Waiting for Hard Balancing?
Explaining Southeast Asia’s Balancing Behaviour towards China
In: European Journal of East Asian StudiesSearch for other papers by Moch Faisal Karim in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Tangguh Chairil in
Current site
Google Scholar
The continuity of stable peace in East Asia, especially Southeast Asia, since the end of the Cold War raises one major question: why is there no apparent balancing behaviour against China, the emerging great power in East Asia? In response to this question, exceptionalists argue that there will be no balancing behaviour against China from Southeast Asian states, while soft balancing theorists argue that the balancing behaviour has already occurred in the form of institutional balancing. This article refutes those arguments and maintains that balancing behaviour is not yet apparent in Southeast Asian balancing, yet it exists in an indirect form. In order to make this argument, this article examines the recent military build-up among Southeast Asian states as well as recent assessments of the ineffectiveness of the Southeast Asian regional security framework. The article also further analyses the conditions under which Southeast Asia’s indirect balancing might turn into hard balancing.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
1
Kenneth N. Waltz, ‘Structural realism after the Cold War’, International Security, Vol. 25, No. 1 (2000), pp. 5–41.
-
2
Aaron L. Friedberg, ‘Ripe for rivalry: prospects for peace in a multipolar Asia’, International Security, Vol. 18, No. 3 (1993), pp. 5–33.
-
3
John J. Mearsheimer, ‘The future of the American pacifier’, Foreign Affairs—New York, Vol. 80, No. 5 (2001), pp. 46–61.
-
4
John Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W.W. Norton, 2001).
-
5
David C. Kang, ‘Getting Asia wrong: the need for new analytical frameworks’, International Security, Vol. 27, No. 4 (2003), pp. 57–85.
-
7
Kai He, ‘Institutional balancing and international relations theory: economic interdependence and balance of power strategies in Southeast Asia’, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 14, No. 3 (2008), pp. 489–518.
-
8
Evelyn Goh, ‘Great powers and hierarchical order in Southeast Asia: analyzing regional security strategies’, International Security, Vol. 32, No. 3 (2007), pp. 113–157.
-
11
Fareed Zakaria, ‘America’s new balancing act’, Newsweek (6 August 2001), p. 11.
-
15
See Feng Zhang, ‘The rise of Chinese exceptionalism in international relations’, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 19, No. 2 (2013), pp. 305–328.
-
16
David C. Kang, China Rising: Peace, Power, and Order in East Asia (New York: Columbia University Press, 2010), p. 200.
-
18
Christopher Layne, ‘The unipolar illusion revisited: the coming end of the United States’ unipolar moment’, International Security, Vol. 31, No. 2 (2006), pp. 7–41, p. 13.
-
19
Stephen M. Walt, ‘Alliance formation and the balance of world power’, International Security, Vol. 9, No. 4 (1985), pp. 3–43, p. 26.
-
20
Sean Chen and John Feffer, ‘China’s military spending: soft rise or hard threat?’ Asian Perspective, Vol. 33, No. 4 (2009), pp. 47–67.
-
31
He, ‘Institutional balancing and international relations theory’, p. 503.
-
33
Keir A. Lieber and Gerard Alexander, ‘Waiting for balancing: why the world is not pushing back’, International Security, Vol. 30, No. 1 (2005), pp. 109–139, p. 131.
-
38
Prashanth Parameswaran, ‘Cambodia wants China warships: navy commander’, The Diplomat (2016): http://thediplomat.com/2016/02/cambodia-wants-china-warships-navy-commander/.
-
39
Cheunboran Chanborey, ‘Cambodia’s strategic China alignment’, The Diplomat (2015), http://thediplomat.com/2015/07/cambodias-strategic-china-alignment/.
-
45
Timothy Williams, ‘Balancing acts in South-East Asia and President Obama’s trip’, Resurgence of Russia and China Programme (London: Institute of Islamic Strategic and Socio-Political Affairs, 2014).
