Save

Deontology, Consequentialism and Reciprocity in Contemporary Just War Thinking

In: European Review of International Studies
Author:
Chris Brown Department of International Relations, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK, C.J.Brown@lse.ac.uk

Search for other papers by Chris Brown in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

Abstract

There has always been a degree of tension between, on the one hand, the writings of philosophers, theologians and lawyers on the ethics of war, and, on the other, the moral approach of soldiers, those actually engaged in combat. The former base their thinking on deontological reasoning, albeit with occasional reluctant gestures towards notions such as ‘military necessity’, while the latter are by temperament consequentialist, stressing, in particular, the importance of reciprocity. This tension is controllable in the implausible context of war between liberal, Western European countries, but comes to the surface in situations where regular Western armies are in combat with the armed forces of non-liberal states, or in situations of asymmetric warfare. The question is posed – can the notion of a just war survive in the absence of reciprocity?

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 1625 241 13
Full Text Views 94 47 0
PDF Views & Downloads 208 90 1