Verifying the Family? A Comparison of DNA Analysis for Family Reunification in Three European Countries (Austria, Finland and Germany)

in European Journal of Migration and Law

Abstract

This article explores and compares the legal frameworks and regulatory practices of the use of DNA analysis for family reunification in Austria, Finland, and Germany. Based on a document analysis, we first provide an overview of the international legislation for family reunification and analyse the situation in the European Union. We show that the three countries have significantly different legislative practices in place to regulate parental testing in immigration contexts and to verify family relations. We outline the key societal and political implications that are associated with these country specific forms of legislation and regulatory practices and highlight the ambivalent role of DNA analysis in family reunification.

  • 1)

    European Migration Network (2008) Family Reunification: Synthesis Report. This and all following reports ad-hoc queries and other resources from the European Migration Network are available online at http://emn.intrasoft-intl.com/ (accessed 28 February 2013); Eurostat ‘Residence permits issued to non-EU citizens’ 43 Eurostat Statistics in Focus (2011) 1–8; A. Müller (2012) Misuse of the Right to Family Reunification: Marriages of convenience and false declarations of parenthood Nuremberg: Federal Office for Migration and Refugees; G. Ruffer ‘Pushed beyond Recognition? The Liberality of Family Reunification Policies in the EU’ 37 Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies (2011) 935–951.

  • 2)

    European Migration Network (2008) supra fn. 1; European Migration Network (2009) Ad-Hoc Query on Conducting other investigation (using a DNA test) in family reunification; T. Heinemann and T. Lemke ‘Suspect families: DNA kinship testing in German immigration policy’ Sociology in press DOI: 10.1177/0038038512454352; E. La Spina ‘DNA Testing for Family Reunification in Europe: An Exceptional Resource?’ 6 Migraciones Internacionales (2012) 39–74.

  • 5)

    See also K. Jastram and K. Newland (2003) ‘Family Unity and Refugee Protection in: E. Feller V. Türk and F. Nicholson (eds) Refugee protection in international law. UNHCR’s global consultations on international protection Cambridge: Cambridge University Press pp. 555–603.

  • 8)

    A. John (2003) Family Reunification for Migrants and Refugees – A Forgotten Human Right? M.A. Thesis. Human Rights Centre University of Coimbra Coimbra available online at http://www.fd.uc.pt/hrc/pdf/papers/arturojohn.pdf (accessed 28 February 2013); see also Cholewinski (2002) supra fn. 6.

  • 10)

    Schibel (2004)supra fn. 9.

  • 12)

    European Migration Network (2008) supra fn. 1 European Migration Network (2009) Ad-Hoc Query on Age limit for Family reunification; European Migration Network (2010) Ad-Hoc Query on Family Reunification for Minors; European Migration Network (2010) Ad-Hoc Query on the concept of family member.

  • 13)

    European Commission (2008) Report on the application of Directive 2003/86 on family reunification of third country nationals available online at http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-08–611_en.htm (accessed 28 February 2013).

  • 16)

    European Migration Network (2012) Misuse of the Right to Family Reunification: Marriages of Convenience and False Declarations of Parenthood Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

  • 19)

    J. Ecker (2008) Familienzusammenführung. Die Umsetzung der Richtlinie 2003/86/EG in Österreich Wien: Verlag Österreich.

  • 21)

    European Migration Network (2010) Ad-Hoc Query on the concept of family membersupra fn. 12.

  • 22)

    A. Walter (2009) Familienzusammenführung in Europa. Völkerrecht Gemeinschaftsrecht Nationales Recht Baden-Baden: Nomos

  • 24)

    Bundesregierung (2008) DNS-Abstammungsgutachten im Rahmen von aufenthaltsrechtlichen Identitätsfeststellungen Drucksache 16/7698 available online at http://dipbt.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/16/ 076/1607698.pdf (accessed 28 February 2013); W. Frenz ‘Begrenzung ausländerrechtlicher Maßnahmen durch europäische Grundrechte‘ 28 Zeitschrift für Ausländerrecht und Ausländerpolitik (2008) 385–388.

  • 26)

    Migration Policy Index (2011) Family Reunion Available at http://www.mipex.eu/family-reunion (accessed 28 February 2013).

  • 29)

    See P. Hautamäki (2007) ‘Diasporic Authenticity: Connecting Genes and Building Families through DNA Testing in Somali Family Reunification in Finland’ in A. Kusow and S. Bjork (eds) From Mogadishu to Dixon: The Somali Diaspora in a Global Context Trenton NJ: Red Sea Press pp. 119–133; P. Hautamäki (2004) Pojat! Somalipoikien kiistanalainen nuoruus Suomessa Helsinki: Nuorisotutkimusverkosto especially pp. 139–162. Somalis were singled out in the ad hoc query on DNA testing and they were also targeted by the policies of DNA testing in the USA. See European Migration Network (2009) supra fn. 2; S. Villiers ‘Brave New World: The Use and Potential Misuse of DNA Technology in Immigration Law’ 30 Boston College Third World Law Journal (2010) 239–271.

  • 30)

    R. McKie‘Eureka moment that led to the discovery of DNA fingerprinting’The Observer (24 May 2009) 16; see also A.J. Jeffreys V. Wilson and S.L. Thein ‘Individual-specific “fingerprints” of human DNA’ 316 Nature (1985) 76–79.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • 32)

    COM 2011 735supra fn. 15.

  • 33)

    European Migration Network (2009)supra fn. 2.

  • 34)

    COM 2011 735supra fn 15.

  • 35)

    Finnish Ministry of the Interior (2012) Replies to the questions in the Green Paper on Family reunification available online at http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-is-new/public-consultation/2012/pdf/0023/famreun/memberstatesnationalgovernments/finland_en.pdf (accessed 28 February 2013).

  • 40)

    Finnish Immigration Service (2008) DNA Testing has United a Record Number of Immigrant Familiesavailable online at http://www.migri.fi/for_the_media/releases/press_releases/press_releases/1/0/dna_testing_has_united_a_record_number_of_immigrant_families (accessed 28 February 2013).

  • 42)

    J. Mourão Permoser (2010) Redefining Membership: European Union Policy on the Rights of Third-Country Nationals PhD Thesis University of Vienna Vienna.

  • 45)

    Bundesasylamt (2010) Information für Antragsteller im Ausland zur Möglichkeit einer DNA-Analyse Handout of the Bundesasylamt.

  • 46)

    No. 27.0.5 of the AVwV AufenthG 2009.

  • 47)

    Heinemann and Lemke (2012)supra fn. 2.

  • 50)

    Bundesregierung (2008)supra fn. 10; Bundesregierung (2010) Vorwürfe gegen Ausländerbehörden wegen Gentests bei binationalen Eltern.

  • 52)

    Heinemann & Lemke (2012)supra fn. 2.

  • 53)

    See J. Villiers (2010)supra fn. 29.

  • 57)

    B. Prainsack (2010) ‘Key issues in DNA profiling and databasing: implications for governance’ in: R. Hindmarsh and B. Prainsack (eds) Genetic suspects: Global governance of forensic DNA profiling and databasing Cambridge: Cambridge University Press pp. 15–39.; E. Zadok G. Ben-Or and G. Fisman (2010) ‘Forensic utilisation of voluntarily collected DNA samples: law enforcement versus human rights’ in: R. Hindmarsh and B. Prainsack (eds) Genetic suspects: Global governance of forensic DNA profiling and databasing Cambridge: Cambridge University Press pp. 40–62.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 100 99 4
Full Text Views 144 144 3
PDF Downloads 24 24 3