Trotsky or Wallerstein?

Approaching the Habsburg Monarchy in the Nineteenth Century

in East Central Europe
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

This article examines the potentials of world-systems analysis (WSA) and uneven and combined development (UCD) for the history of nineteenth-century Habsburg Monarchy by critically engaging with Andrea Komlosy’s account of the Monarchy, written from the perspective of WSA. It argues that Komlosy does not provide a consistent WSA interpretation of the Monarchy’s history by trying to analyze the Monarchy as a world-economy in its own right, thus excluding geopolitical dynamics and the world-economy. Furthermore, core-periphery relations within the Monarchy are dealt with in a contradictory fashion. Crucially, the quite anomalous state formation is not accounted for. The problematic account of state formation, it is argued, is due to the limitations of WSA. By taking a closer look at the genesis of the Austro–Hungarian Compromise, the article claims that UCD is better suited for explaining state formation in the Monarchy.

Trotsky or Wallerstein?

Approaching the Habsburg Monarchy in the Nineteenth Century

in East Central Europe

Sections

References

Allinson Jamie C. and Anievas Alexander . 2009. “The Uses and Misuses of Uneven and Combined Development: An Anatomy of a Concept.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22 no. 1: 4767.

Allinson Jamie C. and Anievas Alexander . 2010a. “Approaching ‘the International’: Beyond Political Marxism.” In Marxism and World Politics: Contesting Global Capitalism edited by Anievas Alexander 197215. London: Routledge.

Allinson Jamie C. and Anievas Alexander . 2010b. “The Uneven and Combined Development of the Meiji Restoration: A Passive Revolutionary Road to Capitalist Modernity.” Capital & Class 34 no. 3: 469490.

Anievas Alexander . 2014. Capital the State and War: Class Conflict and Geopolitics in the Thirty Years’ Crisis 1914–1945. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Anievas Alexander and Matin Kamran eds. 2016. Historical Sociology and World History: Uneven and Combined Development over the Longue Durée. London: Rowan and Littlefield.

Anievas Alexander and Nisancioglu Kerem . 2015. How the West Came to Rule. London: Pluto Press.

Arrighi Giovanni . 1998. “Capitalism and the Modern World-System: Rethinking the Non-Debates of the 1970s.” Fernand Braudel Center Review 21 no. 1: 113129.

Bassett Richard . 2015. For God and Kaiser: The Imperial Austrian Army 1619–1918. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Beer Adolf . 1877. Die Finanzen Oesterreichs im XIX. Jahrhundert. Prague: Verlag von F. Tempsky.

Berzeviczy Albert . 1932. Az abszolutizmus kora Magyarországon 1849–1865 [The age of absolutism in Hungary 1849–1865] vol. 3. Budapest: Franklin.

Brandt Harm-Hinrich . 1978. Der österreichische Neoabsolutismus: Staatsfinanzen und Politik 1848–1860 vol. 1. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

Bruck Carl Ludwig Freiherr von . 1860. Die Aufgaben Oesterreichs. Leipzig: O. Wigand.

Burbank Jane and Cooper Frederick . 2010. Empires in World History: Power and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Callinicos Alex and Rosenberg Justin . 2008. “Uneven and Combined Development: The Social-Relational Substratum of ‘the International’? An Exchange of Letters.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 21 no. 1: 77112.

Chase-Dunn Christopher and Grell-Brisk Marilyn . 2016. “Uneven and Combined Development in the Sociocultural Evolution of World-Systems.” In Historical Sociology and World History: Uneven and Combined Development over the Longue Durée edited by Anievas Alexander and Kamran Matin 205219. London: Rowan and Littlefield.

Chase-Dunn Christopher and Hall Thomas D. . 1997. Rise and Demise: Comparing World-Systems. Boulder: Westview Press.

Clark Christopher M. 2006. Iron Kingdom: The Rise and Downfall of Prussia 1600–1947. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Davidson Neil . 2012. How Revolutionary Were the Bourgeois Revolutions? Chicago: Haymarket Books.

