The Precautionary Principle: Is it Safe

in European Journal of Health Law
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

The precautionary principle is generally acknowledged to be a powerful tool for protecting health but it was originally invoked by policy makers for dealing with environmental issues. In the 1990s, the principle was incorporated into many legislative and regulatory texts in international law. One can consider that the precautionary principle has turned into “precautionism” necessary to prove to the people, taking account of risk in decisions. There is now a risk that these abuses will deprive the principle of its meaning and value. When pushed to its limits, the precautionary principle can even be dangerous when applied to the healthcare field. This is why a critical analysis of the principle is necessary. Through the literature, it sometimes seems to deviate somehow from the essence of the precautionary principle as it is commonly used in relation to health. We believe that educational work is necessary to familiarize professionals, policy makers and public opinion of the precautionary principle and avoid confusion. We propose a critical analysis of the use and misuse of the precautionary principle.

The Precautionary Principle: Is it Safe

in European Journal of Health Law

Sections

References

  • 1)

    United Nations General Assembly. 1992. “Rio Declaration on Environment and Development.” Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development Rio de Janeiro June 3-14 1992. A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. I). New York: UN. Retrieved 15 January 2013 http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm.

  • 2)

    I.B. Pless“Expanding the precautionary principle”Injury Prevention 9(1) (2003) 1-2.

  • 3)

    B.D. Goldstein‘The precautionary principle also applies to public health actions’American Journal of Public Health 91(9) (2001) 1358-62.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 4)

    B.D. Goldstein“Problems in applying the precautionary principle to public health”Occupational & Environmental Medicine 64(9) (2007) 71-4.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 5)

    P. Fugelli“The Zero-vision: potential side effects of communicating health perfection and zero risk”Patient Education & Counselling 60(3) (2006) 267-71.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 9)

    Judgment of the Court of 5 May 1998. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v. Commission of the European Communities [1998]. Case C-180/96. European Court reports 1998 Page I-02265.

  • 14)

    D. Resnik“The precautionary principle and medical decision making”The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29(3) (2004) 281-99.

  • 15)

    D. Resnik“Is the precautionary principle unscientific?”Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34 (2003) 329-44.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 16)

    D.L. Weed“Precaution, prevention, and public health ethics”The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29(3) (2004) 313-32.

  • 17)

    S. Alban“The ‘precautionary principle’ as a guide for future drug development”European Journal of Clinical Investigation 35 (2005) 33-44.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 18)

    M. Peterson“Should the precautionary principle guide our actions or our beliefs?” Journal of Medical Ethics 33(1) (2007) 5-10.

  • 19)

    S. Lacour“A legal version of the nanoworld”Comptes Rendus Physique 12(7) (2011) 693-701.

  • 20)

    M. Basili M. Franzini“Understanding the risk of an avian flu pandemic: rational waiting or precautionary failure?”Risk Analysis 26(3) (2006) 617-30.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 21)

    J. Zarocostas“Swine flu pandemic review panel seeks access to confidential documents between WHO and drug companies”BMJ 340 (2010) 2792.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 22)

    D. Cohen and P. Carter“Conflicts of interest. WHO and the pandemic flu ‘conspiracies’ ”BMJ 340 (2010) 2912.

  • 23)

    B. Nerlich and N. Koteyko“Crying wolf? Biosecurity and metacommunication in the context of the 2009 swine flu pandemic”Health & Place 18(4) (2012) 710-717.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 25)

    J. Tickner and J.M. Coffin“What does the precautionary principle mean for evidence-based dentistry?”Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice 6(1) (2006) 6-15.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 31)

    G.E. Marchant R.A. Lindor“Prudent precaution in clinical trials of nanomedicines”The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 40(4) (2012) 831-40.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 33)

    B.L. Evatt“The AIDS epidemic in haemophilia patients II: pursuing absolute viral safety of clotting factor concentrates 1985-1988”Haemophilia 18(5) (2012) 649-54.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 34)

    V. Derckx and H. Roscam Abbing“Patients rights to health protection and quality and safety of blood (products)”European Journal of Health Law 12(2) (2005) 158-159.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 36)

    S. Alban“The ‘precautionary principle’ as a guide for future drug development”European Journal of Clinical Investigation35(suppl 1) (2005) 33-44.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 37)

    G. David“La Médecine saisie par le principe de précaution”Bulletin de l’Académie Nationale de Médecine 182(6) (1998) 1219-28.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 38)

    F. Demichel“Le droit malade de la peste: les ravages du principe de précaution” Revue Générale de Droit Médical 37 (2010) 303-320.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Index Card

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 49 47 2
Full Text Views 81 81 2
PDF Downloads 15 15 1
EPUB Downloads 1 1 0