Friedrich Engels claimed that communism would eliminate criminality. With “exploitative” capitalist societal conditions removed, there would no longer be any material or psychological reasons for people to commit crime. The reality in the Eastern Bloc in the late Cold War was, however, very different. Petty theft was a particular problem area. Citizens filched alcohol from supermarkets, bricks from construction sites, and money from colleagues’ lockers on an epidemic scale.
This article employs archival and oral history evidence to examine petty theft in the German Democratic Republic (gdr). Scholars have generally attributed its occurrence to “economy of scarcity conditions,” that is, citizens stole items that were in short supply or not on general sale. This article, however, considers whether petty theft constituted a challenge to socialist rule since this crime contravened state ideology. It finds evidence that a desire to defy the state did motivate some citizens to steal, but that the majority of thefts were inspired by more prosaic reasons. The analysis does show, however, that citizens mocked and dismissed the concept of People’s Property, thereby rejecting a central tenet of the regime’s political project.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Archival Sources (in order of appearance in text)
Bundesarchiv (German Federal Archives)
BArch, do 1/21486. “Die nächsten Aufgaben zur Erläuterung des sozialistischen Rechts sowie zur Festigung und weiteren Entwicklung des Rechtsbewußtseins der Werktätigen, 17. Apr. 1974”.
BArch do 1/92986. “Information über die Entwicklung der Kriminalität im Jahr 1966”.
BArch dp 1/59593. “Die Entwicklung und wirksame Bekämpfung der Kriminalität, 1976–79”.
BArch, dp 3/1530. “Bericht über die Entwicklung und Bekämpfung der Kriminalität seit dem xi. Parteitag der sed, 1989”.
BArch da 1/2948. “14. Sitzung des Jugendausschusses am 19. Jan. 1962”.
BArch, dp 3/277. “Bericht über die Entwicklung und Bekämpfung der Kriminalität im Jahre 1971.”
Landesarchiv Berlin (Berlin State Archive)
The “C Rep 334” holding in the Landesarchiv Berlin (lab) contains the files of several East Berlin Dispute Commissions. In the text they appear with the file number and the date of the Commission hearing, for example: “lab c Rep 334/39, 25.7.75.”
Brandenburgisches Landeshauptarchiv (Brandenburg Main State Archive)
The “481” holding in the Brandenburgisches Landeshauptarchiv (blha) contains the files of the Regional Courts (kg) of Brandenburg, wherein the Dispute Commission files can be found. In the text, they appear with the file number, name of the Regional Court, and the date of the Commission hearing, for example: “blha 481 kg Potsdam-Stadt 4, 14.2.78.”
Allinson, Mark. 2009. “1977: The gdr’s Most Normal Year?” In Power and Society in the gdr: 1961–1979, edited by Mary Fulbrook, 253–278. New York: Berghahn.
Altehenger, Jennifer. 2021. Legal Lessons: Popularizing Laws in the People’s Republic of China, 1949–1989. Boston: Harvard University Press.
“Arbeiter und Hausfrauen sprechen Recht.” 1963. Neue Zeit, July 4, 1963, 8.
Bähr, Johannes. 1999. “Institutionenordnung und Wirtschaftsentwicklung. Die Wirtschaftsgeschichte der ddr aus der Sicht des zwischendeutschen Vergleichs.” Geschichte Und Gesellschaft 25: 530–555.
Betts, Paul. 2009. “Private Property and Public Culture: A Forgotten Chapter of East European Communist Life.” Histoire@Politique 7. https://www.cairn.info/revue-histoire-politique-2009-1-page-2.htm.
Betts, Paul. 2012. Within Walls: Private Life in the German Democratic Republic. Oxford: oup.
Brauer, Juliane. 2012. “Clashes of Emotions: Punk Music, Youth Subculture, and Authority in the gdr (1978–1983).” Social Justice 38: 53–70.
Brothers, Eric. 2000. “Issues Surrounding the Development of the Neo-Nazi Scene in East Berlin.” European Judaism: A Journal for the New Europe 33: 45–50.
