J. Sim, ‘Collecting and analyzing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group’, Journal of Advanced Nursing (1998), 28, pp. 345–352, at p. 346.

 J. Sim, ‘Collecting and analyzing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group’, Journal of Advanced Nursing (1998), 28, pp. 345–352, at p. 346.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 See Clare Watkins, ‘Practicing Ecclesiology: from product to process. The theological action research framework of theology in four voices, and the development of ecclesiology as a non-correlative process and practice’, Ecclesial Practices. Journal of Ecclesiology and Ethnography 2/1 (2015), pp. 23–39, at p. 36.

 See Clare Watkins, ‘Practicing Ecclesiology: from product to process. The theological action research framework of theology in four voices, and the development of ecclesiology as a non-correlative process and practice’, Ecclesial Practices. Journal of Ecclesiology and Ethnography 2/1 (2015), pp. 23–39, at p. 36.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 R. Gomm, Social Research Methodology: A Critical Introduction (London: Palgrave, 2004), p. 173.

 R. Gomm, Social Research Methodology: A Critical Introduction (London: Palgrave, 2004), p. 173.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Berg, p. 149.

 Gomm, p. 172.

 Carla Willig, Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology. Adventures in Theory and Method, (Buckingham / Philadelphia: Open University Press, 2001), p. 30.

 Carla Willig, Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology. Adventures in Theory and Method, (Buckingham / Philadelphia: Open University Press, 2001), p. 30.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Berg, p. 146.

 Wellington and Szczerbinski, p. 90.

 Bente Halkier, ‘Focus groups as social enactments: integrating interaction and content in the analysis of focus group data’, Qualitative Research 10/1 (2010), pp. 71–89. Also see M. Grønkjær, T. Curtis, C. de Crespigny and C. Delmar, ‘Analyzing group interaction in focus group research: Impact on content and the role of the moderator’, Qualitative Studies 2/1 (2010), pp. 16–30.

 Bente Halkier, ‘Focus groups as social enactments: integrating interaction and content in the analysis of focus group data’, Qualitative Research 10/1 (2010), pp. 71–89. Also see M. Grønkjær, T. Curtis, C. de Crespigny and C. Delmar, ‘Analyzing group interaction in focus group research: Impact on content and the role of the moderator’, Qualitative Studies 2/1 (2010), pp. 16–30.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Boeije, p. 65.

 Hennink, p. 5.

 Gomm, p. 171.

 Jenny Kitzinger, ‘The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants’, Sociology of Health and Illness 16/1 (1994), pp. 103–121, at p. 105.

 Jenny Kitzinger, ‘The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants’, Sociology of Health and Illness 16/1 (1994), pp. 103–121, at p. 105.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Grønkjær et al., p. 24.

 Hennink, p. 9.

 Marian Pitts and Anthony Smith, Researching the Margins. Strategies for Ethical and Rigorous Research with Marginalized Communities (Houndmills, Basingstoke / New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2007), p. 140.

 Marian Pitts and Anthony Smith, Researching the Margins. Strategies for Ethical and Rigorous Research with Marginalized Communities (Houndmills, Basingstoke / New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2007), p. 140.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Vaughn, Shum and Sinagub, p. 48.

 Wellington and Szczerbinski, p. 20.

 Richard Osmer, Practical Theology. An Introduction (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2008), p. 48.

 Richard Osmer, Practical Theology. An Introduction (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2008), p. 48.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Hennink, p. 12.

 Höhmann, Krech, p. 186.

 Hermelink, p. 420.

 See Harald Hegstad, The Real Church. An Ecclesiology of the Visible (Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2013).

 See Harald Hegstad, The Real Church. An Ecclesiology of the Visible (Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2013).)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Remco C.W. Feskens, Difficult Groups in Survey Research and the Development of Tailor-made Approach Strategies (Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht / Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, 2009), p. 51.

 Remco C.W. Feskens, Difficult Groups in Survey Research and the Development of Tailor-made Approach Strategies (Utrecht: Universiteit Utrecht / Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, 2009), p. 51.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Feskens, p. 54 and pp. 59–68.

 Scheyvens, Scheyvens, Murray, p. 179.

 Dowling, p.32.

 Henk de Roest, Communicative Identity. Habermas’ Perspectives of Discourse as a Support for Practical Theology (Kampen: Kok, 1998), pp. 219ff.

 Henk de Roest, Communicative Identity. Habermas’ Perspectives of Discourse as a Support for Practical Theology (Kampen: Kok, 1998), pp. 219ff.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Bosco and Herman, p. 194.

 Bryman, p. 480.

 Hosking, p. 12.

 Bouwen and Hovelynck, p. 128.

 Bouwen and Hovelynck, p. 130.

 Bouwen and Hovelynck, p. 138.

 Dian Marie Hosking, ‘Telling tales of relations: Appreciating relational constructionism’, Organization Studies 32/1 (2011), 47–65, at p. 55.

 Dian Marie Hosking, ‘Telling tales of relations: Appreciating relational constructionism’, Organization Studies 32/1 (2011), 47–65, at p. 55.)| false
• Search Google Scholar
• Export Citation

 Kitzinger, p. 111.

 Cameron, p. 156.