Self-Legitimacy, Organisational Commitment and Commitment to Fair Treatment of Prisoners: An Empirical Study of Prison Officers in Slovenia

in European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Recent work on legitimacy within criminal justice systems have drawn attention to self-legitimacy; that is, criminal justice professionals’ own recognition of their entitlement to power. The evidence on this aspect of legitimacy remains sparse and mainly from police studies. We know almost nothing about the self-legitimacy of prison officers. This paper contributes to filling this gap, with an empirical focus on prison officers in Slovenia. Specifically, it explores the correlates of officer self-legitimacy and the implications of self-legitimacy for commitments to the rights of prisoners and to the organisation. Results from multiple regression analyses show that quality of interpersonal relationships among officers, perceived audience legitimacy (that is, officers’ sense of their moral standing among prisoners), and distributive justice predicted self-legitimacy. Self-legitimacy was associated with increased commitment to fair treatment of prisoners but it was irrelevant to organisational commitment. The implications of these findings are discussed.

Self-Legitimacy, Organisational Commitment and Commitment to Fair Treatment of Prisoners: An Empirical Study of Prison Officers in Slovenia

in European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice

Sections

References

AebiM.F.TiagoM.M. and BurkhardtC.space i—Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics: Prison populations. Survey 2014 (Strasbourg: Council of Europe2015).

BarkerR.Legitimating Identities: The Self-Presentation of Rulers and Subjects (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press2001).

BottomsA.E.Interpersonal violence and social order in prisons26 Crime & Justice (1999) 205281.

BottomsA. and TankebeJ.Beyond procedural justice: a dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice102 Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology (2012) 119170.

BottomsA. and TankebeJ. ‘“Voice within”: power-holders’ perspectives on authority and legitimacy’ in TankebeJ. and LieblingA. (eds) Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: An International Exploration (Oxford: Oxford University Press2013) pp. 6082.

BradfordB.JacksonJ. and HoughM.Police futures and legitimacy: redefining good policing’ in BrownJ.M. (ed.) The Future of Policing (Abingdon: Routledge2014a) pp. 79100.

BradfordB.QuintonP.MyhillA. and PorterG.Why do ‘the law’ comply? procedural justice, group identification and officer motivation in police organizations11 European Journal of Criminology (2014b) 110131.

CrawfordA.Plural policing in the uk: policing beyond the police’ in NewburnT. (ed.) Handbook on Policing2nd edn. (Collumpton: Willan Publishing2008) pp. 147181.

CreweB.The Prisoner Society: Power Adaptation and Social Life in an English Prison (Oxford: Clarendon Press2009).

CreweB.Soft power in prison: implications for staff-prisoner relationships, liberty and legitimacy’8 European Journal of Criminology (2011) 455468.

FlanderB. and MeškoG.Penal and prison policy on the ‘sunny side of the alps’: the swan song of Slovenian exceptionalism?’European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research (2016) in press doi:.

GendersE. and PlayerE.Grendon: A Study of a Therapeutic Prison (Oxford: Clarendon Press1995).

GilbertM.J.The illusion of structure: a critique of the classical model of organisation and the discretionary power of correctional officers22 Criminal Justice Review (1997) 4964.

HacinR.Pregled slovenskega penološkega raziskovanja od sredine petdesetih let dvajsetega stoletja’66 Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo (2015) 235252.

HepburnJ.R.The exercise of power in coercive organisations: a study of prison guards’23 Criminology (1985) 145164.

International Centre for Prison Studies (2015) World Prison Brief. Available online at http://www.prisonstudies.org/country (accessed 24 March 2016).

KaminskiM.M. and GibbonsD.C.Prison subculture in Poland’40 Crime and Delinquency (1994) 105119.

KauffmanK.Prison Officers and their World (Cambridge ma: Harvard University Press1988).

LieblingA.Prison officers, policing and the use of discretion4 Theoretical Criminology (2000) 333357.

LieblingA.Distinctions and distinctiveness in the work of prison officers: legitimacy and authority revisited’8 European Journal of Criminology (2011) 484499.

LieblingA. and PriceD.An Exploration of Staff-Prisoner Relationships at hmp Whitemoor Research Report No. 6 (London: Prison Service1999).