-
49
Renato Cruz De Castro, ‘Linking spokes together: the Philippines’ gambit of harnessing the United States’ alliances in its external balancing policy against an emergent China’, Pacific Focus, Vol. 29, No. 1 (2014), pp. 140–166.
-
52
Khoo How San, ‘The Five Power Defence Arrangements: if it ain’t broke …’, Pointer: Quarterly Journal of the Singapore Armed Forces, Vol. 26, No. 4 (2000).
-
53
Felix K. Chang, ‘A question of rebalancing: Malaysia’s relations with China’, Foreign Policy Research Institute E-Notes (2014): http://www.fpri.org/article/2014/07/a-question-of-rebalancing-malaysias-relations-with-china/.
-
54
Shang-su Wu, ‘Is Vietnam in denial on military strategy?’ The Diplomat (2014): http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2014/10/30/is-vietnam-in-denial-in-military-strategy/.
-
56
Kuik Cheng-Chwee, ‘The essence of hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s response to a rising China’, Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, Vol. 30, No. 2 (2008), pp. 159–185.
-
57
V. Jackson, ‘Power, trust, and network complexity: three logics of hedging in Asian security’, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 14, No. 3 (2014), pp. 331–356.
-
59
Stephen M. Walt, The Origins of Alliance (New York: Cornell University Press, 1990), p. 18.
-
64
M. Taylor Fravel, ‘Regime insecurity and international cooperation—explaining China’s compromises in territorial disputes’, International Security, Vol. 30, No. 2 (2005), pp. 46–83, p. 76.
-
66
Rommel C. Banlaoi, ‘Southeast Asian perspectives on the rise of China: regional security after 9/11’, Parameters, Vol. 33, No. 2 (2003), pp. 98–107, p. 98; Bruce Vaughn and Wayne M. Morrison, ‘China–Southeast Asia relations: trends, issues, and implications for the United States’, CRS Report for Congress (2006): https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL32688.pdf.
-
70
M. Yahuda, ‘China’s new assertiveness in the South China Sea’, Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 22, No. 81 (2013), pp. 446–447.
-
71
Robert D. Kaplan, ‘The geography of Chinese power’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 89, No. 3 (2010).
-
73
Zachary Keck, ‘China’s building second aircraft carrier’, The Diplomat (10 March 2015).
-
77
Tetsuo Kotani, ‘Lifeline at sea: Japan’s policy toward the Indian Ocean region’, Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, Vol. 7, No. 2 (2011), pp. 220–234.
-
80
Mohd Aminul Karim, ‘The South China Sea disputes: is high politics overtaking?’ Pacific Focus, Vol. 28, No. 1 (2013), pp. 99–119.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1031 | 216 | 24 |
| Full Text Views | 225 | 4 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 105 | 14 | 0 |
Waiting for Hard Balancing?
Explaining Southeast Asia’s Balancing Behaviour towards China
In: European Journal of East Asian StudiesSearch for other papers by Moch Faisal Karim in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Tangguh Chairil in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
The continuity of stable peace in East Asia, especially Southeast Asia, since the end of the Cold War raises one major question: why is there no apparent balancing behaviour against China, the emerging great power in East Asia? In response to this question, exceptionalists argue that there will be no balancing behaviour against China from Southeast Asian states, while soft balancing theorists argue that the balancing behaviour has already occurred in the form of institutional balancing. This article refutes those arguments and maintains that balancing behaviour is not yet apparent in Southeast Asian balancing, yet it exists in an indirect form. In order to make this argument, this article examines the recent military build-up among Southeast Asian states as well as recent assessments of the ineffectiveness of the Southeast Asian regional security framework. The article also further analyses the conditions under which Southeast Asia’s indirect balancing might turn into hard balancing.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1031 | 216 | 24 |
| Full Text Views | 225 | 4 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 105 | 14 | 0 |