Liabilities of a Physician Confronted with Child Abuse

in European Journal of Health Law
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Several research questions raises when physicians are confronted with a possible case of child abuse. First, there is a problem of professional secrecy. In most European countries, physicians have the right to speak when confronted with a state of emergency. In other countries, physicians have a duty to speak and alert the police when the life or physical integrity of a person is at stake. A second topic to be discussed involves the possible liability of physicians who do not report child abuse. By not reporting a case of possible child abuse, the physician is respecting the family life of the parents, even though the child might continue to suffer damages. Third and essentially, I analyse the possible liability of physicians who do inform the prosecutor of a suspected child abuse. Specific criteria are elaborated to establish negligence when physicians report child abuse to the prosecutor.

Liabilities of a Physician Confronted with Child Abuse

in European Journal of Health Law

Sections

References

4)

M. Kottow“Medical confidentiality: an intransigent and absolute obligation”J. Med. Ethics (1986) pp. 117-122.

5)

E. Deutsch and A. SpickhoffMedizinrecht (Berlin: Springer Verlag2008) pp. 404-405; A. Laufs C. Katzenmeier and V. Lipp Artzrecht (München: Verlag Beck 2009) p. 295; A. Braun “Schweigepflicht in Arztpraxis und Krankenhaus” in: C. Roxin and U. Schroth (eds.) Handbuch des Medizinstrafrechts (Stuttgart: Boorberg Verlag 2010) pp. 247-248.

6)

J.K. Mason G.T. Laurie and M. AzizMason and McCall Smith’s Law and medical ethics (New York: Oxford University Press2006) pp. 259-271; A. Grubb J. Laing and J. McHale Principles of medical law (New York: Oxford University Press 2010) nos. 12.47 and 12-97.

7)

Cass.fr. 27 April 2011n° 10-82.200 1778 Jurisdata 2011-007088; G. Memeteau Cours de droit médical (Bordeaux: Les Etudes Hospitalières 2006) p. 269.

9)

H. NysGeneeskunde. Recht en medisch handelen (Mechelen: Kluwer2005) nos. 1280-1289; N. Colette-Basecqz “La violation du secret professionnel dans une situation de maltraitance d’enfant. La justification par l’autorisation de l’article 458bis du Code pénal ou par l’état de nécessité” Tijdschrift Gezondheidsrecht/Revue Droit Santé (2009-2010) 23.

13)

J. Dute“Child abuse, human rights and the role of the doctor”EJHL (2009) 121-122.

16)

OLG Frankfurt 8 July 1999NJW 2000 875.

23)

M. Hall M. Bobinski and D. OrentlicherHealth care law and ethics (New York: Aspen Publishers2007) p. 185.

27)

Cass.fr. 27 April 2011no. 10-82.200 1778 Jurisdata 2011-007088.

37)

Clerk & LindsellOn Torts (London: Thomson Reuters2010) no. 16-09.

38)

D. DobbsThe Law of Torts (St. Paul, MN: West Group2000) p. 1216.

43)

D. Verhoeven“Aangifte van een misdrijf aan een gerechtelijke overheid en civielrechtelijke aansprakelijkheid,” Tijdschrift Gezondheidsrecht/Revue Droit Santé (2012-2013) 29; P. Le Tourneau Droit de la responsabilité et des contrats (Paris: Dalloz 2008) p. 1391.

44)

A. Grubb J. Laing and J. McHalePrinciples of Medical Law (New York: Oxford University Press2010) p. 193.

45)

T. VansweeveltDe civielrechtelijke aansprakelijkheid van de geneesheer en het ziekenhuis (Antwerp: Maklu1992) p. 136.

46)

Cass.fr. 3 May 2006 no. 04-19.504JurisData 2006-033305; P. Le Tourneau Droit de la responsabilité et des contrats (Paris: Dalloz 2008) p. 1391.

47)

Cass.fr. 9 March 2000Semaine Juridique 2000 IV p. 1729.

49)

ECHR 30 September 2008 38000/05R.K. and A.K. v. The United Kingdomwww.echr.coe.int. (a baby of only a few months suffered a serious and unexplained femoral fracture which was attributed to child abuse but which later turns out to be osteogenesis imperfecta (OL commonly known as brittle bone disease) a very rare condition and difficult to diagnose in very small children. No violation of art. 8 ECHR.

50)

ECHR 23 March 201045901/05 and 40146/06 M.A.K. and R.K. v. The United Kingdomwww.echr.coe.int.

52)

Court of Amsterdam 13 June 2012www.rechtspraak.nl.

54)

Court of Haarlem 17 May 2006www.rechtspraak.nl.

55)

Court of Brussels 8 February 1999Tijdschrift Gezondheidsrecht/Revue Droit Santé 2000-2001 p. 220; cf. Court of Amsterdam 20 May 2009 www.rechtspraak.nl.

56)

Hoge Raad 21 november 2003www.jure.nl. conclusions Attorney-General De Vries Lentsch-Kostense.

57)

ECHR 17 December 2002 35731/97Venema v. The Netherlandswww.echr.coe.int.; it is also essential that a parent should be placed in a position where he or she may obtain access to information which is relied on by the authorities in taking measures of protective care: ECHR 10 May 2001 28945/95 T.P. and K.M. v. United Kingdomwww.echr.coe.int.; compare ECHR 12 February 2008 38000/05 EJHL 2008 319.

60)

ECHR 10 May 2001 28945/95T.P. and K.M. v. United Kingdomwww.echr.coe.int.

74)

C. Williams“The trouble with paediatricians”Med.L.Rev. (2010) p. 412.

75)

Court of Amsterdam 13 June 2012www.rechtspraak.nl.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 31 31 7
Full Text Views 22 22 20
PDF Downloads 4 4 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0