LieblingA. and PriceD.The Prison Officer (Wotton-under-Edge: hmp Leyhill 2001).

LieblingAArnoldH. and StraubC.Psychological Survival Revisited: The Experience of Long-Term Imprisonment in Conditions of Maximum Security (Oxford: Unviersity Press2011).

McDermottK. and KingR.Mind games: where the action is in prisons28 British Journal of Criminology (1988) 357377.

MeškoG.ValentinčičD. and UmekP.Self-assessment of professional capacity, competence and values of prison officers in Slovenian prisons’ in MeškoG.PagonM. and DobovšekB. (eds) Policing in Central and Eastern Europe Dilemmas of Contemporary Criminal Justice (Ljubljana: Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security2004) pp. 535547.

MeškoG.FieldsC. and SmoleT.A concise overview of penology and penal practice in Slovenia: the unchanged capacity, new standards, and prison overcrowding’91 The Prison Journal (2011) 398424.

MeškoG.TankebeJ.ČuvanB. and ŠifrerJ.Samozaznava legitimnosti policistov in pravosodnih policistov v Sloveniji: perspektive postopkovne pravičnosti nadrejenih, odnosov s sodelavci in zaznane legitimnosti policije v javnosti’65 Revija za kriminalistiko in kriminologijo (2014) 221231.

ModicM.LobnikarB. and DvojmočM.Policijska dejavnost v Sloveniji: analiza procesov transformacije, pluralizacije in privatizacije’16 Varstvoslovje (2014) 217241.

NyeJ.Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York ny: Public Affairs2004).

PillingJ.Back to Basics: Relationships in the Prison Service. Eve Saville Memorial Lecture (London: istd1992).

ReisigM.D. and MeškoG.‘Procedural justice, legitimacy, and prisoner misconduct’15 Psychology Crime & Law (2009) 4159.

ShapiraR. and NavonD.Staff-inmate co-operation in israeli prisons: towards a non-functionalist theory of total institutions15 International Review of Modern Sociology (1985) 131146.

SparksJ.R. and BottomsA.E.Legitimacy and order in prisons46 British Journal of Sociology (1996) 4562.

SparksJ.R.BottomsA.E. and HayW.Prisons and the Problem of Order (Oxford: Clarendon Press1996).

SternV.Bricks of Shame (London: Penguin. 1987).

TankebeJ.Viewing things differently: the dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy’51 Criminology (2013) 103135.

TankebeJ.Rightful Authority: Exploring the Structure of Police Self-Legitimacy (Cambridge: University of Cambridge, Institute of Criminology2014) available online at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2499717 (accessed 20 April 2016).

TankebeJ. and MeškoG.Police self-legitimacy, use of force, and pro-organizational behavior in Slovenia’ In MeškoG. and TankebeJ. (eds) Trust and Legitimacy in Criminal Justice: European Perspectives (Cham: Springer2015) pp. 261278.

TylerT.R.Why People Obey the Law (London: Yale University Press1990).

TylerT.R.Trust and legitimacy: policing in the usa and Europe8 European Journal of Criminology (2011) 254266.

TylerT.R. and BladerS.Cooperation in Groups: Procedural Justice Social Identity and Behavioral Engagement (Philadelphia pa: Psychology Press2000).

TylerT.R.BragaA.FaganJ.MearesT. and SampsonR.Legitimacy and criminal justice: international perspectives’ in TylerT.R. (ed.) Legitimacy and Criminal Justice (New York ny: Russell Sage Foundation2008) pp. 929.

Uprava Republike Slovenije za izvrševanje kazenskih sankcij (ursiks)Letno poročilo 2015 (Ljubljana: Ministrstvo za pravosodje2016).

WolfeS.E. and NixJ.The alleged “Ferguson Effect” and Police willingness to engage in community partnership’40 Law and Human Behavior (2016) 110.

Zakon o izvrševanju kazenskih sankcij (ziks-1 Enforcement of Criminal Sanctions Act) (2006) Uradni list rs (110/06).

Zakon o spremembah in dopolnitvah Zakona o izvrševanju kazenskih sankcij (zsd-ziks-1 Amendments of the Enforcement of Criminal Sanctions Act). (2008) Uradni list rs (76/08).

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 26 26 10
Full Text Views 92 92 81
PDF Downloads 9 9 7
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0