Conjecture, Probabilism, and Provisional Knowledge in Renaissance Meteorology

In: Early Science and Medicine
View More View Less
  • 1 History Department, Oakland University, 372 O'Dowd Hall, Rochester, MI 48309, U.S.A.

Purchase instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

€29.95$34.95

Abstract

For Renaissance Aristotelian natural philosophers, ideally knowledge was certain and based on syllogistic demonstration. Many Italian scholars, such as Agostino Nifo, Pietro Pomponazzi, and Niccolò Cabeo, considered this ideal as inapplicable to the field of meteorology. Rather, because of the accidental nature of meteorological phenomena and the inherent irregularity of the weather, they believed that causal explanations of meteorology were largely conjectural, provisional, and probabilistic. Several of these natural philosophers applied the standard of "saving the appearances" to the field of meteorology because of the difficulties involved in making accurate observations. This lower epistemological standard contributed to the willingness of Aristotelians to revise meteorological theories and deviate from Aristotle's own positions.

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 145 65 9
Full Text Views 84 5 0
PDF Views & Downloads 26 10 0