Buchholz, Erich. 1983. “Zur Diskussion: Zu den Ursachen der Kriminalität in der ddr.” Neue Justiz 37: 199–201.
Bundeskriminalamt. 1955–1990. Polizeiliche Kriminalstatistik: Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Bundeskriminalamt. https://www.bka.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Publikationen/PolizeilicheKriminalstatistik/pksJahrbuecherBis2011/pks1955.html.
Cadiot, Juliette. 2021. La société des voleurs – Propriété et socialisme sous Stalin: Propriété et socialisme sous Staline. Paris: Éditions ehess.
Chesney-Lind, Meda. 1986. “‘Women and Crime’: The Female Offender.” Signs 12: 78–96.
de la Motte, Bruni. 2009. “East Germans Lost Much in 1989.” The Guardian, November 8, 2009. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2009/nov/08/1989-berlin-wall.
Dölling, Birger. 2009. Strafvollzug zwischen Wende und Wiedervereinigung. Berlin: Links.
Dornberger, Gerhard. 1952. “Die verschiedenen Eigentumsarten und Eigentumsformen und das Eigentumsrecht in der ddr.” Neue Justiz 1: 16–21.
Engels, Friedrich. 1990. “Zwei Reden in Elberfeld.” Marx-Engels Werke. Vol. 2, by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, 536–557. Berlin: Dietz Verlag.
Falk, Barbara J. 2011. “Resistance and Dissent in Central and Eastern Europe: An Emerging Historiography.” East European Politics and Societies 25: 318–360.
Fenemore, Mark. 2007. Sex, Thugs and Rock ‘n’ Roll: Teenage Rebels in Cold-War East Germany. New York: Berghahn Books.
Firlit, Elzbieta, and Jerzy Chlopecki. 1992. “When Theft is Not Theft.” In The Unplanned Society: Poland During and After Communism, edited by Janine Wedel, 95–109. New York: Columbia University Press.
Flowers, Ronald B. 1995. Female Crime, Criminals, and Cellmates: An Exploration of Female Criminality and Delinquency. London: McFarland & Co.
Freedman, Paul. 2015. “Luxury Dining in the Later Years of the German Democratic Republic.” In Becoming East German, edited by Mary Fulbrook and Andrew I. Port, 179–201. New York: Berghahn Books.
Fulbrook, Mary. 2005. The People’s State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Gehrig, Sebastian. 2021. Legal Entanglements. Law, Rights, and the Battle for Legitimacy in Divided Germany, 1945–1989. New York: Berghahn Books.
Heß, Pamela. 2015. “Mehr Gemeinschaftsgefühl und ein stärkerer sozialer Zusammenhalt? Erinnerungen an die ddr als Potenzial für Generationenkonflikte.” Deutschland Archiv. http://www.bpb.de/203625.
Hignett, Kelly. 2016. “‘We Had to Become Criminals to Survive Under Communism!’ Testimonies of Petty Criminality and Everyday Morality in Late Socialist Central Europe.” In The Soviet Past in the Post Socialist Present: Methodology and Ethics in Russian, Baltic and Central European Oral History and Memory Studies, edited by Melanie Ilic and Dalia Leinarte, 199–216. London: Routledge.
Hirschfield A., and K. J. Bowers. 1997. “The Effect of Social Cohesion on Levels of Recorded Crime in Disadvantaged Areas.” Urban Studies 34: 1275–1295.
Hoffmann, Heinrich. 1950. “Volkeigentum ist unantastbar!” Neue Justiz 4: 209.
Janssen, Wiebke. 2010. Halbstarke in der ddr: Verfolgung und Kriminalisierung einer Jugendgruppe. Berlin: Ch. Links.
Judt, Matthias. 2013. “Bananen, gute Apfelsinen, Erdnüsse u.a. sind doch keine kapitalistischen Privilegien: Alltäglicher Mangel am Ende der 1980er Jahre in der ddr.” July 12, 2013. https://www.bpb.de/geschichte/zeitgeschichte/deutschlandarchiv/163470/bananen-gute-apfelsinen-erdnuesse-u-a-sind-doch-keine-kapitalistischen-privilegien.
