Surveillance Society: From Communist Czechoslovakia to Contemporary Western Democracies
In: East Central EuropeSearch for other papers by Muriel Blaive in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Surveillance was long considered one of the main characteristics of communist rule. The ubiquitous presence of the secret police and its informants, citizens who would spy on their own family, friends, and colleagues, was one trait that was considered almost consubstantial to the exercise of communist repression. The regimes paralyzed the people by mobilizing fear: fear of repression, but also fear of the West, and fear of capitalism. But the participation of large chunks of society to this control culture, as well as its high level of conformism, progressively led to the postulate that the communist domination is no more than one particular avatar of modern society. Such an approach revives the notion of individual choice and that of social actors. As dissident thinkers underlined it, it would have been enough for people to question the official dogma, by refusing to live in a lie, for the regimes to collapse. However, surveillance practices have been studied also in Western countries in the past decades. And the recent coronavirus crisis shows yet again that the use of fear in politics is not a prerogative of communist regimes only. We can observe how potent fear is, also in our democracies, as a motivator of individual behavior and extractor of conformism. The ongoing coronavirus pandemic has increased the visibility of state and corporate surveillance, yet this new reality has garnered the massive support of the wider public. In fact, it has largely been a demand on the part of a fearful citizenry, who has voluntarily complied to this new surveillance and self-surveillance model. The communist experience should warn us that surveillance leads to censorship and, even more importantly, to a change of behavior. But the current Covid situation should also lead us to reinterpret the degree of sincerity of social actors under communism: we now see that fear can lead to curtailing freedoms with the willing participation of a large part of society.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Adler, Yuval. 2013. Bethlehem. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt2915160/.
-
Agamben, Giorgio. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
-
Agamben, Giorgio. 2005. State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
-
Balázs, Apor et al. 2018. “Cultural Opposition: Concepts and Approaches.” In The Handbook of courage: Cultural Opposition and Its Heritage in Eastern Europe, edited by Balázs Apor et al., 9–26. Budapest: Institute of History, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
-
Arntsen, Björn, and Lisbet Holtedahl. 2005. “Visualizing Situatedness. The Role of the Audience/Reader in Knowledge Production.” In Challenging Situatedness. Gender, Culture, and the Production of Knowledges, edited by Ericka Engelstad and Siri Gerrad, 67–83. Utrecht: Eburon.
-
Behrent, Michael C. 2013. “Penser le vingtième siècle avec Michel Foucault.” Revue d’histoire moderne et contemporaine 60, nos. 4–5: 7–28.
-
Blaive, Muriel, ed. 2018. Perceptions of Society in Communist Europe: Regime Archives and Popular Opinion. London: Bloomsbury.
-
Bloch, Marc. 1953. The Historian’s Craft: Reflections on the Nature and Uses of History and the Techniques and Methods of Those Who Write It. New York: Vintage.
-
Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary and Thesaurus. 2008. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Bolton, Jonathan. 2012. Worlds of Dissent: Charter 77, The Plastic People of the Universe, and Czech Culture under Communism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
-
Chambers, Madeline. 2022. “Germans Snitch on Neighbors Flouting Virus Rules, in Echo of the Stasi Past.” Reuters, 2 April. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-germany-denunciati-idUSKBN21K2PB.
-
Christfis, Angelique. 2022. “Macron Rebuke to Unvaccinated Citizens Incurs Anger in Parliament.” The Guardian, 5 January. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jan/05/macron-rebuke-to-unvaccinated-citizens-incurs-anger-in-parliament.
-
Combe, Sonia. 1994. Archives interdites. Les peurs françaises face à l’histoire contemporaine. Paris: Albin Michel.
-
Combe, Sonia. 1999. Une société sous surveillance: les intellectuels et la Stasi. Paris: Albin Michel.
-
Combe, Sonia. 2018. “Who is Afraid of Whom? The Case of the ’Loyal Dissidents’ in the German Democratic Republic.” In Perceptions of Society in Communist Europe. Regime Archives and Popular Opinion, edited by Muriel Blaive, 141–158. London: Bloomsbury.
-
Combe, Sonia. 2019. La loyauté à tout prix. Les floués du “socialisme reel.” Lormont: Le bord de l’eau.
-
Dale, Gareth. 2005. Popular Protest in East Germany, 1945–1989. London: Routledge.
-
Editorial Board. 2021. “How Fauci and Collins Shut Down Covid Debate.” Wall Street Journal, 21 December. https://www.wsj.com/articles/fauci-collins-emails-great-barrington-declaration-covid-pandemic-lockdown-11640129116.
-
Estes, Adam Clark.12 May 2017. “Don’t Buy Anyone an Echo.” Gizmodo, 12 May. https://gizmodo.com/dont-buy-anyone-an-echo-1820981732.
-
Falk, Barbara. 2011. “Resistance and Dissent in Central and Eastern Europe. An Emerging Historiography.” Eastern European Politics and Societies 25, no. 2: 321–322.
-
Fitzpatrick, Sheila. 1999. Everyday Stalinism: Ordinary Life in Extraordinary Times: Soviet Russia in the 1930s. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Foucault, Michel. 1961. Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique. Paris: Gallimard.
