This article examines the extent to which Serbia has implemented relevant international standards on action against transnational organised crime contained in the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime 2000. The first part explores key obligations with particular reference to prohibition of substantive offences, intelligence-led law enforcement (special investigative techniques), confiscation of criminal proceeds, as well as international law enforcement cooperation. The second part of the article analyses how these obligations are implemented by Serbia in reality by examining legislative frameworks as well as law enforcement practices. The main conclusion is that, while Serbia has taken some steps to implement international standards with a view to enhancing individual and collective actions against transnational organised crime, effective law enforcement is hampered by issues such as corruption and a lack of expertise, experience and resources.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Ministry of the Interior, Organised Crime Threat Assessment in Serbia 2015, 123.
6 September 2001.
Obokata, supra note 13, 40–42.
Slavery Convention 1926, 60 unts 254; and ilo Convention (No. 29) Concerning Forced and Compulsory Labour 1930, 39 unts 55.
A. Sambei, Civil Forfeiture (Confiscation in Rem): Explanatory and Impact Study (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, 2012), 5.
Ministry of the Interior, supra note 1, 123.
Eurojust, Issue in Focus No. 1: Cross-Border Controlled Deliveries from a Judicial Perspective (The Hague: Eurojust, 2015).
M. Vrhovšek, The Law on Confiscation of Proceeds of Crime in the Suppression of Crime – Important Link in the System of Combating Organised Crime (Zakon o oduzimanju imovine proistekle iz krivičnog dela u suzbijanju kriminala – važna karika u sistemu borbe protiv organizovanog kriminala)(Belgrade: Bezbednost, 2010), pp. 8–9.
Information Submitted by States, supra note 41, 13.
Trafficking in Persons Report 2015, supra note 103.
European Commission, supra note 107, 16.
European Commission, supra note 107, 62.
Ministry of Interior, Financial Investigation Strategy for the Period from 2015 to 2016, 8.
P. Ćetković, International Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters in the Prosecutorial Practice of the Republic of Serbia (Međunarodna pravna pomoć u krivičnim stvarima u praksi javnog tužilaštva Republike Srbije) (The Hague: International Criminal Law Association, 2015), pp. 3–4.
European Commission, supra note 98, 24.
European Commission, supra note 107, 61.
European Commission, supra note 98, 24.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 359 | 84 | 6 |
Full Text Views | 220 | 8 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 46 | 17 | 2 |
This article examines the extent to which Serbia has implemented relevant international standards on action against transnational organised crime contained in the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organised Crime 2000. The first part explores key obligations with particular reference to prohibition of substantive offences, intelligence-led law enforcement (special investigative techniques), confiscation of criminal proceeds, as well as international law enforcement cooperation. The second part of the article analyses how these obligations are implemented by Serbia in reality by examining legislative frameworks as well as law enforcement practices. The main conclusion is that, while Serbia has taken some steps to implement international standards with a view to enhancing individual and collective actions against transnational organised crime, effective law enforcement is hampered by issues such as corruption and a lack of expertise, experience and resources.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 359 | 84 | 6 |
Full Text Views | 220 | 8 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 46 | 17 | 2 |