Kirchhöfer, Dieter. 2000. “Der ostdeutsche Gemeinschaftssinn – Mythos oder Realität?” In Sozialisation zur Mitbürgerlichkeit, edited by H. P. Kuhn, H. Uhlendorff, and L. Krappmann. Wiesbaden: vs Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11425-3_9.
Kochan, Thomas. 2011. Blauer Würger: so trank die ddr. Berlin: Aufbau Verlag.
Koop, Volker. 2003. Der 17. Juni 1953: Legende und Wirklichkeit. Berlin: Siedler.
Korzilius, Sven. 2005. ‘Asoziale’ und ‘Parasiten’ im Recht der sbz/ddr. Cologne: Böhlau-Verlag.
Lee, Matthew R. 2000. “Community Cohesion and Violent Predatory Victimization: A Theoretical Extension and Cross-National Test of Opportunity Theory.” Social Forces 79, no. 2 (December): 683–706.
Lindenberger, Thomas. 1999. Herrschaft und Eigen-Sinn in der Diktatur. Studien zur Gesellschaftsgeschichte der ddr. Cologne: Böhlau.
Lindenberger, Thomas. 2015 “Eigen-Sinn, Domination and No Resistance.” Docupedia-Zeitgeschichte. August 3, 2015. http://docupedia.de/zg/Lindenberger_eigensinn_v1_en_2015.
Lüdtke, Alf. 1993. Eigen-Sinn. Fabrikalltag, Arbeitererfahrungen und Politik vom Kaiserreich bis in den Faschismus. Hamburg: Ergebnisse Verlag.
Major, Patrick. 2010. Behind the Berlin Wall. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Markovitz, Inga. 2010. Justice in Lüritz. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
McDougall, Alan. 2014. The People’s Game: Football, State and Society in East Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McLellan, Josie. 2011. Love in the Time of Communism: Intimacy and Sexuality in the gdr. Cambridge: cup.
Mertens, Lothar. 2001. Machtokkupation und Systemimplosion: Anfang und Ende der ddr, zehn Jahre danach. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.
Millington, Richard. 2017. “‘Crime Has No Chance’: The Discourse of Everyday Criminality in the East German Press, 1961–1989.” Central European History 50: 59–85.
Millington, Richard. 2020. “State Power and ‘Everyday Criminality’ in the German Democratic Republic, 1961–1989.” German History 38: 440–460.
Ministerium der Justiz. 1985. Leitfaden für Schiedskommissionen. Berlin: Staatsverlag der ddr.
Neller, Katja. 2006. ddr-Nostalgie: Dimensionen der Orientierungen der Ostdeutschen gegenüber der ehemaligen ddr, ihre Ursachen und politischen Konnotationen. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Nickel, Hildegard Maria. 1990. “Women in the gdr: Will Renewal Pass Them By?” Women in German Yearbook 6: 99–107.
Poiger, Uta. 2000. Jazz, Rock & Rebels: Cold War Politics and American Culture in a Divided Germany. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Port, Andrew I. 2013. “The Banalities of East German Historiography.” In Becoming East German: Socialist Structures and Sensibilities after Hitler, edited by Mary Fulbrook and Andrew I. Port, 1–30. New York: Berghahn.
Port, Andrew I. 2013. “East German Workers and the ‘Dark Side’ of Eigensinn: Divisive Shop-Floor Practices and the Failed Revolution of June 17, 1953.” In The East German Economy, 1945–2010: Falling Behind or Catching Up?, edited by Hartmut Berghoff and Uta Andrea Balbier, 111–128. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ross, Corey. 2002. The East German Dictatorship: Problems and Perspectives in the Interpretation of the gdr. London: Bloomsbury.
Rubin, Eli. 2009. “The Trabant: Consumption, Eigen-Sinn, and Movement.” History Workshop Journal 68: 27–44.
Rupieper, Hermann-Josef. 2003. “ . . . Und das Wichtigste ist doch die Einheit“ Der 17. Juni 1953 in den Bezirken Halle und Magdeburg. Münster: Lit.
