Space Diplomacy and the International Space Station
In: European Review of International StudiesSearch for other papers by Laura Cashman in
Current site
Google Scholar
Search for other papers by Sarah Liebermann in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Debates regarding spacepower, and within this, what is meant by space diplomacy, are in their infancy. This article seeks to contribute to these academic discussions and reflects on the role of the International Space Station (iss) as an asset of space diplomacy. Although it has been showcased as a successful venture of multilateral science diplomacy, US structural power has ensured that it has first and foremost been a means to project US power and reward strategic partners. As the deadline for decommissioning looms, we argue that now is the time to consider the contributions the iss has made to space diplomacy and reflect on what will be lost when its life ends.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
Abolarin, Kehinde. ‘The Nigerian Space Sector: Structure of Power Analysis’. In The Commercialisation of Space: Politics, Economics and Ethics, eds. Sarah Lieberman, Harald Köpping-Athanasopoulou and Thomas Hoerber (Abingdon: Routledge, 2023), pp. 56–80.
-
Alfathimy, Deden HA, Yunita Permatasari, Euis Susilawati, Dini Susanti, Shinta R. Diana, Joko Susanto, and Aristyo R. Darmawan. ‘The Indo-Pacific and Space Diplomacy: Opportunities and Challenges’. Astropolitics vol. 20, no. 1 (2022), pp. 43–63.
-
Ayhan, Kadir Jun. ‘The Boundaries of Public Diplomacy and Nonstate Actors: A Taxonomy of Perspectives’. International Studies Perspectives vol. 20, no. 1 (2019), pp. 63–83.
-
Barston, Ronald Peter. Modern Diplomacy. (Abingdon: Routledge, 2019).
-
Borowitz, Mariel. ‘Let’s Just Talk About the Weather: Weather Satellites and Space Diplomacy’. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy vol.18, no. 2–3 (2023), pp. 409–436.
-
Bowen, Bleddyn E. War in space: Strategy, Spacepower, Geopolitics. (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2020).
-
Braunschvig, David, Richard L. Garwin and Jeremy C. Marwell. ‘Space diplomacy’. Foreign Affairs vol 82 (2003), pp. 156–164.
-
Byrne, Caitlin, ‘Public diplomacy’. In Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases. eds. Steve Smith, Amelia Hadfield and Tim Dunne (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016), pp.168–185.
-
Chiu, Nikita. ‘Orbis non sufficit – Co-operation and Discord in Global Space and Disarmament Governance’. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy vol.18, no. 2–3 (2023), pp. 351–379.
-
Constantinou, Costas M. and James Der Derian. ‘Introduction: Sustaining Global Hope: Sovereignty, Power and the Transformation of Diplomacy’. In Sustainable Diplomacies, eds. Costas M. Constantinou and James Der Derian (London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2010), pp. 1–22.
-
Cowan, Geoffrey, and Amelia Arsenault. ‘Moving From Monologue to Dialogue to Collaboration: The Three Layers of Public Diplomacy.’ The Annals of the American academy of Political and Social Science vol. 616, no. 1 (2008), pp. 10–30.
-
Cross, Mai’a K. Davis. ‘The Social Construction of the Space Race: Then and Now’. International Affairs 95, no. 6 (2019), pp. 1403–1421.
-
Cross, Mai’a K. Davis and Saadia M. Pekkanen. ‘Introduction. Space Diplomacy: The Final Frontier of Theory and Practice’. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy vol. 18, no. 2–3 (2023), pp. 193–217.
-
Deplano, Rossana. ‘The Artemis Accords: Evolution or Revolution in International Space Law?’. International & Comparative Law Quarterly vol. 70, no. 3 (2021), pp. 799–819.
-
Der Derian, James. On Diplomacy: A Genealogy of Western Estrangement. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987).
-
Equals Three Communications® and Booz Allen Hamilton. ‘Commercial Market Outreach Plan for the International Space Station Report presented to: nasa Headquarters February 2002,’ 2002, available at: https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/o49797051.pdf.
-
Foust, Jeff. ‘iss transition to commercial stations poses challenges for partners’. Space News, 23 February 2022, available at: https://spacenews.com/iss-transition-to-commercial-stations-poses-challenges-for-partners/.