Davidson Neil . 2015. We Cannot Escape History. Chicago: Haymarket Books.

Davidson Neil . 2016. “The Conditions for the Emergence of Uneven and Combined Development.” In Historical Sociology and World History: Uneven and Combined Development over the Longue Durée edited by Anievas Alexander and Kamran Matin 3153. London: Rowman and Littlefield.

Deák István . 1979. The Lawful Revolution Louis Kossuth and the Hungarians 1848–1849. New York: Columbia University Press.

Dunn Bill and Radice Hugo eds. 2006. 100 Years of Permanent Revolution: Results and Prospects . London: Pluto Press.

Eddie Scott . 1989. “Economic Policy and Economic Development in Austria–Hungary, 1867–1913.” In Cambridge Economic History of Europe edited by Mathias Peter and Pollard Sidney 814886. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eisenmann Louis . 1971. Le compromis austro–hongrois de 1867: Étude sur le dualisme. Hattiesburg: Academic International.

Engels Friedrich . 1960. “Österreich.” In Karl Marx-Friedrich Engels-Werke vol. 82934. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.

Evans Robert John Weston . 2006. Austria Hungary and the Habsburgs: Essays on Central Europe c. 1683–1867. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Friedjung Heinrich . 1935. The Struggle for Supremacy in Germany 1859–1866. London: Macmillan.

Good David F. 1984. The Economic Rise of the Habsburg Empire 1750–1914. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Gramsci Antonio . 1987. Selections from the Prison Notebooks. New York: International Publishers.

Hanák Péter . 1967. “Hungary in the Austro–Hungarian Monarchy: Preponderancy or Dependency?Austrian History Yearbook 3 no. 1: 260302.

Ingrao Charles W. 1994. The Habsburg Monarchy 1618–1815. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Janos Andrew C. 1982. The Politics of Backwardness in Hungary 1825–1945. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Jászi Oszkár . 1964. The Dissolution of the Habsburg Monarchy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Judson Pieter M. 1996. Exclusive Revolutionaries: Liberal Politics Social Experience and National Identity in the Austrian Empire 1848–1914. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Judson Pieter M. 2016. The Habsburg Empire: A New History. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Kaps Klemens . 2008. “Gescheitertes Aufholen in Zentraleuropa. Der Abstieg der Habsburgermonarchie zu einem semiperipheren Wirtschaftsraum im Spiegel ihrer Außenhandelsstruktur 1791–1880.” Zeitschrift für Weltgeschichte 9 no. 1: 103122.

Koch Klaus . 1989. “Österreich und der Deutsche Zollverein (1848–1871).” In Die Habsburgermonarchie 1848–1918 vol. 6/1: Die Habsburgermonarchie im System der internationalen Beziehungen edited by Wandruszka Adam and Urbanitsch Peter 537559. Vienna: VöAW.

Komlos John . 1983. The Habsburg Monarchy as a Customs Union: Economic Development in Austria–Hungary in the Nineteenth Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Komlosy Andrea . 2003. Grenze und ungleiche regionale Entwicklung: Binnenmarkt und Migration in der Habsburgermonarchie. Vienna: Promedia.

Komlosy Andrea . 2004. “State, Regions, and Borders: Single Market Formation and Labor Migration in the Habsburg Monarchy, 1750–1918.” Fernand Braudel Center Review 27 no. 2: 135177.

Komlosy Andrea . 2015. “Imperial Cohesion, National-Building, and Regional Integration in the Habsburg Monarchy?” In Nationalizing Empires edited by Miller Alexei and Berger Stefan 369427. Budapest: Central European University Press.

Kwan Jonathan . 2013. Liberalism and the Habsburg Monarchy 1861–1895. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lakatos Ernő . 1942. A magyar politikai vezetőreteg 1848–1918 [The leading political stratum in Hungary 1848–1918] . Budapest.

Macartney C.A. 1969. The Habsburg Empire 1790–1918. New York: Macmillan.

