The Limitations of the Harmonisation of Criminal Law in the European Union Protected by Articles 82(3) and 83(3) tfeu

In: European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice
Kaie Rosin University of Tartu, Estonia

Search for other papers by Kaie Rosin in
Current site
Google Scholar
Markus KärnerAdviser, Penal Law and Procedure Division, Criminal Policy Department, Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Estonia

Search for other papers by Markus Kärner in
Current site
Google Scholar
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution


Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):


Articles 82(3) and 83(3) tfeu give Member States the possibility to suspend the legislative procedure of eu criminal law. Article 82(3) allows that kind of emergency brake mechanism for the process of adopting minimum standards for harmonising rules of criminal procedure enhancing judicial cooperation in criminal matters and Article 83(3) for establishing minimum rules concerning the definition of criminal offences and sanctions. A Member State can only use the emergency brake clause when the proposal for the directive would affect the fundamental aspects of its criminal justice system. This prerequisite deserves a closer analysis, therefore the aim of this article is to interpret the meaning of tfeu articles 82(3) and 83(3) to better understand the limitations of the harmonisation of criminal law in the European Union.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1096 212 18
Full Text Views 209 20 0
PDF Views & Downloads 221 41 0