The Act on Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Act (NN 70/2017) introduced, into the Croatian legal system, the Directive 2013/48/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and European arrest warrant proceedings as well as the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty. This paper contains the analysis of the nomotechnical solutions after the implementation of the Directive 2013/48/EU in the Republic of Croatia. In addition, particular attention has been given to the new substantive term of the suspect and its practical implications in different stages of the Croatian criminal procedure with special reference to effects and perception of the implementation of the Directive 2013/48/EU in Croatian criminal procedure. The paper criticizes some domestic legal solutions and offer different approach, with respect to the trends that have been noticed after amendment of the Croatian Criminal Procedure Act.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Anagnostopoulos I., The Right of Access to a Lawyer in Europe: A Long Road Ahead? 4 European Criminal Law Review (2014) p. 3–18.
Ashworth A. , Redmayne M. , The Criminal Process (New York: Oxford University Press, 2014).
Bayer V. , Zakonik o krivičnom postupku (Zagreb: Informator, 1968).
Burić Z. , Karas Ž. , Prilog raspravi o dvojbama vezanima uz novu definiciju osumnjičenika i radnju njegova ispitivanja, 24 Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu (2017) pp. 443–482.
Burić Z. , Valković L. , Primjena izabranih elemenata prava na formalnu obranu iz prakse Europskog suda za ljudska prava u hrvatskom kaznenom postupku, 18 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu (2011) pp. 521–556.
Đurđević Z. , Međupostupak: optuživanje s kontrolom optužnice, in Đurđević Z., Gluščić S., eds., Kazneno procesno pravo: Primjerovnik (Zagreb: Narodne novine, 2017), pp. 127–151.
Đurđević Z. , The Directive on the Right of Access to a Lawyer in Criminal Proceedings filling a human rights gap in the European Union legal order, in Đurđević Z., Ivičević Karas E., eds., European criminal procedure law in service of protection of European union financial interests: State of Play and Challenges (Zagreb: Sveučilišna tiskara, 2016) pp. 9–23.
Gerrards J. , The scope of the ECtHR rights and institutional concerns in: Brems E., Gerards J., eds., Shaping Rights in the echr: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press, 2014) pp. 99–102.
Gluščić S. , Izvidi kaznenih djela prema Noveli Zakona o kaznenom postupku, 20 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu (2013) pp. 613–630.
Harris D. , O’Boyle M. , Warbrick C. , Law of the European Convention on Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).
Heard C. , Shaeffer R. , Making Defence Rights Practical and Effective: Towards an EU Directive on the Right to Legal Advice, 2 New Journal of European Criminal Law (2011) pp. 270–281.
Hirsch Ballin M.F.H. , Anticipative Criminal Investigation Theory and Counterterrorism Practice in the Netherlands and the United States (Hague: TMC Asser Press, 2012).
Hodgson J. , Criminal procedure in Europe’s Area of Freedom, Securtiy and Justice: the rights of suspects, in Mitsilegas V. , Bergström M. , Konstadinides T. , eds., Research Handbook on EU Criminal Law (Cheltenham: Elgar, 2016) pp. 168–189.
Ivičević Karas E. , Pomicanje granica prava na branitelja pod utjecajem europskog kaznenog prava 22 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu (2015) pp. 355–382.
Ivičević Karas E. , Burić Z. , Bonačić M. , Prava obrane u različitim stadijima hrvatskog kaznenog postupka: rezultati istraživanja prakse, 23 Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu (2016) pp. 509–545.
Ivičević Karas E. , Valković L. , Pravo na branitelja u policiji – pravna i stvarna ograničenja, 24 Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu (2017) pp. 413–442.
Kert R , Lehner A , Austria, in K. Ligeti ed., Towards a Prosecutor for the European Union (Oregon: Hart Publishing, 2013) pp. 9–58.
Klip A. , European Criminal Law (Intersentia, 2016).
Krapac D. , Kazneno procesno pravo, Prva knjiga: Institucije (Zagreb: Narodne novine, 2014).
Ljubanović V. , Kazneno procesno pravo (Osijek: Grafika 2002).
Lucifora A. , The role of national courts between EU obligations and national standards of protection of fundamental rights, 9 New Journal of European Criminal Law (2018) p. 216–228.
Mols V. , Bringing directives on procedural rights of the EU to police stations: Practical training for criminal defence lawyers 8 New Journal of European Criminal Law (2017) p. 300–308.
Novokmet A. , Vinković Z. , Police Interrogation of the Suspect in Croatia After the Implementation of the Directive 2013/48/EU – State of Play and Open Questions, in Duić D. , Petrašević T. , eds., EU and Comparative Law Issues and Challenges (Osijek: Faculty of Law Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2018) pp. 418–448.
Ogorodova A. , Spronken T. , Legal Advice in Police Custody: From Europe to a Local Police Station, 4 Erasmus Law Review (2014) pp. 191–205.
Pajčić M. , Istraga prema Noveli Zakona o kaznenom postupku, 20 Croatian Annual of Criminal Law and Practice (2013).
Pavišić B. , ‘Novi hrvatski Zakon o kaznenom postupku’, 15 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu (2008) pp. 489–602.
Pavišić B. , Komentar Zakona o kaznenom postupku s prilozima (Šmrika: Templar-book, 2015).
Pavliček J. , Uloga istražitelja u kaznenom postupku, 16 Croatian Annual of Criminal Law and Practice (2009) pp. 895–910.
Sabljar T. , Subjekti u kaznenom postupku – pozicija branitelja, 15 Hrvatski ljetopis za kazneno pravo i praksu (2008) pp. 797–816.
Schumann S. , ‘Germany’, in S. Schumann , K. Bruckmüller , R. Soyer , eds., Pre-trial Emergency Defence, Wien: Intersentia, 2012), pp. 73–103.
Soo A. , How are the member states progressing on transposition of Directive 2013/48/EU on the right of access to a lawyer? , 8 New Journal of European Criminal Law (2017) p. 64–76.
Symeonidou-Kastanidou E. , The Right of Access to a Lawyer in Criminal Proceedings: The transposition of Directive 2013/48/EU of 22 October, 2013 on national legislation, 5 European Criminal Law Review (2015) pp. 68–85.
Trechsel S. , Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).
Valković L. , Pravo na pristup branitelju u svjetlu presude Dvorski protiv Hrvatske, 23 Hrvatski ljetopis za kaznene znanosti i praksu (2016), pp. 339–369.
Winter L.B. , The EU Directive on the Right to Access to a Lawyer: A Critical Assessment, in S. Ruggeri, ed., Human Rights in European Criminal Law (Springer, 2015) pp. 111–131.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 634 | 55 | 8 |
Full Text Views | 46 | 3 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 53 | 10 | 3 |
The Act on Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Act (NN 70/2017) introduced, into the Croatian legal system, the Directive 2013/48/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and European arrest warrant proceedings as well as the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty. This paper contains the analysis of the nomotechnical solutions after the implementation of the Directive 2013/48/EU in the Republic of Croatia. In addition, particular attention has been given to the new substantive term of the suspect and its practical implications in different stages of the Croatian criminal procedure with special reference to effects and perception of the implementation of the Directive 2013/48/EU in Croatian criminal procedure. The paper criticizes some domestic legal solutions and offer different approach, with respect to the trends that have been noticed after amendment of the Croatian Criminal Procedure Act.
All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 634 | 55 | 8 |
Full Text Views | 46 | 3 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 53 | 10 | 3 |