Corporatist Institutions and Militant Actions
Building an Industrial Relations System in Myanmar
In: European Journal of East Asian StudiesSearch for other papers by Jinyoung Park in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Drawing on data from archives and fieldwork in Myanmar, a country in political change from a five-decade authoritarian regime to a quasi-civilian one, this study explores the reasons for a prevalence of corporatist aspects at the early stage of reforms. The early introduction of corporatism in Myanmar diverges from other Asian countries that experienced transitions accompanied by labour militancy, and only later embraced corporatism when political power shifted to elected pro-labour parties. This article argues, first, that corporatism prevails in the rhetoric of the labour movement and in Myanmar’s industrial relations institutions, while labour militancy has simultaneously increased; second, corporatism in Myanmar has few historical precedents but has recently been promoted primarily by the International Labour Organisation (ILO); and third, while corporatism has failed to bring about industrial peace, the rhetoric and institutions of corporatism may limit the political potential of Myanmar’s labour movement by restricting unions’ activities to economic concerns.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Aleman, Jose A. Labor Relations in New Democracies: East Asia, Latin America, and Europe (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).
-
Arnold, Dennis, and Stephen Campbell. ‘Labour regime transformation in Myanmar: constitutive processes of contestation’. Development and Change 48, 4 (2017), 801–824.
-
Aye Min Soe. ‘Workers’ right boost—tripartite talks result in agreement on amending labour laws’. The Global New Light of Myanmar, 28 September 2015; available at http://www.globalnewlightofmyanmar.com/workers-rights-boost-tripartite-talks-result-in-agreement-on-amending-labour-laws/.
-
Ba Kaung. ‘4,000 workers go on strike in Rangoon’. The Irrawaddy, 6 March 2010; available at http://www2.irrawaddy.com/article.php?art_id=17972 (accessed 16 March 2017).
-
Badgley, John. ‘The Burmese way to capitalism’. Southeast Asian Affairs (1990), 229–239.
-
Campbell, Stephen. ‘On labour organisations in Myanmar’. Global Labour Column 144 (2013); available at http://column.global-labour-university.org/2013/07/on-labour-organisations-in-myanmar.html.
-
Chen, Dene-hern. ‘Burma’s industrial relations at a crossroads’. Democratic Voice of Burma (2014); available at http://www.dvb.no/news/burmas-industrial-relations-at-a-crossroads-burma-myanmar/43596.
-
Chu, Jou-juo. ‘Labor militancy and Taiwan’s export-led industrialization. Labor and democratization in South Korea and Taiwan’. Journal of Contemporary Asia 33, 1 (2003), 18–36.
-
Gillan, Michael, and Thein Htwe. ‘Employment relations, the state and transitions in governance in Myanmar’. Journal of Industrial Relations (2016), 1–16.
-
Henry, Nicholas. ‘Trade union internationalism and political change in Myanmar’. Global Change, Peace & Security, 27, 1 (2015), 69–84.
-
Henry, Nicholas. ‘Everyday agents of change: trade unions in Myanmar’. In The Everyday Political Economy of Southeast Asia, eds Juanita Elias and Lena Rethel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016), 72–92.
-
HKTDC Research. Myanmar Rising: Opportunities in Asia’s Final Production Frontier (Hong Kong: HKTDC, 2016); available at http://economists-pick-research.hktdc.com/business-news/article/Research-Articles/Myanmar-Rising-Opportunities-in-Asia-s-Final-Production-Frontier/rp/en/1/1X000000/ 1X0A6C1Z.htm.
-
Ho, Ming-sho. ‘The dialectic of institutional and extra-institutional tactics: explaining the trajectory of Taiwan’s labor movement,’ Development and Society 44, 2 (2015), 247–273.
-
Horsey, Richard. Ending Forced Labour in Myanmar: Engaging a Pariah Regime (New York: Routledge, 2011).
-
Human Rights Documentation Unit. ‘Burma Human Rights Year Book 2005’, unpublished report (Mae Sot: Human Rights Documentation Unit of National Coalition Government of the Union of Burma, 2006); available at http://www.burmalibrary.org/docs5/HRDU-archive/Burma%20Human%20Righ/former/YB2005.pdf.
-
ILO. ‘Executive summary report on Myanmar labour force, child labour and school to work transition survey 2015’ (2016); available at http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---ilo-yangon/documents/publication/wcms_516117.pdf.
-
Jones, Lee. ‘The political economy of Myanmar’s transition’. Journal of Contemporary Asia 44, 1 (2016), 144–170.