-
Foucault, Michel. 1975. Surveiller et punir. Paris: Gallimard.
-
Foucault, Michel. 1978–1984. Histoire de la sexualité. Vols. 1–3. Paris: Gallimard.
-
Fulbrook, Mary, ed. 2009. Power and Society in the gdr, 1961–1979: The “Normalisation of Rule?” New York: Berghahn.
-
Galič, Maša, Tjerk Timan, and Bert-Jaap Koops. 2017. “Bentham, Deleuze, and Beyond: An Overview of Surveillance Theories from the Panopticon to Participation.” Philosophy & Technology 30: 9–37.
-
Gieseke, Jens. 2014. “The Stasi and East German Society: Some Remarks on Current Research.” ghi Bulletin Supplement 9: 59–72.
-
Goldman, Wendy Z. 2011. Inventing the Enemy: Denunciation and Terror in Stalin’s Russia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
-
Grémion, Pierre. 1989. Preuves: une revue européenne à Paris. Paris: Julliard.
-
Grémion, Pierre. 1995. Intelligence de l’anticommunisme. Le Congrès pour la liberté de la culture à Paris 1950–1975. Paris: Fayard.
-
Gordon, James.9 July 2022. “‘The lil bird and I are now the best of friends’: Journalist Alex Berenson returns to Twitter as social media giant admits he shouldn’t have been banned for questioning covid vaccines.” Daily Mail, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10996987/Journalist-Alex-Berenson-reinstated-Twitter-suing-violation-Amendment.html.
-
Haggerty, Kevin D. and Richard V. Ericson. 2006. “Introduction.” In The New Politics of Surveillance and Visibility, edited by Kevin D. Haggerty and Richard V. Ericson, 3–26. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
-
Harari, Yuval Noah. 2020. “The World after Coronavirus.” Financial Times, 20 March. https://www.ft.com/content/19d90308-6858-11ea-a3c9-1fe6fedcca75.
-
Harari, Yuval Noah, 2021. “Lessons from a Year of Covid.” Financial Times, 26 February. https://www.ft.com/content/f1b30f2c-84aa-4595-84f2-7816796d6841.
-
Havel, Václav. 1985. “The Power of the Powerless.” In The Power of the Powerless: Citizens Against the State in Central-Eastern Europe, edited by John Keane, 23–96. London: Hutchinson.
-
Havel, Václav. 1987. Three Vaněk Plays: Audience, Protest, Unveiling. London: Faber & Faber [Czech original 1978].
-
Huguenin, Duane. 2011. “Les jeunes, l’Ouest et la police secrète tchécoslovaque.” Vingtième siècle, no. 109: 183–200.
-
Irving, John. 1978. The World According to Garp. New York: Ballantines.
-
Jirec, Miroslav. 2001. “Dvě piva, někdy třeba i zavináč. Kádrový dotazník Miroslava Jirce.” In Kádrový dotazník, edited by Petr Placák, 141–163. Prague: Babylon.
-
Jones, Sara. 2011. Complicity, Censorship, and Criticism: Negotiating Space in the gdr Literary Sphere. Berlin: De Gruyter.
-
Julian, Isaac. 2013. Playtime. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt6808782/.
-
Kapaló, James. 2019. “Surveillance, Collaboration, and the Secret Police in Romania.” In New Exploratory Phase in Research on East European Cultures of Dissent: Joint Review Report: Report prepared by the participants of the cost Action ca 16213, edited by Maciej Maryl et al., 47–51. Warsaw: Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences.
-
Kotkin, Stephen. 1995. Magnetic Mountain: Stalinism as a Civilization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
-
Kott, Sandrine. 2014. Communism Day-to-Day: State Enterprises in East German Society. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press [first French edition 2001].
-
Lindenberger, Thomas. 1999. “Die Diktatur der Grenzen. Zur Einleitung.” In Herrschaft und Eigen-Sinn in der Diktatur. Studien zur Gesellschaftsgeschichte der ddr, edited by Thomas Lindenberger, 13–43. Cologne: Böhlau.
-
Lindenberger, Thomas. 2003. Volkspolizei. Herrschaftspraxis und öffentliche Ordnung im sed-Staat 1952–1968. Cologne: Böhlau.
-
Lindenberger, Thomas. 2009. “Tacit Minimal Consensus: The Always Precarious East German Dictatorship.” In Popular Opinion in Totalitarian Regimes: Fascism, Nazism, Communism, edited by Paul Corner, 208–222. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
Lüdtke, Alf, ed. 1995. The History of Everyday Life: Reconstructing Historical Experiences and Ways of Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
-
Luthi, Susannah. 2022. “Twitter Loses Bid to Toss Alex Berenson’s Lawsuit.” Politico, 30 April. https://www.politico.com/news/2022/04/30/twitter-loses-bid-to-toss-alex-berenson-lawsuit-00029131.
-
Lyon, David. 1994. The Electronic Eye: The Rise of Surveillance Society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
-
Lyon, David. 2001. Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
-
Lyon, David. 2017. “Surveillance Culture: Engagement, Exposure, and Ethics in Digital Modernity.” International Journal of Communication 11: 824–842.
