The Influence of Rice Agriculture on East Asian Culture and Language
In: European Journal of East Asian StudiesSearch for other papers by Kwang Hyun Ko in
Current site
Google Scholar
Studies have long confirmed the existence of psychological differences between people in the East and those in the West. They have found that East Asians are more interdependent and think in terms of the group; Westerners adopt more individualistic, analytical thinking. Recent studies of rice farming have shown that large-scale agriculture is largely responsible for the collectivist mindset of East Asians. Rice farming alone, however, was not sufficient to mould cooperative, holistic thinking. Rice farming influenced festivals, customs, proverbs and the overall structure of language, all of which would have led Asians to develop an interdependent cultural psychology. This article presents an analytical study that scrutinises Eastern customs and languages, comparing them to those of Western cultures. Generally, the following comparative analysis pertains mostly to widely spoken languages from populated and prospering sectors, such as the Chinese, Korean and Japanese in East Asia, and the English, Spanish and French in Western regions. It is argued that rice farming is correlated not only with festivals, but also with proverbs, particular ways of answering questions, weather-related expressions and overall language structures, including pronouns and articles. This study further posits that a culture of respecting elders may be attributable to rice agriculture.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
2
S.H. Schwartz, Beyond Individualism/Collectivism: New Cultural Dimensions of Values (Thousand Oaks: Sage, 1994).
-
3
C. Chen, S.Y. Lee and H.W. Stevenson, ‘Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students’, Psychological Science, Vol. 6, No. 3 (1995), pp. 170–175.
-
5
M. Gladwell, Outliers: The Story of Success (New York: Little, Brown, 2008), p. 3.
-
6
J. Diamond, Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies (New York: W.W. Norton, 1999).
-
8
A.M. Hayurin, ‘Graying of the global population’, Public Policy and Aging Report, Vol. 17 (2007), pp. 12–17.
-
10
C.J. Yeh and K. Huang, ‘The collectivistic nature of ethnic identity development among Asian-American college students’, Adolescence, Vol. 31, No. 123 (1996), pp. 645–661.
-
11
Y.S. Park and B.S. Kim, ‘Asian and European American cultural values and communication styles among Asian American and European American college students’, Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, Vol. 14, No. 1 (2008), pp. 47–56.
-
14
P. Heggarty and D. Beresford-Jones, ‘Agriculture and language dispersals’, Current Anthropology, Vol. 51, No. 2 (2010), pp. 163–191.
-
17
R.C. Christopher, The Japanese Mind: The Goliath Explained (New York: Linden Press/Simon & Schuster, 1983).
-
18
C.J. Wu, Pinyin Chinese–English Dictionary (Beijing: Commercial Press; Pitman Advanced Publishing Programme, 1979).
-
19
M. Greene, The Technology of Ancient Japan (New York: Rosen Publishing Group, 2006).
-
20
M.H. Manser and R. Fergusson, The Facts on File Dictionary of Proverbs (New York: Facts on File, 2007).
-
21
J.B. Palais, Confucian Statecraft and Korean Institutions: Yu Hyŏngwŏn and the Late Chosŏn Dynasty (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1996).
-
22
S. Yi, Hangul: The Origin of the Korean Alphabet According to New Historical Evidence (Seoul: Tong-mun Kwan, 1957).
-
23
N. Phuong-Mai, C. Terlouw and A. Pilot, ‘Cooperative learning vs Confucian heritage culture’s collectivism: confrontation to reveal some cultural conflicts and mismatch’, Asia Europe Journal, Vol. 3, No. 3 (2005), pp. 403–419.
-
26
J. Diamond, ‘Farmers and their languages: the first expansions’, Science, Vol. 300, No. 5619 (2003), pp. 597–603, doi: 10.1126/science.1078208.
-
27
P.S. Bellwood, First Farmers: The Origins of Agricultural Societies (Malden: Blackwell, 2008).
-
28
A. Feldherr and G. Hardy, The Oxford History of Historical Writing (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010).
-
30
L. Progovac, Negative and Positive Polarity: A Binding Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).
-
32
P.S. Bellwood and C. Renfrew, Examining the Farming/Language Dispersal Hypothesis (Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge, 2002).
-
33
T. Kleeman and T. Barrett, The Ancient Chinese World (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).
-
35
C. Pak and K. Pak, Korean: An Intensive Course (Seoul, Korea: Yonsei University Press, 1975).
-
36
W.H. Baxter and L. Sagart, Old Chinese: A New Reconstruction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).
-
37
C.N. Li and S.A. Thompson, ‘Subject and topic: a new typology of language’, Contemporary Linguistics, Vol. 2, No. 004 (1984).
-
38
F. Bray, The Rice Economies: Technology and Development in Asian Societies (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986).
-
39
C. Stepanchuk and C.C. Wong, Mooncakes and Hungry Ghosts: Festivals of China (San Francisco: China Books and Periodicals, 1991).
-
43
R. Cowan, The Teacher’s Grammar of English: A Course Book and Reference Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).
-
44
L. Wei, Chinese Festivals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).
-
46
R.D. Arkush, ‘ “If man works hard the land will not be lazy”: entrepreneurial values in north Chinese peasant proverbs’, Modern China, Vol. 10, No. 4 (1984), pp. 461–479.
-
47
E.D. Hirsch, J.F. Kett and J. Trefil, The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2002).
-
48
H.J. Nesbitt (ed.), Rice Production in Cambodia (Manila, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute, 1997).
-
49
Eurostat, European Statistical Yearbook 2007 (Luxemburg: European Commission, 2007).
-
51
R.O. Whyte, The Asian Village as a Basis for Rural Modernization (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1976).
-
53
K.T. Sung, ‘Elder respect: exploration of ideals and forms in East Asia’, Journal of Aging Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1 (2001), pp. 13–26.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2516 | 283 | 15 |
| Full Text Views | 322 | 2 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 148 | 5 | 0 |
The Influence of Rice Agriculture on East Asian Culture and Language
In: European Journal of East Asian StudiesSearch for other papers by Kwang Hyun Ko in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Studies have long confirmed the existence of psychological differences between people in the East and those in the West. They have found that East Asians are more interdependent and think in terms of the group; Westerners adopt more individualistic, analytical thinking. Recent studies of rice farming have shown that large-scale agriculture is largely responsible for the collectivist mindset of East Asians. Rice farming alone, however, was not sufficient to mould cooperative, holistic thinking. Rice farming influenced festivals, customs, proverbs and the overall structure of language, all of which would have led Asians to develop an interdependent cultural psychology. This article presents an analytical study that scrutinises Eastern customs and languages, comparing them to those of Western cultures. Generally, the following comparative analysis pertains mostly to widely spoken languages from populated and prospering sectors, such as the Chinese, Korean and Japanese in East Asia, and the English, Spanish and French in Western regions. It is argued that rice farming is correlated not only with festivals, but also with proverbs, particular ways of answering questions, weather-related expressions and overall language structures, including pronouns and articles. This study further posits that a culture of respecting elders may be attributable to rice agriculture.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 2516 | 283 | 15 |
| Full Text Views | 322 | 2 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 148 | 5 | 0 |
