Presenting an Admirable Self: Moral Evaluation within the Interview
In: Ecclesial PracticesSearch for other papers by Emily Z. Dubie in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
This article considers the complicated nature of self-reporting within the in-depth interview. Despite the adoption of ethnographic methods in Christian ethics and related disciplines, the accuracy of interview data has received relatively little attention. Drawing upon my fieldwork with Christian social workers in the American southeast, as well as sociological and anthropological sources, I argue that research participants frequently endeavor to present an admirable portrait of themselves. Through selecting, omitting, and revising their stories, they undertake a kind of moral work, assessing their actions and attitudes according to available ethical criteria. Broader cultural norms, their own moral ideals, and anticipations of the interviewer’s judgments all supply resources for self-evaluation. Rather than presenting a methodological problem, understanding this possible dynamic within the interview supplies the Christian ethicist with firsthand insights into the moral labors of naming a good life.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 154 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 126 | 68 | 4 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 106 | 31 | 1 |
Presenting an Admirable Self: Moral Evaluation within the Interview
In: Ecclesial PracticesSearch for other papers by Emily Z. Dubie in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
This article considers the complicated nature of self-reporting within the in-depth interview. Despite the adoption of ethnographic methods in Christian ethics and related disciplines, the accuracy of interview data has received relatively little attention. Drawing upon my fieldwork with Christian social workers in the American southeast, as well as sociological and anthropological sources, I argue that research participants frequently endeavor to present an admirable portrait of themselves. Through selecting, omitting, and revising their stories, they undertake a kind of moral work, assessing their actions and attitudes according to available ethical criteria. Broader cultural norms, their own moral ideals, and anticipations of the interviewer’s judgments all supply resources for self-evaluation. Rather than presenting a methodological problem, understanding this possible dynamic within the interview supplies the Christian ethicist with firsthand insights into the moral labors of naming a good life.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 154 | 0 | 0 |
| Full Text Views | 126 | 68 | 4 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 106 | 31 | 1 |
