Save

Waiting for Hard Balancing?

Explaining Southeast Asia’s Balancing Behaviour towards China

In: European Journal of East Asian Studies
Authors:
Moch Faisal Karim University of Warwick Bina Nusantara University M.F.Karim@warwick.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Moch Faisal Karim in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Tangguh Chairil Bina Nusantara University Tangguh@binus.ac.id

Search for other papers by Tangguh Chairil in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

The continuity of stable peace in East Asia, especially Southeast Asia, since the end of the Cold War raises one major question: why is there no apparent balancing behaviour against China, the emerging great power in East Asia? In response to this question, exceptionalists argue that there will be no balancing behaviour against China from Southeast Asian states, while soft balancing theorists argue that the balancing behaviour has already occurred in the form of institutional balancing. This article refutes those arguments and maintains that balancing behaviour is not yet apparent in Southeast Asian balancing, yet it exists in an indirect form. In order to make this argument, this article examines the recent military build-up among Southeast Asian states as well as recent assessments of the ineffectiveness of the Southeast Asian regional security framework. The article also further analyses the conditions under which Southeast Asia’s indirect balancing might turn into hard balancing.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 837 139 19
Full Text Views 222 10 1
PDF Views & Downloads 96 21 5