Keeping Up Appearances
State Sovereignty and the Protection of Refugees in Southeast Asia
In: European Journal of East Asian StudiesAbstract
The fact that most Southeast Asian States are not party to the main instruments pertaining to the protection of refugees has given rise to the ‘rejection of international refugee law’ theory, which has largely dominated the literature on the issues pertaining to refugees in Southeast Asia. Based on an analysis of the practices of Southeast Asian States with regard to refugees, this article argues that although they are not party to the 1951 Convention, the main countries of asylum in the region, i.e. Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia, de facto treat differently the people they acknowledge to be in need of some sort of protection: that is, refugees. Unlike other irregular migrants, refugees are protected against non-refoulement and, to a certain extent, are also protected from detention for irregular entry into the territory of another State. In doing so, Southeast Asian States maintain a ‘fiction’ according to which they preserve sovereignty over the borders of their countries while in reality largely accepting the limitations posed by international refugee law.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Amnesty International. Thailand: Between a Rock and a Hard Place. 28 September 2017, available at www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa39/7031/2017/en/.
-
Aleinikoff, Alexander T. ‘International Legal Norms on Migration: Substance without Architecture’, in International Migration Law—Developing Paradigms and Key Challenges, eds Ryszard Cholewinski, Richard Perruchoud, and Euan MacDonald (The Hague: TMC Asser Press, 2007), 467–479.
-
Baek, Buhm Suk, and Gauri Subramanium. ‘Myanmarese Refugees in Thailand: The Need for Effective Protection’, Cornell Law Student Papers (2008), available at https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/dsp_papers/1/.
-
Chang-Muy, Fernando. ‘International Refugee Law in Asia’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 24 (1992): 1171–1180.
-
Chetail, Vincent. ‘Sources of International Migration Law’, in Foundations of International Migration Law, eds Brian Opeskin, Richard Perruchoud and Jillyanne Redpath-Cross (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012), 59–91.
-
Chetail, Vincent. ‘Are Refugee Rights Human Rights? Some Unorthodox Questioning on the Relations between International Refugee Law and International Human Rights Law’, in Human Rights and Immigration, ed. Marin Rubio (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 19–72.
-
Cheung, Samuel. ‘Migration Control and the Solutions Impasse in South and Southeast Asia: Implications from the Rohingya Experience’, Journal of Refugee Studies 25, 1 (2011): 50–70.
-
Chusri, Dares, Tarina Rubin, Ma. Esmeralda Silva, Jason D. Theede, Sunanta Wongchalee and Patcharin Chansawang. ‘The Dynamics, Needs and Constraints of Stakeholders’, in Humanitarian Assistance for Displaced Persons from Myanmar, eds Premjai Vungsiriphisal, Dares Chusri and Supang Chantavanich (Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014), 145–156.
-
Clark, Tom, and François Crépeau. ‘Mainstreaming Refugee Rights. The 1951 Refugee Convention and International Human Rights Law’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 17, 4 (1999): 389–410.
-
Coles, Gervase. ‘Temporary Refugee and the Large Scale Influx of Refugees’, The Australian Year Book of International Law 8 (1983): 189–212.
-
Davies, Sara E. ‘The Asian Rejection? International Refugee Law in Asia’, Australian Journal of Politics and History 52, 4 (2006): 562–575.
-
Davies, Sara E. Legitimizing Rejection: International Refugee Law in South East Asia (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2008).
-
Durieux, Jean-François, and Jane McAdam. ‘Non-Refoulement through Time: The Case for a Derogation Clause to the Refugee Convention in Mass Influx Emergencies’, International Journal of Refugee Law 16, 1 (2004): 4–24.
-
Eldridge, Philippe. The Politics of Human Rights in Southeast Asia (London: Routledge, 2002).
-
Frelick, Bill, and Barbara Kohnen. ‘Filling the Gap: Temporary Protected Status’, Journal of Refugee Studies 8, 4 (1995): 339–363.