-
Kamimura, Yasuhiro. ‘Big deal and small deal: the new corporatism in South Korea and Taiwan’. Presentation paper, fifth EASP conference at the National Taiwan University, 4 November 2008.
-
Kyaw Soe Lwin. The Evolution of Labour Politics in Post-Colonial Myanmar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation (City University of Hong Kong, 2013).
-
Kyaw Yin Hlaing. The Politics of State–Business Relations in Post-Colonial Burma. Unpublished doctoral dissertation (Cornell University, 2001).
-
Kyaw Yin Hlaing. ‘The politics of state–society relations in Burma’. South East Asia Research 15, 2 (2007), 213–254.
-
Lee, Joseph S. ‘Political and workplace democracy in Taiwan’. In ‘Industrial Relations and Democracy in Asia. IRRA 56th Annual Proceeding Report’, unpublished (2015).
-
Lee, Yoonkyung. Militant or Partisans: Labor Unions and Democratic Politics in Korea and Taiwan (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011).
-
MGMA and MTUF. Joint statement, 10 November 2014; available at http://www.myanmargarments.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Joint-Statement-of- and MGMA-MTUF-English-Version-24.11.2014.pdf.
-
Mya Maung. ‘The Burmese approach to development: economic growth without democracy’. Journal of Asian Economics 7, 1 (1995), 97–129.
-
Noe Noe Aung. ‘Activists defend role in strikes’. Myanmar Times 32, 633 (2 July 2012); available at http://www.mmtimes.com/2012/news/633/news63321.html.
-
Noe Noe Aung and Myat May Zin. ‘Eighteen strikes Yangon in May: activist’. Myanmar Times, 28 May 2012; available at http://www.mmtimes.com/index.php/national-news/yangon/658-eighteen-strikes-yangon-in-may-activist.html.
-
Progressive Voice. ‘Rising the bottom: a report on the garment industry in Myanmar’. Unpublished report (2015).
-
Schmitter, Philippe C. ‘Still the century of corporatism?’ In Trends Towards Corporatist Intermediation, eds Philippe C. Schmitter and Gerhard Lehmbruch (London: Sage, 1979), 7–52.
-
Shwe Yee Saw Myint and Yimou Lee. ‘H&M factory in Myanmar damaged in violent labor dispute’. Reuters, 7 March 2017; available at http://www.reuters.com/article/us-myanmar-factory-idUSKBN16E1TC.
-
Taylor, Robert H. The State in Myanmar (Honolulu: University of Hawai‘i Press, 2009).
-
Than Win. ‘The new legal framework: labour organization law, industrial dispute settlement and collective bargaining’. Presentation paper (2012); available at http://www.mol.gov.mm/mm/wpcontent/plugins/download-monitor/download.php?id=53.
-
Tin Maung Maung Than. State Dominance in Myanmar: The Political Economy of Industrialization (Singapore: ISEAS Publishing, 2007).
-
Wilson, Ross. ‘The new union movement in Myanmar’. Global Labour Column (2013); available at http://column.global-labour-university.org/2013/09/the-new-union-movement-in-myanmar.html.
-
Yan Gyi Aung. ‘Sanctions’. The New Light of Myanmar, 15 February 2011; available at http://www.myanmar-embassy-tokyo.net/news/2011-02-15-article.pdf.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 484 | 76 | 20 |
| Full Text Views | 180 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 134 | 2 | 0 |
Corporatist Institutions and Militant Actions
Building an Industrial Relations System in Myanmar
In: European Journal of East Asian StudiesSearch for other papers by Jinyoung Park in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Drawing on data from archives and fieldwork in Myanmar, a country in political change from a five-decade authoritarian regime to a quasi-civilian one, this study explores the reasons for a prevalence of corporatist aspects at the early stage of reforms. The early introduction of corporatism in Myanmar diverges from other Asian countries that experienced transitions accompanied by labour militancy, and only later embraced corporatism when political power shifted to elected pro-labour parties. This article argues, first, that corporatism prevails in the rhetoric of the labour movement and in Myanmar’s industrial relations institutions, while labour militancy has simultaneously increased; second, corporatism in Myanmar has few historical precedents but has recently been promoted primarily by the International Labour Organisation (ILO); and third, while corporatism has failed to bring about industrial peace, the rhetoric and institutions of corporatism may limit the political potential of Myanmar’s labour movement by restricting unions’ activities to economic concerns.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 484 | 76 | 20 |
| Full Text Views | 180 | 0 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 134 | 2 | 0 |