-
Gannon, Megan. ‘Astronaut’s View on Israel-Gaza Conflict: No Borders Visible from Space’. Space.com, 25 July 2014, available at: https://www.space.com/26646-astronaut-view-israel-gaza-violence-from-space.html.
-
Garcia, Mark. ‘Partners Extend International Space Station for Benefit of Humanity’, nasa Blogs, 27 April 2023, available at https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacestation/2023/04/27/partners-extend-international-space-station-for-benefit-of-humanity/.
-
Ghod, Chelsea. ‘New faa Rules Change who Qualifies for Commercial Astronaut Wings’, Space.com, 27 July 2021, available at: https://www.space.com/faa-commercial-astronaut-wings-rule-change.
-
Haas, Peter M. Epistemic Communities, Constructivism, and International Environmental Politics (Abingdon: Routledge, 2015).
-
Halbert, Debora. ‘Intellectual Property Theft and National Security: Agendas and Assumptions’. The Information Society vol. 32, no. 4 (2016), pp. 256–268.
-
Harwood, William. ‘Russia severs ties with U.S. and European space projects; iss operating normally for now’, cbs News, 3 March 2022, available at: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-severs-ties-with-u-s-european-space-projects-iss-operating-normally-for-now/.
-
Hignett, Katherine. ‘Russia Cuts Off U.S. Access to iss, Pledges to Stop Ferrying American Astronauts in 2019’, Newsweek, 31 August 2018, available at: https://www.newsweek.com/russia-cuts-us-access-iss-pledges-stop-ferrying-american-astronauts-2019-1098937.
-
Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (jaxa). ‘Kibo: Japan’s First Human Space Facility’. jaxa. 29 November 2011, available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20111129145716/http://www.jaxa.jp/article/special/kibo/tanaka01_e.html.
-
Jönsson, Christer and Martin Hall. The Essence of Diplomacy (Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations (Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2005).
-
Keck, Margaret E. and Kathryn Sikkink. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1998).
-
Kissinger, Henry. Diplomacy (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994).
-
Kizer Whitt, Kelly. ‘Who owns all the satellites?’ Earth Sky, 8 February 2022, available at: https://earthsky.org/space/who-owns-satellites-company-country/#:~:text=We%20found%20that%2075%20different,least%20one%20satellite%20orbiting%20Earth.
-
Klinger, Julie. M. ‘China, Africa, and the Rest: Recent Trends in Space Science, Technology, and Satellite Development’, Working Paper, No. 2020/38, China Africa Research Initiative (cari), School of Advanced International Studies (sais), Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC. (2020), available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/248166/1/sais-cari-wp38.pdf.
-
Krige, John. ‘nasa as an Instrument of US Foreign Policy.’ In Societal impact of spaceflight eds. Steven J. Dick and Roger D. Launius (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of External Relations, History Division, 2007), pp.207–218.
-
Kupchan, Charles A. ‘The Normative Foundations of Hegemony and the Coming Challenge to Pax Americana’. Security Studies vol. 23, no. 2 (2014), pp. 219–257.
-
Launius, Roger D. ‘An Unintended Consequence of the igy: Eisenhower, Sputnik, the Founding of nasa’. Acta Astronautica vol. 67, no. 1–2 (2010), pp. 254–263.
-
Li, Kunhan, and Maximilian Mayer. ‘China’s Bifurcated Space Diplomacy and Institutional Density’. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy vol.18, no. 2–3 (2023), pp.253–281.
-
Lieberman, Sarah. ‘Strange Spaces: an International Political Economy Reading of Operational Space Programmes’. In Theorising European Space Policy, eds. Thomas C. Hoerber and Emmanuel Sigalas (Abingdon: Routledge, 2017), pp. 127–140.
-
Margolis, Emily A. ‘Microgravity, Macro Investment: Overcoming International Space Station Utilization Challenges Through Managerial Innovation’. In nasa Spaceflight: A History of Innovation, eds. Roger D. Launius and Howard E. McCurdy (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018), pp.321–348.