Sanders, Bill. 2007. Youth Crime and Youth Culture in the Inner City. Oxford: Routledge.
Schevardo, Jennifer. 2006. Vom Wert des Notwendigen: Preispolitik und Lebensstandard in der ddr der fuenfziger Jahre. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.
Schneider, Rosemarie. 1996. “Das Verkehrswesen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Eisenbahn.” In Die wirtschaftliche und ökologische Situation der ddr in den 80er Jahren, edited by Hannsjörg F. Buck and Gunter Holzweißig, 177–222. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
Schultz, Helga. 2007. “Das sozialistische Projekt und die Arbeiter.” In Die ddr im Rückblick: Politik, Wirtschaft, Gesellschaft, Kultur, edited by Hans-Jürgen Wagener and Helga Schultz, 224–244. Berlin: Ch. Links.
Scott, James C. 1989 “Everyday Forms of Resistance.” Copenhagen Papers 4: 33–62.
Sperlich, Peter W. 2007. The East German Social Courts. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Staatliche Zentralverwaltung für Statistik, ed. 1956–1989. Statistisches Jahrbuch der ddr. Berlin: Staatsverlag der ddr. July 25, 2021. https://www.digizeitschriften.de/dms/toc/?PID=PPN514402644.
Steffensmeier, Darrell, and Emilie Allan. 1996. “Gender and Crime: Toward a Gendered Theory of Female Offending.” Annual Review of Sociology 22: 459–487.
Stock, Manfred. 1994. “Youth Culture in East Germany: From Symbolic Dropout to Politicization.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 27: 135–143.
Thalheim, Karl C. 1988. Die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung der beiden Staaten in Deutschland: Tatsachen und Zahlen. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
Ulmer, Jeffery T., and Darrell Steffensmeier. 2014. “The Age and Crime Relationship: Social Variation, Social Explanations.” In The Nurture Versus Biosocial Debate in Criminology: On the Origins of Criminal Behaviour and Criminality, edited by Kevin M. Beaver, J. C. Barnes, and Brian B. Boutwell, 377–396. Los Angeles: sage Publications Ltd. https://www.doi.org/10.4135/9781483349114.n24.
Vogler-Ludwig, Kurt. 1990. “Verdeckte Arbeitslosigkeit in der ddr.” ifo Schnelldienst 43, no. 24: 3–10. https://www.ifo.de/publikationen/1990/aufsatz-zeitschrift/verdeckte-arbeitslosigkeit-der-ddr.
Wahlen, Esther. 2017. “The Politics of Alcohol in Late Socialist Romania and Czechoslovakia.” PhD theses, European University Institute. https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/44971/Wahlen_2017.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Wesel, Uwe. 2001. Geschichte des Rechts. Von den Frühformen bis zur Gegenwart. Munich: C.H. Beck.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 117 | 117 | 24 |
Full Text Views | 75 | 75 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 114 | 114 | 3 |
Friedrich Engels claimed that communism would eliminate criminality. With “exploitative” capitalist societal conditions removed, there would no longer be any material or psychological reasons for people to commit crime. The reality in the Eastern Bloc in the late Cold War was, however, very different. Petty theft was a particular problem area. Citizens filched alcohol from supermarkets, bricks from construction sites, and money from colleagues’ lockers on an epidemic scale.
This article employs archival and oral history evidence to examine petty theft in the German Democratic Republic (gdr). Scholars have generally attributed its occurrence to “economy of scarcity conditions,” that is, citizens stole items that were in short supply or not on general sale. This article, however, considers whether petty theft constituted a challenge to socialist rule since this crime contravened state ideology. It finds evidence that a desire to defy the state did motivate some citizens to steal, but that the majority of thefts were inspired by more prosaic reasons. The analysis does show, however, that citizens mocked and dismissed the concept of People’s Property, thereby rejecting a central tenet of the regime’s political project.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 117 | 117 | 24 |
Full Text Views | 75 | 75 | 1 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 114 | 114 | 3 |