The European Union Never got Rid of Its Internal Controls

A Case Study of Detention and Readmission in the French-Spanish Border

In: European Journal of Migration and Law
View More View Less
  • 1 Department of Administrative, Constitutional and Philosophy of Law, University of the Basque Country UPV-EHU, Spain

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€25.00$30.00

Abstract

The police station in Irun, a border town between the Spanish and French states, has the highest inter-annual data of arrests of foreigners in irregular situations when compared to other police stations in the Basque Country. This pattern, of which many are unaware, is due to police identity checks in the border surroundings. The place where the border barrier was once, was occupied by a car toll booth constructed with a very particular structure: as a border, with cabins for police officers. In addition, the data for border readmission between these two states, under an agreement signed in 2002, requires special attention: 300,000 people were deported across the Northern border. 70% of the people detained in the French Detention Centre at Hendaia in 2015 were caught at the border. This case study on the Spanish-French border will shed some light on a disregarded topic: internal borders. Regulation in these areas is diverse. Many exceptions and specificities apply, in parallel or alternatively to the ordinary immigration rules, as a matter of exception to the law. In considering this, we need to rethink the image of a borderless Europe as stated by the Schengen agreement. Since the publication of Balibar’s essay ‘What is a border?’ (2005), the controls have multiplied all along the territory as a kaleidoscopic vision. The eu internal borders have never disappeared, but have mutated into a police managed model of internal borders.

  • Alscher, S. (2005). Knocking at the Doors of ‘Fortress Europe’: Migration and Border Control in Southern Spain and Eastern Poland, San Diego: Center for Comparative Immigration Studies, University of California.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Balibar, E. (2002). Politics and the other scene, London: Verso.

  • Barbero, I. (2012). Orientalising citizenship: the legitimation of immigration regimes in the European Union. Citizenship studies, 16(5–6), 751768.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bigo D. (2008). ‘Globalized (In)Security: The field and the Ban-Opticon’, in: D. Bigo & A. Tsoukala (eds), Terror, Insecurity and Liberty. Illiberal practices of liberal regimes after 9/11, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1048.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bigo, D., E. Brouwer, S. Carrera, E. Guild, E.P. Guittet, J. Jeandesboz & A. Scherrer (2015). The EU counter-terrorism policy responses to the attacks in Paris: Towards an EU security and liberty agenda, CEPS Papers in Liberty and Security in Europe (81), Brussels: CEPS.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bray, Z. (2007). ‘Boundaries in a “borderless” Europe: European Integration and Cross-Frontier Cooperation in the Basque Country’, in: Harlan Koff (ed.) Deceiving (Dis)Appearances: analyzing current developments in European and North American border regions, Brussels: PIE Peter Lang, pp. 119136.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Breen, D. (2016). ‘Abuses at Europe’s borders’, Forced Migration Review (51): 21.

  • Carling, J. (2007). ‘Unauthorized migration from Africa to Spain’, International Migration 45(4): 337.

  • Carr, M. (1997). ‘Policing the frontier: Ceuta and Melilla’, Race & class 39(1): 6166.

  • Carrera, S. & E. Guild (2014). The European Council’s Guidelines for the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice 2020: Subverting the ‘Lisbonisation’of Justice and Home Affairs?, CEPS Essay No. 13, Brussels: CEPS.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Chueca, A., P. Aguelo, I. Almandoz, J.R. Puig Pellicer & M. Batalla (2006). Informe sobre la problemática de la asistencia letrada en las fronteras interiores Schengen, Subcomisión de Extranjería del Consejo General de la Abogacía, Madrid: Consejo general de la Abogacía Española.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ferrer-Gallardo, X. (2008). ‘The Spanish–Moroccan border complex: Processes of geopolitical, functional and symbolic rebordering’, Political Geography 27(3): 301321.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Guild, E. (2009). Security and Migration in the 21st Century, Cambridge: Polity.