-
Mauduit, Jean-Christophe. ‘Collaboration Around the International Space Station: Science for Diplomacy and its Implication for U.S.-Russia and China Relations’. In: Proceedings of 7th Annual sais Asia Conference (sais 2018) ed. Jaehan Park (Secure World Foundation: Washington, DC, 2017), available at: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10083727/.
-
Melissen, Jan. ‘Public Diplomacy’. In The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy, eds. Andrew F. Cooper, Jorge Heine and Ramesh Thakur (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp.436–452.
-
Mosendz, Polly. ‘Russian diplomats are trolling the US Space Program’, The Atlantic, 1 May 2014, available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2014/05/russian-diplomats-are-trolling-the-us-space-program/361508/.
-
nasa. ‘National Security Decision Directive 42’ 1982, available at: https://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/nsdd-42.html.
-
nasa. ‘International Space Station,’ 2005, available at: https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/55411main_28%20ISS.pdf.
-
nasa. ‘International Space Station Transition Report,’ January 2022, available at: https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/2022_iss_transition_report-final_tagged.pdf.
-
nasa, ‘International Space Station,’ 2024, available at: https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/main/index.html.
-
Paladini, Stefania. ‘Space Diplomacy: Traditional and Non-traditional Security Issues’. In The New Frontiers of Space, Stefania Paladini (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019), pp. 153–186.
-
Pigman, Geoffrey. Contemporary Diplomacy (Cambridge: Polity, 2010).
-
Polkowska, Małgorzata. ‘Space Diplomacy–Future Perspective’. Humanities and Social Sciences vol. 27, no. 3 (2020), pp. 121–128.
-
Reagan, Ronald. ‘State of the Union Address’, U.S. Capitol, Washington, D.C., 25 January 1984,. http://history.nasa.gov/reagan84.htm.
-
Riordan, Nancy, Miloslav Machoň, and Lucia Csajková. ‘Space Diplomacy and the Artemis Accords’. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy vol. 18, no. 2–3 (2023), pp. 380–408.
-
Ruffini, Pierre-Bruno. Science and Diplomacy: A New Dimension of International Relations (Cham: Springer 2017).
-
Ruttley, Tara M., Julie A. Robinson, and William H. Gerstenmaier. ‘The International Space Station: Collaboration, Utilization, and Commercialization’. Social Science Quarterly vol. 98, no. 4 (2017), pp. 1160–1174.
-
Schweller, Randall. ‘Emerging Powers in an Age of Disorder’. Global Governance vol. 17 no. 3 (2011), pp. 285–297.
-
Strange, Susan. States and Markets (London: Continuum,1994).
-
Singh, Kanishka. ‘Biden extends U.S. support for International Space Station through 2030’. Reuters, 31 December 2021, available at: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-extends-us-support-international-space-station-through-2030-2021-12-31/.
-
Space Foundation. ‘Global Space Economy Rose To $447b In 2020, Continuing Five-Year Growth’. 15 July 2021, available at: https://www.spacefoundation.org/2021/07/15/global-space-economy-rose-to-447b-in-2020-continuing-five-year-growth/.
-
Sumida, Jon. ‘Old Thoughts, New Problems: Mahan and the Consideration of Spacepower’. In Toward a Theory of Spacepower, eds. Charles D. Lutes and Peter L. Hayes (Washington DC: National Defense University Press, 2003), pp.1–12.
-
Sun, Degang, and Yuyou Zhang. ‘Building an ‘Outer Space Silk Road’: China’s Beidou Navigation Satellite System in the Arab World’. Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies (in Asia) vol. 10, no. 3 (2016), pp. 24–49.
-
Tobias, Ben. ‘Russia to pull out of International Space Station’ bbc News, 27 July 2022, available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-62308069.
-
The State Council Information Office (scio) of the People’s Republic of China. ‘China’s Space Activities in 2016’. 2016, available at: http://www.scio.gov.cn/zfbps/ndhf/34120/Document/1537022/1537022.htm.
-
The State Council Information Office (scio) of the People’s Republic of China. ‘China’s Space Program: A 2021 Perspective’. 2022, available at: http://english.scio.gov.cn/whitepapers/2022-01/28/content_78016877_7.htm.