-
MacAskill, Ewen, and Alex Hern. 2018. “Edward Snowden: ‘The People Are Still Powerless but Now They’re Aware.’” The Guardian, 4 June. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2018/jun/04/edward-snowden-people-still-powerless-but-aware.
-
Makarius, Milena. 2020. Alias Janna. Paris: Anne Carrière.
-
Marx, Gary T. 2002. “What’s New about the ‘New Surveillance’? Classifying for Change and Continuity.” Surveillance and Society 1, no. 1: 9–29.
-
Meillassoux, Marc. 2017. Nothing to Hide. https://vimeo.com/189016018.
-
Maryl, Maciej, and Piotr Wcislik, eds. 2022. New Exploratory Phase in Research on East European Cultures of Dissent: Joint Review Report: Report prepared by the participants of the cost Action ca 16213. Warsaw: Institute of Literary Research of the Polish Academy of Sciences.
-
Milgram, Stanley. 1974. Obedience to Authority. New York: Harper & Row.
-
Mlynář, Zdeněk. 1984. “What ‘Actually-Existing Socialism’ Does to People.” In The Restoration of Order: The Normalization of Czechoslovakia 1969–1976, preface to Milan Šimečka, 6–11. London: Verso.
-
Oates-Indruchová, Libora. 2020. Censorship in Czech and Hungarian Academic Publishing, 1969–89. Snakes and Ladders. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
-
Onishi, Norimitsu. 2022. “Using Harsh Language, Macron Issues a Challenge to the Unvaccinated.” New York Times, 5 January https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/05/world/europe/macron-france-unvaccinated.html.
-
Panatoyova, Bojina. 2018. I See Red People. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8053490/.
-
Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.
-
Shore, Marci. 2012. “‘A Spectre is Haunting Europe…’ Dissidents, Intellectuals, and a New Generation.” In The End and the Beginning: The Revolutions of 1989 and the Resurgence of History, edited by Vladimir Tismaneanu and Bogdan C. Iacob, 465–493. Budapest: CEU Press.
-
Šimečka, Milan. 1984. The Restoration of Order: The Normalization of Czechoslovakia 1969–1976. London: Verso.
-
Škvorecký, Josef. 2001. Two Murders in My Double Life. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux [Czech original 1996].
-
Svenonius, Ola, and Fredrika Björkhund. 2018. “Explaining Attitudes to Secret Surveillance in Post-Communist Societies.” East European Politics 34, no. 2: 123–151.
-
Tomin, Zdena, and Christine Nulty. 1983. “The Crane Bag.” Socialism & Culture 7, no. 1: 119–121.
-
Vatulescu, Cristina. 2010. Police Aesthetics: Literature, Film, and the Secret Police in Soviet Times. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
-
Verdery, Katherine. 2018. My Life as a Spy: Investigations in a Secret Police File. Durham: Duke University Press.
-
Vulliamy, Ed. 2020. ”’Rockers and Spies’ – How the cia Used Culture to Shred the Iron Curtain.” The Guardian, 3 May. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/may/03/rockers-and-spies-how-the-cia-used-culture-to-shred-the-iron-curtain.
-
Woods, Caroline. 2022. The Lunar Housewife. New York: Doubleday.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 740 | 236 | 23 |
| Full Text Views | 45 | 19 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 101 | 43 | 3 |
Surveillance Society: From Communist Czechoslovakia to Contemporary Western Democracies
In: East Central EuropeSearch for other papers by Muriel Blaive in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Surveillance was long considered one of the main characteristics of communist rule. The ubiquitous presence of the secret police and its informants, citizens who would spy on their own family, friends, and colleagues, was one trait that was considered almost consubstantial to the exercise of communist repression. The regimes paralyzed the people by mobilizing fear: fear of repression, but also fear of the West, and fear of capitalism. But the participation of large chunks of society to this control culture, as well as its high level of conformism, progressively led to the postulate that the communist domination is no more than one particular avatar of modern society. Such an approach revives the notion of individual choice and that of social actors. As dissident thinkers underlined it, it would have been enough for people to question the official dogma, by refusing to live in a lie, for the regimes to collapse. However, surveillance practices have been studied also in Western countries in the past decades. And the recent coronavirus crisis shows yet again that the use of fear in politics is not a prerogative of communist regimes only. We can observe how potent fear is, also in our democracies, as a motivator of individual behavior and extractor of conformism. The ongoing coronavirus pandemic has increased the visibility of state and corporate surveillance, yet this new reality has garnered the massive support of the wider public. In fact, it has largely been a demand on the part of a fearful citizenry, who has voluntarily complied to this new surveillance and self-surveillance model. The communist experience should warn us that surveillance leads to censorship and, even more importantly, to a change of behavior. But the current Covid situation should also lead us to reinterpret the degree of sincerity of social actors under communism: we now see that fear can lead to curtailing freedoms with the willing participation of a large part of society.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 740 | 236 | 23 |
| Full Text Views | 45 | 19 | 1 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 101 | 43 | 3 |