Pascal versus Descartes on Solution of Geometrical Problems and the Sluse-Pascal Correspondence

in Early Science and Medicine
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

In this article, I examine the respective role of equations and construction in geometrical problem solving according to Descartes and Pascal. I argue that whereas Descartes claims that an equation provides a solution to a geometrical problem even if it leads to an entangled construction, Pascal dismisses this claim and gives priority to construction. To this end, I deal with prototypical problems like Apollonius’ problem of the three cir cles or Pappus’ problem, both of which were tackled by Descartes and Pascal in their work or correspondence. I also pay close attention to the cor respondence between Pascal and Sluse of October-December 1657 and compare Sluse’s conception of algebraic analysis in geometrical problem solving with Descartes’. These let ters, not thoroughly studied until now, supply an interesting discussion about what it is to provide a solution to a geomet rical problem. Finally, I consider Descartes’ algebraization of geometry as a kind of mathematization.

Pascal versus Descartes on Solution of Geometrical Problems and the Sluse-Pascal Correspondence

in Early Science and Medicine

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 10 10 4
Full Text Views 33 33 23
PDF Downloads 4 4 2
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0