Pascal versus Descartes on Solution of Geometrical Problems and the Sluse-Pascal Correspondence
In: Early Science and MedicineSearch for other papers by Sébastien Maronne in
Current site
Google Scholar
In this article, I examine the respective role of equations and construction in geometrical problem solving according to Descartes and Pascal. I argue that whereas Descartes claims that an equation provides a solution to a geometrical problem even if it leads to an entangled construction, Pascal dismisses this claim and gives priority to construction. To this end, I deal with prototypical problems like Apollonius’ problem of the three cir cles or Pappus’ problem, both of which were tackled by Descartes and Pascal in their work or correspondence. I also pay close attention to the cor respondence between Pascal and Sluse of October-December 1657 and compare Sluse’s conception of algebraic analysis in geometrical problem solving with Descartes’. These let ters, not thoroughly studied until now, supply an interesting discussion about what it is to provide a solution to a geomet rical problem. Finally, I consider Descartes’ algebraization of geometry as a kind of mathematization.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 403 | 65 | 19 |
| Full Text Views | 100 | 1 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 34 | 3 | 0 |
Pascal versus Descartes on Solution of Geometrical Problems and the Sluse-Pascal Correspondence
In: Early Science and MedicineSearch for other papers by Sébastien Maronne in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
In this article, I examine the respective role of equations and construction in geometrical problem solving according to Descartes and Pascal. I argue that whereas Descartes claims that an equation provides a solution to a geometrical problem even if it leads to an entangled construction, Pascal dismisses this claim and gives priority to construction. To this end, I deal with prototypical problems like Apollonius’ problem of the three cir cles or Pappus’ problem, both of which were tackled by Descartes and Pascal in their work or correspondence. I also pay close attention to the cor respondence between Pascal and Sluse of October-December 1657 and compare Sluse’s conception of algebraic analysis in geometrical problem solving with Descartes’. These let ters, not thoroughly studied until now, supply an interesting discussion about what it is to provide a solution to a geomet rical problem. Finally, I consider Descartes’ algebraization of geometry as a kind of mathematization.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 403 | 65 | 19 |
| Full Text Views | 100 | 1 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 34 | 3 | 0 |