  • Guild, E., S. Carrera, L. Vosiliûte, C.A. Groenendijk, E. Brouwer, D. Bigo, J. Jeandesboz Médéric & M. Martin-Mazé (2016). Internal border controls in the Schengen area. Is Schengen crisis-proof?, Brussels: CEPS.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Harguindéguy, J.B. & Z. Bray (2009). ‘Does cross-border cooperation empower European regions? The case of INTERREG III-A France–Spain’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27(4): 747760.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Klepp, S. (2010). ‘A contested asylum system: The European Union between refugee protection and border control in the Mediterranean Sea’, European Journal of Migration and Law 12(1): 121.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • La Cimade, Assfam, Forum Réfugiés, France terre d’asile, & l’Ordre de Malte (2016). Centres et locaux de rétention administrative. Rapport 2015, http://www.lacimade.org/publication/rapport-2015-sur-centre-et-locaux-de-retention-administrative/.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lafourcade, M. (1998). ‘La frontière franco-espagnole, lieu de conflits interétatiques et de collaboration interrégionale’, in: M. Lafourcade (ed.), La Frontière Franco-Espagnole: lieu de conflits interétatiques et de collaboration interrégionale. Actes de la journée d’études du 16 novembre 1996, Biarritz: Presses Universitaires de Bordeaux.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lasagabaster, I. (2016). ‘La regulación de la expulsión de extranjeros en la ley de seguridad ciudadana y la prohibición de tratos inhumanos y degradantes. Breve consideración sobre la situación en la frontera de Ceuta y Melilla’, in: N. Arrese & I. Barbero (eds.), Tensiones entre las políticas de extranjería y los Derechos Humanos, Colección Derechos Humanos, Barcelona: Tirant lo Blanch, pp. 117142.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • López-Sala, A. (2015). ‘Exploring dissuasion as a (geo)political instrument in irregular migration control at the Southern Spanish maritime border’, Geopolitics 20(3): 513534.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Martínez Escamilla, M. & J.M. Sánchez Tomás (2016). ‘Devoluciones ilegales en la frontera sur. Análisis jurídico de las denominadas devoluciones en caliente’, in: María Luisa Maqueda Abreu, María Martín Lorenzo & Arturo Ventura Püschel (eds.), Derecho Penal para un estado social y democrático de derecho: estudios pena les en homenaje al profesor Emilio Octavio de Toledo y Ubieto, Madrid: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid, pp. 10811103.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Mrabet, El Arbi (2003). ‘Readmission agreements: The Case of Morocco,’ European Journal of Migration and Law 5: 379385.

  • Mutlu, C.E. & C.C. Leite (2012). ‘Dark Side of the Rock: Borders, Exceptionalism, and the Precarious Case of Ceuta and Melilla’, Eurasia Border Review 3(2): 2139.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Observatorio hispano-francés de Tráfico en los Pirineos (2016). Principales Cifras actualizadas paras los año 2013 y 2014, Madrid: Ministerio de Fomento.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Puig Pellicer, J.R. (2006). ‘Asistencia letrada en la frontera de la Jonquera’, Revista de derecho migratorio y extranjería 13: 279282.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Ribas-Mateos, N. (2016). Border Shifts: New Mobilities in Europe and Beyond, Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Sahlins, P. (1989). Boundaries: The making of France and Spain in the Pyrenees, Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Schieffer, M. (2003). ‘Community readmission agreements with third countries–objectives, substance and current state of negotiations’, European Journal of Migration and Law 5(3): 343357.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Strik, T. (2010). Readmission Agreements: A Mechanism for Returning Irregular Migrants, Doc. 12168, 16 March 2010, Strasbourg: Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Suárez-Navaz, L. (2005). Rebordering the Mediterranean: boundaries and citizenship in southern Europe, New Directions in Anthropology, Vol. 17, Oxford/New York: Berghahn Books .

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Triandafyllidou, A. (ed.) (2016). Irregular migration in Europe: myths and realities. London: Routledge.

  • Van der Woude, M. & P. van Berlo (2015). ‘Crimmigration at the Internal Borders of Europe? Examining the Schengen Governance Package’, Utrecht Law Review 11(1): 6179.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van der Woude, M. & J. van der Leun (2017). ‘Crimmigration checks in the internal border areas of the EU: Finding the discretion that matters’, European journal of criminology 14(1): 2745.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Vollmer, B.A. (2011). ‘Policy Discourses on Irregular Migration in the EU-‘Number Games’ and “Political Games” ’, European Journal of Migration and Law 13(3): 317339.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Worth, J. (2014). Non-Schengen compliant border control between Rzepin and Frankfurt (Oder), 11th March 2014, 2156 Euroblog.

  • Zapata-Barrero, R. & N.D. Witte (2007). ‘The Spanish governance of EU borders: Normative questions’, Mediterranean Politics 12(1): 8590.

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 530 156 12
Full Text Views 336 44 3
PDF Views & Downloads 108 21 4