The Role of Familiarity in the Destination Image

A Case Study of South Korea

in European Journal of East Asian Studies
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

The present study aims to explain more deeply the theory of destination image and its process of formation in culturally distant countries, specifically regarding familiarity as a factor of influence. To achieve this aim, a questionnaire was administered to 307 South Korean citizens in order to examine Koreans’ image of Spain as a tourist destination, and the level of familiarity with the destination. The findings reveal that familiarity has a moderating effect on the destination image, and the main information source that most contributes to a positive image is provided by ‘relatives, friends, and/or acquaintances’. This paper contributes to the literature by showing the importance of familiarity on image formation and has significant management implications in the context of helping to create an appropriate image of a tourist destination.

The Role of Familiarity in the Destination Image

A Case Study of South Korea

in European Journal of East Asian Studies

Sections

References

14

Baloglu and McCleary‘A model of destination image formation’; Kim, H., and S.L. Richardson. ‘Motion picture impacts on destination images’. Annals of Tourism Research 30 (1) (2003): 216–237; Pike S. and C. Ryan. ‘Destination positioning analysis through a comparison of cognitive affective and conative perceptions’. Journal of Travel Research 42 (4) (2004): 333–342; Beerli and Martín ‘Factors influencing destination image’; Beerli and Martín ‘Tourists’ characteristics’; Bigné et al. ‘Tourism image’; San Martín and Del Bosque ‘Exploring the cognitive–affective nature of destination image’.

20

Baloglu‘Image variations of Turkey by familiarity index’; Kim and Richardson, ‘Motion picture impacts’; Prentice, R. ‘Tourist familiarity and imagery’. Annals of Tourism Research 31 (4) (2004): 923–945; Lee S. D. Scott and H. Kim. ‘Celebrity fan involvement and destination perceptions’. Annals of Tourism Research 35 (3) (2008): 809–832.

25

Beerli and Martín‘Factors influencing destination image’677–678.

36

Echtner and Ritchie‘The meaning and measurement of destination image’; Echtner, C.M., and J.B. Ritchie. ‘The measurement of destination image: an empirical assessment’. Journal of Travel Research 31 (4) (1993): 3–13.

Figures

  • View in gallery
    Figure 1

    Attributes used to measure cognitive and affective components of the destination image

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 11 11 10
Full Text Views 10 10 10
PDF Downloads 1 1 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0