A Tale of Two Cities: Whole of Life Prison Sentences in Strasbourg and Westminster

in European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.


Have Institutional Access?

Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


The recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Hutchinson v United Kingdom (2015) is the latest twist in the political legal struggle between Westminster and Strasbourg. Whilst the British government has made several successions to the ECtHR regarding the role of the executive in the imprisonment of lifers, the thorny issue of the whole of life tariff, and prospect of prisoner release under that tariff, has been an ongoing debate. Whilst the ECtHR appeared to directly challenge domestic policy in the preceding decision in Vinter and Others v United Kingdom this latest decision, the seeming retreat from Vinter, by the Fourth Section of the court, appears to be more of a response to hard line domestic politics than a continuation of holistic legal principle which the ECtHR has outwardly supported in the past.

A Tale of Two Cities: Whole of Life Prison Sentences in Strasbourg and Westminster

in European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice



BarrettD.European Court Ruling: Authors of Human Rights Treaty would be ‘Turning in their Graves’The Telegraph (9 July 2013).

bbc NewsHindley Loses Life Sentence Appeal (5 November 1998).

bbc NewsTheresa May: Tories to Consider Leaving European Convention on Human Rights (9 March 2013).

BengeJ.European Court to Rule on ‘Whole Life Tariff’ Legality of Triple Murderer Arthur HutchinsonThe Independent (1 February 2015).

Blom-CooperT.The Penalty for Murder: A Myth Exploded’Criminal Law Review (1996) 707716.

Blom-CooperT.Life until Death: Interpretations of Section 1(1) of the Murder (Abolition of the Death Penalty) Act 1965’Criminal Law Review (1999) 899905.

BowcottO.Votes for Prisoners: uk Told it Must Implement echr DecisionThe Guardian (10 December 2012).

BowcottO.Conservatives Clash over European Court Ruling on Prisoner Voting RightsThe Guardian (20 November 2013).

BowcottO.Conservatives Pledge Powers to Ignore European Court of Human Rights RulingsThe Guardian (3 October 2014).

CohenT.Britain should Leave European Court of Human Rights to Stop it Unravelling Over Votes for Prisoners, Warns Human Rights CommissionerDaily Mail (18 October 2013).

ClarkN.‘Let’s Hear it for David BlunkettThe Spectator (17 May 2003).

Conservatives (2014) ‘Protecting Human Rights in the uk’ Conservative Party Paper available online at https://www.conservatives.com/~/media/files/downloadable% 20Files/human_rights.pdf(last accessed 19 March 2015).

CreightonS.Are Whole Life Tariffs Inhumane?’ 177 Criminal Law & Justice Weekly (2013) 169170.

Daily Mail NewsBlunkett Vows to Keep Worst Murderers Behind Bars for Life’Daily Mail (28 May 2002).

DawarA.Fury at Plan to let Murderers off an Automatic Life TermThe Express (7 December 2011).

NewsEurActivInterior Minister Urges Britain to Leave Human Rights ConventionEurActiv News (11 March 2013).

foi Request 94091 (on file with the author).

foi Request 94422 (on file with the author).

GibbF. ‘Human Rights Veto Threatens Future of ukThe Times (4 December 2014).

GrieveRtHonD.Why it Matters that the Conservatives should Support the European Convention on Human Rightsucl Judicial Institute Lecture (3 December 2014) available online at https://www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/judicial-institute/files/Dominic_Grieve_s_Speech.pdf) (last accessed 19 March 2015).

GuardianThe‘Life that meant Life behind Bars’ The Guardian (16 November 2002).

KandeliaS.‘Life Meaning Life: Is There Any Hope of Release for Prisoners Serving Whole Life Orders?’, 75 TheJournal of Criminal Law (2011) 70–87.

KernS.European Court Undermining British Sovereignty Gatestone Institute (17 January 2014) available online at http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/4134/echr-uk (last accessed 26 June 2014).

KirkupJ.Britain May Need to Withdraw from European Convention on Human Rights, says Cameron’The Telegraph (29 September 2013).

LubitzR. and RossT.‘Sentencing Guidelines: Reflections on the Future’ 10 Sentencing and Corrections (2001) 17.

MasonR.Grayling says European Court of Human Rights has Lost LegitimacyThe Guardian (30 December 2013).

Ministry of JusticeOffender Management Statistics Bulletin, England and WalesMinistry of Justice (29 January 2015).

MorrisonD.Will a Conservative Government Withdraw From the European Convention on Human Rights?Huffington Post (15 October 2014).

Prison Reform Trust Prison: The Facts (2014) available online at http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/Portals/0/Documents/Prison%20the%20facts%20May%202014.pdf) (last accessed 5 March 2015).

RobinsonM.Revealed: The Ten Convicted Murderers who were Freed on Licence Only to Kill Again in the Past DecadeDaily Mail (5 October 2013).

SchoneJ.M.The Hardest Case of All: Myra Hindley, Life Sentences, and the Rule of Law’ 28 International Journal of the Sociology of Law (2000) 273289.

ShuteS.Punishing Murderers: Release Procedures and the “tariff”, 1953–2004’Criminal Law Review (2004) 873–895.

StanfordP. (2002) ‘Myra HindleyThe Guardian (16 November 2002).

SteeleJ.Convicted Murderers who were Set Free to KillThe Telegraph (26 January 2007).

SzydloM.‘Free Life after Life Imprisonment as a Human Right under the European Convention’ 9 European Constitutional Law Review (2013) 501512.

ViewTelegraphHarry Roberts: A Case when Life really should Mean LifeThe Telegraph (24 October 2014).

WattN. and BowcottO.Tories Plan to Withdraw uk from European Convention on Human RightsThe Guardian (3 October 2014).

WattN. and TravisA.Tory Ministers Condemn echr Ruling on Whole-Life Prison SentencesThe Guardian (9 July 2013).

WhiteheadT.Killers Freed to Kill AgainThe Telegraph (4 February 2010).

Hutchinson v United Kingdom (2015) echr 57592/08.

Vinter and Others v United Kingdom (2013) echr 66069/09.

Thynne Wilson and Gunnell v uk (1991) 13 ehrr 666.

R v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex p Doody (1994) 1 ac 531.

Wynne v United Kingdom (1994) 19 ehrr 333.

Stafford v United Kingdom (2002) 35 ehrr 1121.

R (on the application of Anderson) v Home Secretary (2002) ukhl46.

Kafkaris v Cyprus (2008) echr 21906/04.

R v Secretary of State for the Home Department Ex parte Hindley (2000) ukhl 21.

R v Bieber (aka Coleman) (2008) ewca Crim 1601.

R v Ian McLoughlin & R Lee William Newell. (2014) ewca Crim 188.

R v David Oakes and Others (2012) ewca Crim 2435.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 13 13 11
Full Text Views 12 12 11
PDF Downloads 4 4 3
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0