Understanding Public Policy as an Exception to the Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards

A South-Asian Perspective

in European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The paper, as the title suggests, aims at understanding and exploring the doctrine of public policy as a ground for refusing enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. Public Policy is one such ground provided in the New York Convention as well as in the uncitral Model Law, which is most often invoked in the national courts to challenge or refuse the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. What makes it more complicated is the lack of common world-wide definition of public policy or practice on its application, as the same varies from State to State. The traces of ambiguity, subjectivity (at the hands of the courts in terms of interpretation of the concept), and unpredictability associated with the concept of public policy have at times significantly thwarted the effectiveness and efficiency of international commercial arbitration. This paper attempts to understand and explore the enigma of public policy as an exception to the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. Apart from revisiting various scholarly works on this issue, interpretation of this concept by various judicial institutions across the globe (with special focus on India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka) has been attempted, followed by a comparative analysis, to analyse its application on the ground. This paper argues and suggests that a more desirable method of interpreting public policy, i.e. narrow interpretation, is the need of the hour, keeping in consideration the growing demands of international trade and commerce.

Understanding Public Policy as an Exception to the Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards

A South-Asian Perspective

in European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance

Sections

References

1

A.K.Qataishat‘Choice of law in International Commercial Arbitration’Indian Law Journal 3(3) (2010).

6

S. Sattar‘Enforcement of Arbitral Awards and Public Policy: Same Concept, Different Approach’ Transitional Dispute Management Journal 8(5) (2011).

12

R. FentimanInternational Commercial Litigation (Oxford: Oxford University Press2010) 114.

23

A. Okekeifere‘The Enforcement and Challenge of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Nigeria’Journal of International Arbitration 14(3) (1997).

25

A. J. van den BergThe New York Arbitration Convention of 1958 (Boston: Kluwer Law & Taxation Publishers1981).

26

R.A. Cole‘The Public Policy Exception to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbiral Awards’Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 1(2) (1986).

32

K.-M. Curtin‘Redefining Public Policy in International Arbitration of Mandatory National Laws’Defense Counsel Journal 64(2) (1997).

36

L. Mistelis‘Keeping the Unruly Horse in Control or Public Policy as a Bar to Enforcement of (Foreign) Arbitral Awards’International Law Forum Du Droit International 2(4) (2000).

40

J.F. Poudret and S. BessonComparative Law of International Arbitration (London: Sweet & Maxwell2007) 725.

53

Born (n 9) 2829.

64

F. Junitia‘Public Policy Exception In International Commercial Arbitration – Promoting Uniform Model Norms’Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 5(1) (2012).

76

J. Junker‘The Public Policy Defense to the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards’California West International Law Journal (1997) 7.

78

Born (n 9) 2859.

80

Born (n 9) 2860.

82

A.C. Renderio‘Indian Arbitration and "Public Policy’Texas Law Journal 89(3) (2011).

83

M. Ghani‘Court Assistance, Interim Measures, and Public Policy: India’s Perspective on International Commercial Arbitration’American Brief 2(1) (2012).

87

A. Gupta‘A New Dawn for India- Reducing Court Intervention in Enforcement of Foreign Awards’Indian Journal of Arbitration Law 2(2) (2013).

98

A.F.M. Maniruzzaman‘The New Law of International Commercial Arbitration in Bang­ladesh: A Comparative Perspective’American Review of International Arbitration 14 (2003).

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 59 59 28
Full Text Views 106 106 70
PDF Downloads 13 13 10
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0