Mobility Norms in Free Trade Agreements

Migration Governance in Asia between Regional Integration and Free Trade

in European Journal of East Asian Studies
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?

Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.

Help

 

Have Institutional Access?

Login with your institution. Any other coaching guidance?

Connect

Abstract

Notwithstanding their traditional attachment to sovereignty, Southeast and East Asian countries have embraced a dynamic agenda of labour mobility liberalisation through trade agreements. This article assesses the free movement agenda within ASEAN from a multi-level perspective, comparing it to ASEAN countries’ corresponding commitments within the World Trade Organisation’s General Agreement on Trade in Services and Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) concluded as a group or individually with non-ASEAN countries. Contrary to other trade aspects it turns out that intra-regional commitments within ASEAN do not significantly exceed multilateral ones, and score below the level of liberalisation achieved in ASEAN+ and bilateral FTAs. This article interprets this discrepancy as a consequence of strong economic and labour market differences among ASEAN members as well as the lower sensitivity of allegedly technocratic FTAs for considerations of national sovereignty. The article concludes with the limits of this trade policy approach for migration governance and migrants’ rights.

Sections
References
  • Acharya Amitav. ‘The future of ASEAN: obsolescent or resilient?’ In ASEAN Matters: Reflecting on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations ed. Yoong Yoong Lee (Singapore: World Scientific Publishing 2011).

  • ASEANASEAN Integration in Services (2009) www.asean.org/storage/2015/12/ASEAN-Integration-in-Services-(Dec%202015).pdf.

  • Asian Development Bank (ADB). The Long Road Ahead: Status Report on the Implementation of the ASEAN Mutual Recognition Arrangements on Professional Services (Mandaluyong City Philippines: Asian Development Bank 2017).

  • Beeson Mark. ‘ASEAN plus 3 and the rise of reactionary regionalism’. Contemporary Southeast Asia 23 2 (2003): 251–268.

  • Capannelli G. ‘Key issues on labour mobility in ASEAN’. Paper prepared for the 3rd Roundtable on Labour Migration in Asia ADBI 2013.

  • Cerna L. ‘The varieties of high-skilled immigration policies: coalitions and policy outputs in advanced industrial countries’. Journal of European Public Policy 16 1 (2009): 144–161.

  • Cremona Marise David Kleiman Joris Larik Rena Lee and Pascal Venesson. ASEAN’s External Agreements. Law Practice and the Quest for Collective Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2015).

  • Dawson Laura R. ‘Labour mobility and the WTO: the limits of GATS mode 4’ International Migration 51 1 (2013): 1–23.

  • Fröbel Folker Jürgen Heinrichts and Otto Kreye. Die neue internationale Arbeitsteilung: strukturelle Arbeitslosigkeit in den Industrieländern und die Industriealisierung der Entwicklungsländer [The new international division of labour: structural unemployment in industrialized countries and the industrialization of developing countries] (Reinbek: Rowohlt 1977).

  • Huelser S. and A. Heal. Moving Freely? Labour Mobility in ASEAN ARTNet Policy Brief (Bangkok: UN ESCAP 2014).

  • International Labour Organisation (ILO) and ADBASEAN Community 2015: Managing Integration for Better Jobs and Shared Prosperity (Bangkok: ILO and ADB 2014) xii www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/42818/asean-community-2015-managing-integration.pdf.

  • International Organisation for Migration (IOM) World Migration: Managing Labour Mobility in the Evolving Global EconomyIOM World Migration Report Series (2008) https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/wmr_1.pdf.

  • Jetschke Anja and Saori N. Katada. ‘Asia’. In The Oxford Handbook of Regional Integration eds Tanja Börzel and Thomas Risse (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2015).

  • Jones Lee. ‘Explaining the failure of the ASEAN economic community: the primacy of domestic political economy’. Pacific Review 29 5 (2016): 647–670.

  • Jurje Flavia. ‘The role of corporations in a multi-layered migration governance system: regulating the admission of labour’. Paper presented at the International Conference Multilayered Governance: Gains for International Migration? 27–28 April 2016 Bern (under review).

  • Lahav G. and S. Lavenex. ‘International migration’. In The Handbook of International Relations eds W. Carlsnaes T. Risse and B. Simmons (London: Sage 2012).

  • Lavenex Sandra and Flavia Jurje. ‘The migration–trade nexus: migration provisions in trade agreements’. In The Handbook of International Political Economy of Migration eds Leila Talani and Simon McMahon (London: Edward Elgar 2015).

  • Lavenex Sandra and Flavia Jurje. ‘EU/US migration policy towards emerging countries: regulatory power reversed?’ European Foreign Affairs Review 22 (2017): 157–176.

  • Lavenex Sandra Flavia Jurje Terri Givens and Ross Buchanan. ‘Regional migration governance’. In The Oxford Handbook of Regional Integration eds Tanja Börzel and Thomas Risse (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2016).

  • Manning Chris and Pradip Bhatnagar. Liberalizing and Facilitating the Movement of Individual Service Providers under AFAS: Implications for Labour and Immigration Policies and Procedures in ASEANREPSF Project 02/004 final report (2004) http://aadcp2.org/file/02-004-FinalMainReportOnly_ApendixNotIncluded.pdf.

