State Socialist Experts in Transnational Perspective. East European Circulation of Knowledge during the Cold War (1950s–1980s): Introduction to the Thematic Issue
In: East Central EuropeSearch for other papers by Bogdan C. Iacob in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Corina Doboș in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Raluca Grosescu in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Viviana Iacob in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Vlad Pașca in
Current site
Google Scholar
State socialist experts were at the center of Eastern Europe’s internationalization from the mid-1950s until 1989. They acted as intermediaries between their states and other national, regional, and international environments. The contributions integrate national milieus within broader frameworks mostly circumscribed by inter- and nongovernmental specialized organizations (the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe; the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; International Theater Institute, or the un Commission on Population and Development). The issue is an innovative initiative to identify within four fields (economy, demography, theatre, and historical studies) state socialist experts’ contributions to international debates and institution building. We argue that these groups were fundamentally characterized by their transnational dynamism. The resultant forms of mobility and transfer resituate specific systems of knowledge production from Eastern Europe within the larger story of postwar globalization. The collection also includes an anthropological study about the internationalization trajectories of lower-ranked professionals and the resilience of their expertise ethics after 1989. Socialist experts’ mobilities can be circumscribed at the intersection of multiple phenomena that defined the postwar: national settings’ impact on inter- and supra-state interactions; Cold War politics; the tribulations of international organizations; and global trends determined by the accelerating interconnectedness of the world and decolonization. Our findings de-center established narratives about the Cold War and they show how representatives from the East participated in and sometimes determined the conditions of Europeanizing and globalizing trends in their respective fields within particular organizations.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Antic Ana , Conterio Johanna , and Vargha Dora . 2016 “Conclusion: Beyond Liberal Internationalism.” Special issue “Agents of Internationalism.” Contemporary European History 25, no. 2: 359–371.
-
Apor Peter , and Iordachi Constantin . 2013. “Studying Communist Dictatorships: From Comparative to Transnational History.” East Central Europe 40, nos. 1–2: 1–35.
-
Babiracki Patryk , and Jersild Austin , eds. 2016. Socialist Internationalism in the Cold War. Exploring the Second World. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
-
Babiracki Patryk , and Zimmer Kenyon , eds. Cold War Crossings. International Travel and Exchange across the Soviet Bloc, 1940s–1960s. Arlington: Texas A&M University Press.
-
Balme Christopher . 2017. “Theatrical Institutions in Motion: Developing Theatre in the Postcolonial Era.” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 31, no. 2 (Spring): 125–140.
-
Barnet Michael , and Finnemore Martha . 2004. Rules for the World . International Organizations in Global Politics. London: Cornell University Press.
-
Beissinger Mark . 1988. Scientific Management, Socialist Discipline, and Soviet Power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
-
Bockmann Johanna . 2011. Markets in the Name of Socialism: The Left-Wing Origins of Neoliberalism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
-
Bott Sandra , Hanhimäki Jussi M. , Schaufelbuehl Janick Marina , and Wyss Marco , eds. 2016. Neutrality and Neutralism in the Global Cold War. Between or Within the Blocs? London. Routledge.
-
Cooper Frederick , and Packard Randall , eds. 1998. International Development and the Social Sciences . Essays on the History and Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.
-
Cull Nicholas J. 2010. “Reading, Viewing, and Tuning into the Cold War .” InThe Cambridge History of the Cold War. Volume ii Crisis and Détente, edited by Leffler Melvyn P. and Westad Odd Arne , 438–459. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
-
David-Fox Michael . 2010. “Transnational History and the East–West Divide.” In Imagining the West in Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union, edited by Péteri György , 258–268. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press.
-
Engerman David . 2011. “The Second World’s Third World.” Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History 12, no. 1: 183–211.
-
Engerman David . 2009. Know Your Enemy . The Rise and Fall of America’s Soviet Experts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Iacob Bogdan C . 2016. “Southeast European Studies during the Cold War: Aspects of International Institutionalization (1960s‑1970s).” N.E.C. Ştefan Odobleja Program Yearbook 2014–2015, 21–52. Bucharest: New Europe College.
-
Scott-Smith Giles , and Krabbendam Hans , eds. 2003. The Cultural Cold War in Western Europe 1945–1960. London: Frank Cass.
-
Haas Peter M . 1992. “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination.” International Organization 46, no. 1. Special issue “Knowledge, Power, and International Policy Coordination.” (Winter): 1–35.
-
Hecht Gabrielle ed. 2013. Entangled Geographies. Empire and Technopolitics in the Global Cold War. Cambridge: MIT Press.
-
Heilbron Johan , Guilhot Nicolas , and Jeanpierre Laurent . 2008. “Toward a Transnational History of the Social Sciences.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 44, no. 2: 146–160.
