The World between Us: State Security and the Negotiation of Social Categories in Interwar Romania

in East Central Europe
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The concept of security and the security culture of the state are always social constructs reflecting the outcome of interactions between state and society. Key categories of security, like dangerous social groups and activities are usually negotiated through these interactions. Politicians, secret agents, gendarms, denunciators, journalists, or the indicted, all shape the broader social meaning in a dynamic way. While in Greater Romania the state attempted to extend its control to ever broader segments of society in order to fend off perceived threats it had to rely on its own personnel and on people who cooperated in this effort, creating room for maneuver for everyone involved in this process. Due to its scarce resources the state could not even control entirely its own representatives, who often pursued a personal agenda different from the state’s own goals. Irredentism, associated with ethnic minorities exemplifies this situation quite well. In an effort to preempt any threat from national minorities with a kin-state gradually led to the association of irredentism with ethnicity, without having control over the latter’s exact meaning. Thus, its practical application depended on a series of factors, personal and structural ones, that finally led to a confusion and to the emptying of the concept that was applied without consistency. It was exactly this development that reconstituted the gap between state and society that actively engaged each other in the resulting process of negotiation. Under the surface of the rule of law and against the backdrop of the image of an ever more powerful state security apparatus, state and society defined together those informal rules of everyday co-existence that were often meant to hide reality from the watchful eyes of Bucharest.

The World between Us: State Security and the Negotiation of Social Categories in Interwar Romania

in East Central Europe

Sections

References

Arhivele Naționale (an).

Arhivele Naționale Istorice Centrale București (anic).

Direcția Generală a Poliției (dgp).

Ministerul Justiției Direcția Judiciară (mj dj).

Inspectoratul General al Jandarmeriei.

Secția Județeană Brașov (sj bv).

Legiunea Jandarmilor Brașov.

Secția Județeană Mureș (sj ms).

Direcţia Regională a Ministeriului de Interne Mureș Autonomă Maghiara (dr mai mam) inventar 1235.

Comisariatul de Poliţie Târnaveni.

Secția Județeană Cluj (sjcj).

Inspectoratul de Poliție Cluj inventar 399.

Secția Județeană Timiș (sj tm).

Fond 193 Legiunea Jandarmilor Severin inventar 828.

Fond 16 Legiunea Jandarmilor Timiș-Torontal inventar 216.

Ablonczy Balázs . 2007. “Őrzők. A többes identitás történeti stratégiái” [Guardians. The historical strategy of multiple identity]. Századvég 12 no. 1: 6378.

Báthory Ludovic . 2010. “Sistemul de contabilitate secretă a Societăţii Valea Jiului de Sus şi recalcularea producţiei de cărbune (1926–1930)” [The secret accounting system of the Societăţii Valea Jiului de Sus and a recalculation of its coal production (1926–1930)]. Anuarul Institutului de Istorie George Barit 49: 309333.

Billig Michael . 1995. Banal Nationalism. London: Sage.

Borsi-Kálmán Béla. 2012. “‘Regátiak,’ ‘erdélyiek’ és ‘magyarok’ Ion Gheorghe Duca, Constanin Argetoianu, Armand Călinescu, Grigore Gafencu, valamint Alexandru Vaida Voevod emlékirataiban” [“Old Kingdom Romanians,” “Transylvanians,” and “Hungarians” in the memoires of Ion Gheorghe Duca, Constantin Argetoianu, Armand Călinescu, Grigore Gafencu, and Alexandru Vaida Voevod]. In Emlékirat és történelem. A vii. Hungarológiai Kongresszus (Koloszvár Cluj-Napoca 2011. augusztus 22–27.) azonos című paneljének anyaga [Memoire and history. Papers presented at the vii Convention of Hungarology (Kolozsvár 22–27 August 2011)] ed. Pál Pritz and Jenő Horváth 3660. Budapest: Magyar Történelmi Társulat–Nemzetközi Magyarságtudományi Társaság.

Brubaker Rogers . 2006. Everyday Ethnicity and Nationalist Politics in a Transylvanian Town. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Călinescu Armand . 1990. Însemnari politice 1916–1939 [Political notes 1916–1939]. Ed. Savu. Dr. Al. Gh. Bucharest: Humanitas.

Conze Eckart . 2012. “Securitization. Gegenwartsdiagnose oder historischer Analysenansatz.” Geschichte und Gesellschaft 38 no. 3: 453467.

Daase Christopher . 2010. “Wandel der Sicherheitskultur.” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte. Beilage zur Wochenzeitung Das Parlament no. 50: 916.

Edensor Tim . 2002. National Identity Popular Culture and Everyday Life. Oxford: Berg.