  • Martin David A. ‘Effects of international law on migration policy and practice: the uses of hypocrisy’. International Migration Review 23 3 (1989): 547–578.

  • Massey Douglas S. ‘International migration at the dawn of the twenty-first century: the role of the state’. Population and Development Review 25 2 (1999): 303–322.

  • Nikomborirak D. and S. Jitdumrong. ‘ASEAN trade in services’. In ASEAN Economic Community. A Work in Progress eds Sanchita Basu Das Jayant Menon Rodolfo C. Severino and Omkar Lal Shrestha (Singapore: ADB & Institute of Southeast Asian Studies 2013).

  • Orbeta A. Jr. Enhancing Labor Mobility in ASEAN: Focus on Lower-skilled Workers Discussion Paper 2013–2017 (Manila: Philippine Institute for Development Studies 2013).

  • Ravenhill John. ‘East Asian regionalism: much ado about nothing?’ Review of International Studies 35 Supplement S1 (2009): 215–235.

  • Sapir André. ‘The General Agreement on Trade in Services. From 1994 to the year 2000’. Journal of World Trade 33 1 (1999): 51–66.

  • Shachar A. ‘The race for talent: highly skilled migrants and competitive immigration regimes’. NYUL Review 81 1 (2006): 148–206.

  • Tuccio Michele. ‘Determinants of intra-ASEAN migration’. Asian Development Review 34 1 (2017): 144–166.

  • UN ESCAP. Regional Integration and Labour Mobility. Linking Trade Migration and Development (2014) http://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/publications/STESCAP2688_No81.pdf.

  • UNDESA/OECD. World Migration in Figures. Contribution to UN High Level Dialogue on Migration and Development 3–4 October 2013.

  • WTO. Council for Trade in Services Presence of Natural Persons (Mode 4) Background Note by the Secretariat S/C/W/75of8.12.1998 1998.

  • ASEAN–Australia–New Zealand (2009)

  • ASEAN–China (Chapter on services added in 2007)

  • ASEAN–India (Chapter on services added in 2014)

  • ASEAN–Japan (2008)

  • ASEAN–Republic of Korea (Chapter on services added in 2007)

  • Malaysia–Pakistan (2008)

  • Malaysia–Japan (2006)

  • Malaysia–New Zealand (2009)

  • Malaysia–Australia (2012)

  • Malaysia–India (2011)

  • Singapore–Gulf Cooperation Council (2013)

  • Singapore–Costa Rica (2013)

  • Singapore–Peru (2009)

  • Singapore–Panama (2006)

  • Singapore–Jordan (2013)

  • Singapore–US (2005)

  • Singapore–Australia (2003)

  • Singapore–New Zealand (2000)

  • Singapore–South Korea (2006)

  • Singapore–Japan (2007)

  • Singapore–India (2005)

  • Singapore–China (2008)

  • Thailand–Chile (2015)

  • Thailand–Australia (2005)

  • Thailand–Japan (2009)

  • Vietnam–Japan (2008)

  • Vietnam–South Korea (2015)

  • India–Singapore (2005)

  • India–Malaysia (2011)

  • India–Japan (2011)

  • India–South Korea (2010)

  • China–Singapore (2008)

  • China–Peru (2010)

  • China–New Zealand (2008)

  • China–Pakistan (2009)

  • China–Chile (2006)

  • China–Hong Kong (2004)

  • China–Macau (2004)

  • China–Costa Rica (2011)

  • China–Switzerland (2013)

  • China–Australia (2015)

  • China–South Korea (2014)

  • China–Iceland (2013)

  • China–ASEAN (2007)

  • Japan–Australia (2015)

  • Japan–Brunei (2008)

  • Japan–Chile (2007)

  • Japan–India (2011)

  • Japan–Indonesia (2007)

  • Japan–Malaysia (2006)

  • Japan–Mexico (2005)

  • Japan–Mongolia (2016)

  • Japan–Peru (2012)

  • Japan–Philippines (2008)

  • Japan–Singapore (2001)

  • Japan–Switzerland (2008)

  • Japan–Thailand (2007)

  • Japan–Vietnam (2009)

  • South Korea–Australia (2014)

  • South Korea–India (2010)

  • South Korea–New Zealand (2012)

  • South Korea–China (2015)

  • South Korea–Canada (2015)

  • South Korea–Chile (2004)

  • South Korea–Colombia (2016)

  • South Korea–EU (2010)

  • South Korea–EFTA (2006)

  • South Korea–Peru (2011)

  • South Korea–Singapore (2006)

  • South Korea–Turkey (2013)

  • South Korea–US (2007)

  • South Korea–Vietnam (2015)

Figures
  • View in gallery
    Figure 1

    Mobility-related provisions in ASEAN+ and individual ASEAN states’ bilateral free trade agreements (authors’ calculations based on coded primary data). See Annex for the list of all agreements coded

  • View in gallery
    Figure 2

    Mobility-related provisions in Asian FTAs: India, China, Japan, South Korea (authors’ calculations based on coded primary data). See Annex for the list of all agreements coded

Index Card
Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 191 186 21
Full Text Views 174 174 0
PDF Downloads 25 25 0
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0