-
Iriye Akira . 2013. “Historicizing the Cold War.” In The Oxford Handbook of the Cold War, edited by Immerman Richard H. and Goedde Petra , 15–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Iriye Akira . 2002. Global Community . The Role of International Organizations in the Making of the Contemporary World. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
-
Kohlrausch Martin , Steffen Katrin , and Wiederkehr Stefan , eds. 2010. Expert Cultures in Central Eastern Europe. The Internationalization of Knowledge and the Transformation of Nation States since World War i. Osnabrück: Fibre Verlag.
-
Konrád George , and Szelényi Ivan . 1979. The Intellectuals on the Road to Class Power. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
-
Kott Sandrine . 2011. “International Organizations: A Field of Research for a Global History.” Studies in Contemporary History 8: 446–450.
-
Littoz-Monnet Annabelle . 2017. “Production and Uses of Expertise by International Bureaucracies.” In The Politics of Expertise in International Organizations: How International Bureaucracies Produce and Mobilize Knowledge, edited by Littoz-Monnet Annabelle , 1–18. London: Routledge.
-
Lowit Thomas . 1979. “Le parti polymorphe en Europe de l’Est.” Revue Française de Science Politique 29, nos. 4–6: 812–846.
-
Mark James , Kalinovsky Artemy , and Marung Steffi , eds. 2018. Alternative Globalizations: Eastern Europe and the Postcolonial World. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. (forthcoming)
-
Middell Matthias , and Naumann Katja . 2010. “Global History and the Spatial Turn: From the Impact of Area Studies to the Study of Critical Junctures of Globalization.” Journal of Global History 5: 149–170.
-
Mikkonen Simo , and Koivunen Pia , eds. 2015. Entangled Histories of Cold War Europe. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
-
Péteri György . 2012. “Sites of Convergence: The ussr and Communist Eastern Europe at International Fairs Abroad and at Home,” Journal of Contemporary History 47, no. 1: 3–12.
-
Reinisch Jessica . 2016. “Introduction.” Special issue “Agents of Internationalism,” Contemporary European History 25, no. 2: 195–205.
-
Romano Angela , and Romero Federico , eds. 2014. Special issue, “European Socialist Regimes Facing Globalisation and European Co-operation: Dilemmas and Responses.” European Review of History 21, no. 2.
-
Scott-Smith Giles , and Krabbendam Hans , eds. 2003. The Cultural Cold War in Western Europe 1945–1960. London: Frank Cass.
-
Sluga Glenda . 2013. Internationalism in the Age of Nationalism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
-
Sluga Glenda . 2011. “The Transnational History of International Institutions.” Journal of Global History 6: 219–222.
-
Theen Rudolf H.W. 1980. “Party and Bureaucracy.” In Public Policy and Administration in the Soviet Union, edited by Smith Gordon B. , 18–52. New York: Praeger.
-
Verdery Katherine . 1991. National Ideology under Socialism: Identity and Cultural Politics in Ceausescu’s Romania. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Vowinckel Annette , Payk Marcus M. , and Lindenbeger Thomas , eds. 2012. Cold War Cultures. Perspectives on Eastern and Western European Societies. Oxford: Berghan Books.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1642 | 345 | 37 |
| Full Text Views | 167 | 5 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 222 | 16 | 6 |
State Socialist Experts in Transnational Perspective. East European Circulation of Knowledge during the Cold War (1950s–1980s): Introduction to the Thematic Issue
In: East Central EuropeSearch for other papers by Bogdan C. Iacob in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Corina Doboș in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Raluca Grosescu in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Viviana Iacob in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Vlad Pașca in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
State socialist experts were at the center of Eastern Europe’s internationalization from the mid-1950s until 1989. They acted as intermediaries between their states and other national, regional, and international environments. The contributions integrate national milieus within broader frameworks mostly circumscribed by inter- and nongovernmental specialized organizations (the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe; the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; International Theater Institute, or the un Commission on Population and Development). The issue is an innovative initiative to identify within four fields (economy, demography, theatre, and historical studies) state socialist experts’ contributions to international debates and institution building. We argue that these groups were fundamentally characterized by their transnational dynamism. The resultant forms of mobility and transfer resituate specific systems of knowledge production from Eastern Europe within the larger story of postwar globalization. The collection also includes an anthropological study about the internationalization trajectories of lower-ranked professionals and the resilience of their expertise ethics after 1989. Socialist experts’ mobilities can be circumscribed at the intersection of multiple phenomena that defined the postwar: national settings’ impact on inter- and supra-state interactions; Cold War politics; the tribulations of international organizations; and global trends determined by the accelerating interconnectedness of the world and decolonization. Our findings de-center established narratives about the Cold War and they show how representatives from the East participated in and sometimes determined the conditions of Europeanizing and globalizing trends in their respective fields within particular organizations.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1642 | 345 | 37 |
| Full Text Views | 167 | 5 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 222 | 16 | 6 |