Free Movement of Students and the Protection of National Educational Interests: Reflections on Bressol and Chaverot

in European Journal of Migration and Law
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

Abstract

Free movement of students is one of EU law’s most important achievements, but it cannot be denied that its beneficiaries are in fact free-riders who enjoy education to the financing of which they do not significantly contribute. The legitimacy of EU law is at stake when it condones situations in which 50%, 60%, 70% and sometimes even more of the chairs in lecture halls and classrooms are occupied by non-resident students. Bressol and Chaverot demonstrates that the ECJ has an eye on national educational interests, but suggests that these can only justify restrictions on non-residents’ access in exceptional circumstances.

Free Movement of Students and the Protection of National Educational Interests: Reflections on Bressol and Chaverot

in European Journal of Migration and Law

Sections

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 22 22 4
Full Text Views 28 28 16
PDF Downloads 5 5 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0