12 December 1996C-74/95 and C-129/95 Telecom Italia pt 26.

41

12 December 1996C-74/95 and C-129/95 Telecom Italia pts 29–32.

57

H. HoffmannRechtsfragen der atomaren Entsorgung (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta1981) 310 et seq.

58

P. MarburgerDie Regeln der Technik im Recht (Cologne: Carl Heymann1979) 125.

64

Schallmoser (2012) 28 et seq.

74

In detail Schallmoser (2012) 176 et seq.

82

Details by Schallmoser (2012) 207 et seq.; O. Lagodny and N.M. Schallmoser ‘Die Geltung der Garantien des Art. 6 EMRK im Auslieferungsverfahren des ersuchten Staates’ in: G. Hafner F. Matscher and K. Schmalenbach (Eds) Völkerrecht und die Dynamik der Menschenrechte — Liber amicorum Wolfram Karl (Vienna: Facultas 2012) 125 et seq.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 10 10 4
Full Text Views 5 5 5
PDF Downloads 0 0 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0