Innovation in a Hybrid System: The Example of Nepal

in European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?


The Nepali legal tradition is a legal hybrid in many regards. Nepal was not colonised by a Western state, and the Hindu legal tradition therefore dominated all areas of law until the middle of the 20th century. Since the 1950s there has been a strong influence of Indian common law. It is probably for this reason that comparative classifications that include Nepal see the legal system as a mixture of common law and customary law. However, other mixtures mark the Nepali legal tradition. French law inspired the ruler in the 19th century, and that influence can still be found in the formal law. In addition, the plurality of Nepalese society made it necessary to provide space for different customary regimes to coexist with the formal Hindu law. When it comes to innovations within the legal system, including international law, the different ingredients interact.In family-related matters, the case-law of the Nepali Supreme Court illustrates the confrontation between international legal standards and the traditional rules. The Supreme Court has referred to the culturally conditioned discrimination against women and called for a thorough (political) analysis in order to eliminate discrimination without a radical change of culture. In the area of discrimination against homo- and transsexuals the Supreme Court took a more innovative approach. It remains to be seen, however, if such a change is effective beyond the courtroom.In the area of private financial compensation for wrongs, the formal (written) Nepali law does not have a general concept of tort. Compensation is generally integrated within the ambit of criminal law. Field research indicates that it would be possible to resort to existing customary principles of compensation rather than to the relatively complex common law of torts favoured by some Nepali scholars. However, this approach might not be without difficulty, as it might imply admitting the “superiority” of the customary practices of ethnic groups of lower standing in society.The example of Nepal shows that innovation in a hybrid system is often marked by the difficulty of – at least apparently – contradictory elements and layers of the legal system. There might be a tendency towards choosing the dominant or the most easily accessible solution. This paper suggests that the hybrid nature of the legal system offers opportunities that could be taken in order to achieve effective change and appropriate solutions.

  • HöferAThe Caste Hierarchy and the State in Nepal (Universitätsverlag Wagner Innsbruck 1979).

  • MacDonaldAWLa sorcellerie dans le code népalais de 1853” (1968) L’Homme Revue Française d’Anthropologie6269.

  • KandelDPProperty Rights of Woman in Nepal (Ratna Pustak Bhandar Kathmandu 2001).

  • HellnerJModern Swedish Perspectives” (1974) AJCL116.

  • UrschelerLHMultidimensional Hybridity – Nepali Law from a Comparative Perspective” in Cashin RitaineESycholdM and DonlanSP (eds) Comparative Law and Hybrid Legal Traditions (Schulthess Zurich 2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MalagodiMForging the Nepali Nation through Law: A Reflection on the Use of Western Legal Tools in a Himalayan Kingdom” (2008) Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism433452.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TurinMThis land is my land … (and I’m a woman)Nepali Times2431 August 2001 17.

  • AcharyaMPThe Adversarial v. Inquisitorial Models of Justice” (2003) KSL Journal6370.

  • PradhanangaRBHomicide Law in Nepal: Concept History and Judicial Practice (Ratna Pustak Bhandar Kathmandu 2001).

  • HeustenRFV and BuckleyRASalmond and Heuston on the Law of Torts 21st ed (Sweet and Maxwell London 1996).

  • TimalsenaRK (ed) Some Landmark Decisions of the Supreme Court of Nepal (Supreme Court Kathmandu 2003).

  • DonlanSPComparative Law and Hybrid Legal Traditions – An Introduction” in Cashin RitaineESycholdM and DonlanSP (eds) Comparative Law and Hybrid Legal Traditions (Schulthess Zurich 2010).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MatteiUThree Patterns of Law: Taxonomy and Change in the World’s Legal System” (1997) AJCL544.

  • DonigerW and SmithB KThe Laws of Manu (Penguin Books New Delhi 1991).

  • TwiningWGeneral Jurisprudence: Understanding Law from a Global Perspective (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2009).

  • TwiningWGlobalisation and Legal Theory (Cambridge University Press Cambridge 2000).

  • MenskiWFComparative Law in a Global Context: The Legal Systems of Asia and Africa 2nd ed (CambridgeUniversity Press Cambridge 2006).

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SangroulaYConcepts and Evolution of Human Rights: Nepalese Perspective (Nebula Printers Kathmandu 2005).

  • SangroulaYCriminal Justice System (Kathmanduforthcoming).

  • Amending Some Nepal Acts to Maintain Gender Equality 2063 BS (2006).

  • Caste Based Discrimination and Untouchability (Offence and Punishment) Act2011.

  • Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal 1990.

  • Consumer Protection Act 1998.

  • Eleventh Amendment of the Country Code 2058 BS (2001 published 2002).

  • Human Trafficking and Transportation (Control) Act 2007.

  • Muluki Ain 2020 (1971) (Country Code).

  • State Cases Act 1992.

  • Tort Liability Act 1972.

  • Vehicle and Transport Management Act 1991.

  • MS Meera Kumari Dhungana v HMG Ministry of Law Justice and Parliamentary Affairs Writ No 8392 2050 BS (1993).

  • Writ No 917 of the year 2064 (BS) (2007).

  • Anon (2011) ‘New law threatens to crush Nepal’s gaysThe Times of India 9 June 2011 [date of use 21 Jun 2011].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HavilandC (2006) Parallel Justice, Maoist Style [date of use 20 Jun 2011].

    • Export Citation
  • ÖrücüE (2008) “What is a Mixed Legal System: Exclusion or Expansion? [date of use 22 Jun 2011].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jica (2010) ‘Nepal Office Quarterly Newsletter’ Vol. 57 (April to June 2010) [date of use 20 Jun 2011].

    • Export Citation
  • UrschelerLH (2008) “Taking Statutes SeriouslyKathmandu Law [date of use 21 Jun 2011].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MalagodiM (2010) Constitutional developments in a Himalayan Kingdom: The Experience of Nepal [date of use 10 Jun 2011].

    • Export Citation
  • TöpperwienN (2009) Drawing the Federal Map of [date of use 10 Nov 2011].

    • Export Citation
  • Nepal Law Commission Date Unknown Laws and [date of use 20 Jun 2011].

  • OHCHR Nepal Date Unknown Nepal [date of use 12 Nov 2011].

  • UNDP Nepal Date Unknown Electronic Library [date of use 12 Nov 2011].

  • University of Ottawa World Legal Systems Research Group Date Unknown Introductory Remarks [date of use 21 Jun 2011].

  • PalmerVV (2008) “Two Rival Theories of Mixed Legal [date of use 22 Jun 2011].

  • GhaiY and CottrellJ Date Unknown ‘Roadmap to a New Constitution? [date of use 12 Nov 2011].

    • Export Citation
  • 36)

    Skadestandslagen 1972:207; see for its history Hellner 1974AJCL 1.

Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 98 98 6
Full Text Views 198 198 0
PDF Downloads 3 3 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0