Save

Challenging Western Legal Orientalism

A Comparative Analysis of Chinese Municipal Social Credit Systems

In: European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance
Authors:
Marta Infantino Associate Professor, University of Trieste, Department of Legal, Language, Interpreting and Translation Studies, Trieste, Italy, minfantino@units.it

Search for other papers by Marta Infantino in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Weiwei Wang Post-Doc Researcher, University of Trieste, Department of Legal, Language, Interpreting and Translation Studies, Trieste, Italy, wwang@units.it

Search for other papers by Weiwei Wang in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

In 2014 the Chinese State Council announced the establishment of a nationwide comprehensive social credit system. Western narratives often describe the initiative as a technologically enhanced tool of autocratic control for scoring people. Yet, as the paper aims to show, similar accounts are tainted by several misunderstandings which perpetuate Western orientalist postures towards Chinese law.

For the purpose of comparatively assessing the Chinese social credit system, the paper analyses the pilot programs set up to monitor people and enterprises’ behaviour by twenty-eight Chinese cities. The analysis will demonstrate that these pilot programs rely on low-tech methodologies, have limited strings attached, and are based on a relatively transparent legal framework. From a comparative perspective, our findings suggest that Chinese cities’ experiments raise problems that are similar to those posed by measurement practices widely employed in the West.

Content Metrics

All Time Past 365 days Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1386 146 17
Full Text Views 115 21 0
PDF Views & Downloads 269 43 0