-
Goodwin-Gill, Guy. ‘Non-Refoulement and the New Asylum Seekers’, Virginia Journal of International Law 26 (1986): 897–918.
-
Hathaway, James C. The Rights of Refugees Under International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005).
-
Human Rights Watch. Unwanted and Unprotected: Burmese Refugees in Thailand (1998), available at www.hrw.org/legacy/reports98/thai/.
-
Human Rights Watch. Perilous Plight. Burma’s Rohingya Take to the Seas (2009), available at www.hrw.org/report/2009/05/26/perilous-plight/burmas-rohingya-take-seas.
-
Human Rights Watch. Ad Hoc and Inadequate—Thailand’s Treatment of Refugees and Asylum Seekers (2012), available at www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/thailand0912.pdf.
-
Hunt, Taya, and Nikola Errington. ‘The Search for Protection in Southeast Asia’, in Protection of Refugees and Displaced Persons in the Asia-Pacific Region, eds Francis Angus and Rowena Maguire (London: Routledge, 2013).
-
Hyndman, Patricia. ‘Asylum and Non-refoulement—Are These Obligations Owed to Refugees under International Law?’, Philippine Law Journal 57 (1982): 43–77.
-
Kälin, Walter, Martina Caroni and Lukas Heim. ‘Article 33, para.1 (Prohibition of Expulsion or Return (“Refoulement”/Défense d’expulsion et de refoulement)’, in The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol. A Commentary, ed. Andreas Zimmermann (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 1327–1395.
-
Kneebone, Susan. ‘The Bali Process and Global Refugee Policy in the Asia-Pacific Region’, Journal of Refugee Studies 27, 4 (2014): 1–23.
-
Lang, Hazel J. Fear and Sanctuary. Burmese Refugees in Thailand (Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press, 2002).
-
Lauterpacht, Elihu, and Daniel Bethlehem. ‘The Scope and Content of the Principle of Non-Refoulement: Opinion’, in Refugee Protection in International Law: UNHCR’s Global Consultations on International Protection, eds Erika Feller, Volker Türk and Frances Nicholson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 87–177.
-
Low, Choo Chin. ‘A Strategy of Attrition through Enforcement: The Unmaking of Irregular Migration in Malaysia’, Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 36, 2 (2017): 101–136.
-
McConnahie, Kirsten. ‘Forced Migration in South-East Asia and East Asia’, in The Oxford Handbook of Refugee and Forced Migration Studies, eds Elena Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, Gil Loescher, Katy Long and Nando Sigona (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 1–10.
-
Mathew, Penelope, and Tristan Harley, Refugee Protection and Regional Cooperation in Southeast Asia. A Fieldwork Report (Canberra: Australian National University, 2014).
-
Moretti, Sebastien. ‘The Challenge of Durable Solutions for Refugees at the Thai–Myanmar Border’, Refugee Survey Quarterly 34, 3 (2015): 70–94.
-
Moretti, Sebastien. La protection internationale des réfugiés en Asie du sud-est: du privilège aux droits (Brussels: Bruylant, 2016).
-
Moretti, Sebastien. ‘UNHCR and the Migration Regime Complex in Asia-Pacific. Between Responsibility Shifting and Responsibility Sharing’, New Issues in Refugee Research 283 (2016).
-
Moretti, Sebastien. ‘Protection in the Context of Mixed Migratory Movements by Sea: The Case of the Bay of Bengal and Andaman Sea Crisis’, International Journal of Human Rights 22, 2 (2017): 237–261.
-
Muntarbhorn, Vitit. The Status of Refugees in Asia (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992).
-
Muntarbhorn, Vitit. ‘Refugee Law and Practice in the Asia and Pacific Region: Thailand as a Case Study’, Research Paper (Thailand: UNHCR, 2004).