Mann Michael . 1993. The Sources of Social Power: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mielants Eric . 2007. The Origins of Capitalism and “The Rise of the West.” Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Miller Alexei and Rieber Alfred J. . 2004. Imperial Rule. Budapest: Central European University.

Nolte Hans-Heinrich . 1980. “Zur Stellung Osteuropas im internationalen System der Frühen Neuzeit. Außenhandel und Sozialgeschichte bei der Bestimmung der Regionen.” Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas 28 no. 2: 161197.

Nolte Hans-Heinrich . 1995. “Internal Peripheries: From Andalucia to Tatarstan.” Fernand Braudel Center Review 18 no. 2: 261280.

Nolte Hans-Heinrich . 2004. “The Modern World-System and Area Studies: The Case of Russia.” Fernand Braudel Center Review 27 no. 3: 207242.

Pap József . 2007. “‘Két választás Magyarországon’: az országgyűlési képviselők társadalmi összetétele a 20. század első éveiben[“Two elections in Hungary”: The social composition of the members of parliament at the beginning of the twentieth century]. AETAS 22 no. 1: 531.

Rosenberg Justin . 2006. “Why Is There No International Historical Sociology?European Journal of International Relations 12 no. 3: 307340.

Rosenberg Justin . 2013. “Kenneth Waltz and Leon Trotsky: Anarchy in the Mirror of Uneven and Combined Development.” International Politics 50 no. 2: 183230.

Péter László . 1992. “The Aristocracy, the Gentry and Their Parliamentary Tradition in Nineteenth-Century Hungary.” The Slavonic and East-European Review 70 no. 1: 77110.

Schulze Max-Stephan . 2007a. “Origins of Catch-Up Failure: Comparative Productivity Growth in the Habsburg Empire, 1870–1910.” European Review of Economic History 11 no. 2: 189218.

Schulze Max-Stephan . 2007b. “Regional Income Dispersion and Market Potential in the Late Nineteenth Century Hapsburg Empire.” Working paper no. 106/2007 Department of Economic History London School of Economics November 2007. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/22311.

Seton-Watson Hugh . 1990. The Russian Empire 1801–1917. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Sked Alan . 1992. The Decline and Fall of the Habsburg Empire 1815–1918. London: Longman.

Skocpol Theda . 1977. “Wallerstein’s World Capitalist System: A Theoretical and Historical Critique.” American Journal of Sociology 82 no. 5: 10751090.

Somogyi Éva . 2007. “A dualizmus államrendszere. Negyven év után a kiegyezésről” [The dualist state system: On the Settlement forty years later]. In A Monarchia kora – ma [The period of the Monarchy today] edited by Gerő András 109121. Budapest: úMK.

Stein Lorenz von . 1856. Oesterreich und der Frieden. Vienna: Braumüller.

Szűcs Jenő . 1983. “The Three Historical Regions of Europe: An Outline.” Acta Historica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 29 no. 2/4: 131184.

Taylor A.J.P. 1965. The Habsburg Monarchy 1809–1918: A History of the Austrian Empire and Austria–Hungary. New York: Harper Torchbooks.

Teschke Benno . 2014. “ IR Theory, Historical Materialism, and the False Promise of International Historical Sociology.” Spectrum: Journal of Global Studies 6 no. 1: 166.

Wallerstein Immanuel . 1980. Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy 1600–1750. New York: Academic Press.

Wallerstein Immanuel . 1984. The Politics of the World-Economy: The States the Movements and the Civilizations; Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wallerstein Immanuel . 1989. The Second Era of Great Expansion of the Capitalist World-Economy 1730–1840s. San Diego: Academic Press.

Wallerstein Immanuel . 1991. The Capitalist World-Economy: Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wallerstein Immanuel . 2011. “Prologue to the 2011 Edition.” In The Capitalist World System I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Centuryxvii–xxx. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 23 23 18
Full Text Views 18 18 17
PDF Downloads 6 6 4
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0