-
Turekian, Vaughan C., Sarah Macindoe, Daryl Copeland, Lloyd S. Davis, Robert G. Patman and Maria Pozza. ‘The Emergence of Science Diplomacy’. In Science diplomacy: New day or false dawn? eds. Lloyd S. Davis and Robert G. Patman (Singapore: World Scientific 2015), pp. 3–24.
-
United Nations. ‘Treaty On Principles Governing The Activities Of States in the Exploration and Use of Outer Space including the Moon and Other Celestial Bodies’. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs, 1967, available at https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/treaties/introouterspacetreaty.html.
-
United Nations. ‘Agreement on the Rescue of Astronauts, the Return of Astronauts and the Return of Objects Launched into Outer Space’. United Nations Office for Outer Space Affairs. 3 December 1968, available at: https://www.unoosa.org/oosa/en/ourwork/spacelaw/treaties/rescueagreement.html.
-
United States 109th Congress, ‘S.1281 – National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2005 109th Congress (2005–2006). 2005, available at https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/senate-bill/1281/text.
-
United States Department of Defense. ‘Space Station: Agreement between the United States of America and Other Governments’. 29 January 1998, available at https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/12927-Multilateral-Space-Space-Station-1.29.1998.pdf.
-
United States Department Of Defense. ‘Department Of Defense And Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act. 2011’. available at: https://www.congress.gov/112/plaws/publ10/PLAW-112publ10.htm.
-
United States Director of National Intelligence. ‘Annual Threat Assessment of the US Intelligence Community’ 6 February2023, available at: https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/reports-publications/reports-publications-2023/item/2363-2023-annual-threat-assessment-of-the-u-s-intelligence-community.
-
United States Federal Aviation Administration. ‘U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration Order 8800.2 faa Commercial Space Astronaut Wings Program’ 20 July 2021, available at https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Order/FAA_Order_8800.2.pdf.
-
United States Mission Geneva. ‘Statement by Ambassador Wood: the threats posed by Russia and China to security of the outer space environment’, 2019, available at: https://geneva.usmission.gov/2019/08/14/statement-by-ambassador-wood-the-threats-posed-by-russia-and-china-to-security-of-the-outer-space-environment/.
-
United States National Space Policy. ‘Federal Register Vol. 85, No. 242’. 16 December 2020. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/12/16/2020-27892/the-national-space-policy.
-
Weinzierl, Matt, and Mehak Sarang. ‘The Commercial Space Age is Here.’ Harvard Business Review vol. 12. 2021, available at: https://hbr.org/2021/02/the-commercial-space-age-is-here.
-
Wendt, Alexander. ‘Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics’. International Organization vol. 46, no. 2 (1992), pp. 391–425.
-
White House. ‘United States Space Priorities Framework 2021’, 2021, available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/united-states-space-priorities-framework-_-december-1-2021.pdf.
-
White House. ‘United States Space Priorities Framework 2023’, 2023, available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/united-states-space-priorities-framework.pdf.
-
Whiting, Stephen N. ‘Space and Diplomacy: A New Tool for Leverage’. Astropolitics vol. 1, no. 1 (2003), pp. 54–77.
-
Zhao, Yun. ‘Legal Issues of China’s Possible Participation in the International Space Station: Comparing to the Russian Experience’. Journal of East Asia & International Law vol. 6 (2013), pp. 155–174.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 434 | 322 | 52 |
| Full Text Views | 35 | 32 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 103 | 88 | 5 |
Space Diplomacy and the International Space Station
In: European Review of International StudiesSearch for other papers by Laura Cashman in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sarah Liebermann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Debates regarding spacepower, and within this, what is meant by space diplomacy, are in their infancy. This article seeks to contribute to these academic discussions and reflects on the role of the International Space Station (iss) as an asset of space diplomacy. Although it has been showcased as a successful venture of multilateral science diplomacy, US structural power has ensured that it has first and foremost been a means to project US power and reward strategic partners. As the deadline for decommissioning looms, we argue that now is the time to consider the contributions the iss has made to space diplomacy and reflect on what will be lost when its life ends.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 434 | 322 | 52 |
| Full Text Views | 35 | 32 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 103 | 88 | 5 |