-
Noll, Gregor. ‘Article 31 (Refugees Unlawfully in the Country of Refuge/Réfugiés en Situation Irrégulière dans le Pays d’Accueil)’, in The 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 Protocol. A Commentary, ed. Andreas Zimmermann (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 1243–1276.
-
Perluss, Deborah, and Joan F. Hartman. ‘Temporary Refuge: Emergence of a Customary Norm’, Virginia Journal of International Law 26, 3 (1986): 551–626.
-
Petcharamesree, Sriprapha. ‘ASEAN and Its Approach to Forced Migration Issues’, The International Journal of Human Rights 20, 2 (2014): 173–190.
-
Shearer, Ivan. ‘International Law and Refugees in South-east Asia’, Thesaurus Acroasium 13 (1987): 431–468.
-
Songprasert, Phuwadol, and Noppawan Chongwatana. Thailand: A First Asylum Country for Indochinese Refugees (Bangkok: Institute of Asian Studies, Chulalongkorn University, 1988).
-
Thom, Graham. ‘The May 2015 Boat Crisis: The Rohingya in Aceh’, Cosmopolitan Civil Societies Journal 8, 2 (2016): 43–62.
-
Towle, Richard. ‘Processes and Critiques of the Indo-Chinese Comprehensive Plan of Action: An Instrument of International Burden-Sharing?’, International Journal of Refugee Law 18, 3–4 (2006): 537–570.
-
Tsamenyi, Martin B. ‘The “Boat People”: Are They Refugees?’, Human Rights Quarterly 5, 3: 348–373.
-
UNGA. Declaration and Comprehensive Plan of Action of the International Conference on Indo-Chinese Refugees, Report of the Secretary-General (Geneva: UNHCR, 1989).
-
UNHCR. Note on the Principle of Non-Refoulement (Geneva: UNHCR, 1997).
-
UNHCR. Analysis of Gaps in Refugee Protection Capacity—Thailand (Geneva: UNHCR, 2006).
-
UNHCR. Advisory Opinion on the Extraterritorial Application of Non-Refoulement Obligations under the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and the 1967 Protocol (Geneva: UNHCR, 2007).
-
UNHCR. UNHCR Policy on Refugee Protection and Solutions in Urban Areas (Geneva: UNHCR, 2009).
-
UNHCR. But When Will Our Turn Come? A Review of the Implementation of UNHCR’s Urban Refugee Policy in Malaysia (Geneva: UNHCR, 2012).
-
UNHCR. Note on the Mandate of the High Commissioner for Refugees and his Office (Geneva: UNHCR, 2013).
-
Wanandi, Jusuf. ‘Conflict and Cooperation in the Asia-Pacific Region: An Indonesian Perspective’, Asian Survey 22, 6 (1982): 503–515.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 424 | 64 | 1 |
| Full Text Views | 506 | 14 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 356 | 20 | 0 |
Keeping Up Appearances
State Sovereignty and the Protection of Refugees in Southeast Asia
In: European Journal of East Asian StudiesAbstract
The fact that most Southeast Asian States are not party to the main instruments pertaining to the protection of refugees has given rise to the ‘rejection of international refugee law’ theory, which has largely dominated the literature on the issues pertaining to refugees in Southeast Asia. Based on an analysis of the practices of Southeast Asian States with regard to refugees, this article argues that although they are not party to the 1951 Convention, the main countries of asylum in the region, i.e. Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia, de facto treat differently the people they acknowledge to be in need of some sort of protection: that is, refugees. Unlike other irregular migrants, refugees are protected against non-refoulement and, to a certain extent, are also protected from detention for irregular entry into the territory of another State. In doing so, Southeast Asian States maintain a ‘fiction’ according to which they preserve sovereignty over the borders of their countries while in reality largely accepting the limitations posed by international refugee law.
| All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 424 | 64 | 1 |
| Full Text Views | 506 | 14 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 356 | 20 | 0 |