Advance Directives in Some Western European Countries: A Legal and Ethical Comparison between Spain, France, England, and Germany

In: European Journal of Health Law

We have studied national laws on advance directives in various Western European countries: Romance-speaking countries (Italy, France, Portugal, and Spain), English-speaking countries (Ireland and the United Kingdom), and German-speaking countries (Austria, Germany, and Switzerland). We distinguish two potentially complementary types of advance medical declaration: the ‘living will’ and the nomination of a legal proxy. After examining the similarities and differences between countries, we analyse in detail the legislation of four countries (Spain, France, England, and Germany), since the other countries in this survey have similar legal principles and/or a similar political approach. In conclusion, we note that in all the countries examined, advance directives have been seen as an instrument to enable the patient’s right to self-determination. Notwithstanding, in Romance-speaking countries, the involvement of physicians in the end-of-life process and risks arising from the execution of advance directives were also considered.

  • 1

    C. Gabl and R.J. Jox‘Paternalism and autonomy — no contradiction’Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift 158(23-24) (2008) 642-649.

  • 29

    In Austria: Judiciary Committee 2006‘Report of the law 2006 — swräg 2006’. Retrieved 18 March 2015; in Germany: Legal Committee 2009 ‘Recommendation of the legal Committee’. Retrieved 18 March 2015; and in Switzerland: Swiss National Advisory Commission on Biomedical Ethics 2011 ‘Opinion 17/2011’. Retrieved 18 March 2015

  • 31

    In France: National Assembly 2008‘Mission d’évaluation de la loi n° 2005-370 du 22 avril 2005 relative aux droits des malades et à la fin de vie n° 1287’. Retrieved 18 March 2015; in Italy: National Committee of Bioethics 2003 ‘Dichiarazioni anticipate di trattamento’. Retrieved 18 March 2015 In the Iberian countries risks arising from the implementation of ads are highlighted through a strict bureaucratic model. In particular in Spain most Autonomous Communities’ regulations establish several formal requirements: M. Navarro-Michel ‘Advance Directives: the Spanish Perspective’ Medical Law Review 13(2) (2005) 137-169. The same strict bureaucratic model is used in the Portuguese law of 2012. A.D. Pereira ‘Living will and health care proxy — the Portuguese legal situation’ Medicine and Law 32(4) (2013) 497-502.

  • 41

    D. ParfitReasons and Persons (Oxford: Oxford University Press1984).

  • 42

    J.H. Lingler D. Rubin and J.A. Saxton‘Temporal stability of receptiveness to clinical research on Alzheimer disease in Alzheimer disease’Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 24 (2010) S30-S34; M.N. Witting K.H. Morales L.A. Meoni D.E. Ford N.Y. Wang M.J. Klag and J.J. Gallo ‘Stability of preferences for end-of-life treatment after 3 years of follow-up: the Johns Hopkins Precursors Study’ Schistosomiasis 168(19) (2008) 2125-2130; P.H. Ditto W.D. Smucker J.H. Danks J.A. Jacobson R.M. Houts A. Fagerlin K.M. Coppola and R.M. Gready ‘Stability of older adults’ preferences for life-sustaining medical treatment’ Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology American Psychological Association 22(6) (2003) 605-615.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 53

    Eurostat 2015‘Crude marriage rate selected years 1960-2012’ demonstrates that in 2011 the rate of divorce in uk is 2.1 and in Italy is 0.9. Retrieved 18 March 2015

  • 56

    R. Pereira‘Human handicap and self-determination: compassion and insensibility in the Vincent Humbert case’História ciências saúde — Manguinhos 14(1) (2007) 119-34; B.M. Dupont ‘Refuse a “Vincent Humbert law’ Médecine palliative 4(6) (2005) 309-311.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 65

    D. Veshi and G. Neitzke‘Living wills in Italy: ethical and comparative law approaches’European Journal of Health Law 22(1) (2015) 38-60.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 66

    J.L. Holley‘Palliative care in end-stage renal disease: focus on advance care planning, hospice referral, and bereavement’Seminars in Dialysis 18(2) (2005) 154-156.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 76

    French National Medical Council 2000‘Avis sur Fin de vie arrêt de vie euthanasie’. Retrieved 18 March 2015

  • 84

    J. LockeThe Two Treatises of Government (London: Everyman Paperback1993) [original work published 1690].

  • 85

    J.S. MillOn Liberty (New York: Simon & Brown2012) [original work published 1865].

  • 86

    D.L. Dickenson‘Cross-cultural issues in European bioethics’Bioethics 13 (3-4) (1999) 249-255.

  • 87

    General Medical Council 2008‘Consent: Patients and doctors making decisions together’2008. Retrieved 18 March 2015; General Medical Council 2010 ‘Treatment and care towards the end of life: Good practices in decision making’. Retrieved 18 March 2015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 97

    T.M. Pope‘The best interest standard: both guide and limit to medical decision making on behalf of incapacitated patients’The Journal of Clinical Ethics 22(2) (2011) 134-138.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 108

    C. Schroder G. Schmutzer and E. Brahler‘Representative survey of German people concerning enlightenment and patient directive in a case of terminal illness’Psychotherapie Psychosomatik Medizinische Psychologie 52(5) (2002) 236-243.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 109

    F.R. Lang and G.G. Wagner‘Patient living wills in Germany: conditions for their increase and reasons for refusal’Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift 132 (48) (2007) 2558-2562; F. Lang P. Baltes and G. Wagner ‘Desired lifetime and end-of-life desires across adulthood from 20 to 90: a dual-source information model’ The Journals of Gerontology. Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 62(5) (2007) 268-278.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 247 179 42
Full Text Views 215 36 2
PDF Downloads 32 25 3