Several billboard ads in Metro Manila have stirred controversy in the past decade for using images suggesting sexual acts or revealing private body parts. Politicians and church leaders have criticised them as being ‘indecent’ or ‘pornographic’. But in spite of this advertising strategy being abandoned, a fresh wave of billboards in Metro Manila has continued to use sexualised images, arguably in innovative ways. A content analysis of some of these billboards suggests that two representational techniques are emergent: purposive and referential. Public criticisms have then been strategically circumvented.
The discourses that have surrounded billboard sexualisation in Metro Manila unravel the moral conservatism of religious institutions and the state. The purposive and referential techniques on billboards are an attempt to navigate such conservatism. Two possibilities are discernible. As the attention is on viewers’ imagination, the referential technique affords space for the cultural critique of these norms. In contrast, the purposive technique is limited as it focuses on the product’s benefit to the customer. This has led to the reinforcement of sexual stereotypes concerning masculinity and femininity, for example. The article ends by reflecting on the state of sexualisation in Metro Manila.
Andrew James Masigan‘Our losing battle against the billboard menace: numbers don’t lie’Manila Bulletin(23 April 2012); available at http://www.mb.com.ph/articles/357763/our-losing-battle-against-the-billboard-menace (accessed 16 October 2012).
Agence France-Presse‘Billboards of scantily-clad rugby players pulled down’Philippine Daily Inquirer(8 July 2011); available at http://lifestyle.inquirer.net/5061/billboards-of-scantily-clad-rugby-players-pulled-down (accessed 15 October 2012).
Rose Garcia‘Ben Chan clarifies disappearance of Dingdong Dantes’s bench billboards’Philippine Entertainment Portal(16 April 2008); available at http://www.pep.ph/news/17123/Ben-Chan-clarifies-disappearance-of-Dingdong-Dantes (accessed 15 October 2012).
Mahar Mangahas‘Rh and freedom to choose’Philippine Daily Inquirer(12 August 2011); available at http://opinion.inquirer.net/9859/rh-and-freedom-to-choose; Anne Raffin and Jayeel Serrano Cornelio ‘The Catholic Church and education as sources of institutional panic in the Philippines’ Asian Journal of Social Science Vol. 37 No. 5 (2009) pp. 778–798.
Kurt Iveson‘Branded cities: outdoor advertising, urban governance, and the outdoor media landscape’AntipodeVol. 44 No. 1 (2012) pp. 151–174; Bernadette de los Reyes and Romeo Santos ‘Billboards: are they here to stay? A study of billboards in Edsa Philippines’ Muhon: A Journal of Architecture Landscape Architecture and the Designed Environment Vol. 3 (2009) pp. 38–43; Gomez ‘The billboardization of Metro Manila’.
Chris HackleyAdvertising and Promotion: Communicating Brands (London: Sage2005); Attwood ‘Reading porn’; Feona Attwood and Clarissa Smith ‘Extreme concern: regulating “dangerous pictures” in the United Kingdom’ Journal of Law and Society Vol. 37 No. 1 (2010) pp. 171–188.