Egry Gábor . 2012a. “ A megértés határán. Nemzetiségek és mindennapok Háromszéken a két világháború között” [On the border of understanding. Nationalities and the everyday in Háromszék between the world wars]. Limes 25 no. 2: 2950.

Egry Gábor . 2012b. “Keresztező párhuzamosok. Etnicitás és középosztályi kultúra a két világháború közti Erdélyben” [Intersecting parallels. Ethnicity and middle-class culture in interwar Transylvania]. In Határokon túl. Tanulmányok Mark Pittaway emlékére. [Beyond Frontiers. Studies Commemorating Mark Pittaway] ed. Bartha Eszter and Varga Zsuzsanna 282302. Budapest: L’Harmattan.

Egry Gábor . 2013. “Navigating the Straits. Changing Borders, Changing Rules and Practices of Ethnicity and Loyalty in Romania after 1918.” Hungarian Historical Review 2 no. 3: 449476.

Egry Gábor . 2014. “Phantom Menaces? Ethnic Categorization, Loyalty and State Security in Interwar Romania.” Hungarian Historical Review 3 no. 3: 650682.

Egry Gábor . 2015. Etnicitás identitás politika. Magyar kisebbségek nacionalizmus és regionalizmus között Romániában és Csehszlovákiában 1918–1944 [Ethnicity identity and politics. Hungarian minorities between in nationalism and regionalism in Romania and Czechoslovakia]. Budapest: Napvilág.

Fox John and Miller-Idress Cynthia . 2008. “Everyday nationhood.” Ethnicities 8 no. 4: 536563.

Hirschhausen Ulrike von. 2015. “A New Imperial History? Programm, Potenzial, Perspektiven.” Geschichte und Gesellschaft 41 no. 4: 718757.

Horváth Franz Sz. 2007. Zwischen Ablehnung und Anpassung: Politische Strategien der ungarischen Minderheitselite in Rumänien 1931–1940. Studia Hungarica Series. Munich: Verlag Ungarisches Institut.

Horváth Sándor ed. 2014. Az ügynök arcai. Mindennapi kollaboráció és ügynökkérdés [Faces of the agent. Everyday collaboration and the problem of agents]. Budapest: Libri.

Krätzner Anita . 2015. “Einleitung.” In Hinter vorgehaltener Hand: Studien zur historischen Denunziationsforschung ed. Krätzner Anita 720. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Lăcustă Ioan . 2007. Cenzura veghează 1937–1939 [Censorship monitors 1937–1939]. Bucharest: Curtea Veche.

“Magyar-román per/pár beszéd” [Hungarian-Romanian proceeding/dialogue]. 2001. Provincia 2 no. 4: 1214.

Malte Rolf . 2014. “Einführung: Imperiale Biographien. Lebenswege imperialer Akteure in Groß- und Kolonialreichen (1850–1918).” Geschichte und Gesellschaft 40 no. 1: 521.

Mylonas Harris . 2012. The Politics of Nation Building: Making Co-Nationals Refugees and Minorities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nopcsa Baron Franz . 2001. Reisen in den Balkan Die Lebenserinnerungen des Franz Baron Nopcsa. Peja: Dukagjini Balkan Books.

Nyagulov Blagovest . 2010. “Bulgarian Minority Elites in Greater Romania (1918–1940).” Auxiliary Historical Studies 6: 189199.

Reichardt Sven . 2016. “Überwachungsgeschichte(n). Facetten eines Forschungsfeldes.” Geschichte und Gesellschaft 42 no. 1: 533.

Scurtu Ioan ed. 1999. Minoritățile nationale in România 1931–1938 [National minorities in Romania 1931–1938]. Bucharest: Arhivele Statului.

Sorrels Kate . 2000. “Ethnicity as Evidence of Subversion. National Stereotypes and the Secret Police Investigation of Jews in Interwar Bessarabia.” Transversaal 3 no. 2: 318.

Spânu Alin . 2010. Istoria serviciilor de informații/contrainformații românești în perioada 1919–1945 [History of the Romanian information and counter-espionage services in the period 1919–1945]. Iași: Demiurg.

Zathureczky Gyula . 1937. “Magyarok megfélemlítése Erdélyben” [Intimidation of Hungarians in Transylvania]. Magyar Szemle 11.

Zeidler Miklós . 2003. A revíziós gondolat [Revisionist thought]. Budapest: Osiris.

Zwierlein Cornel . 2012. “Sicherheitsgeschichte. Ein neues Feld der Geschichtswissenschaften.” Geschichte und Gesellschaft 38 no. 3: 365386.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 10 10 3
Full Text Views 12 12 12
PDF Downloads 2 2 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0