Roman vs. Arabic Computistics in Twelfth-Century England: A Newly Discovered Source (Collatio Compoti Romani et Arabici)


in Early Science and Medicine
Restricted Access
Get Access to Full Text
Rent on DeepDyve

Have an Access Token?



Enter your access token to activate and access content online.

Please login and go to your personal user account to enter your access token.



Help

Have Institutional Access?



Access content through your institution. Any other coaching guidance?



Connect

A frequently overlooked aspect of the knowledge transfer from Arabic into Latin in the twelfth century is the introduction of the Islamo-Arabic calendar, which confronted Western computists with a radically different scheme of lunar reckoning that was in some ways superior to the 19-year lunar cycle of the Roman Church. One of the earliest sources to properly discuss this new system and compare it to the old one is the anonymous Collatio Compoti Romani et Arabici, found in a manuscript from Tewkesbury Abbey, Gloucestershire. This article contains the first edition and translation of this previously unknown text, preceded by an analysis of its content and sources. As will be argued, the text was written in the second quarter of the twelfth century as a reaction to the astronomical tables of al-Khwārizmī, recently translated by Adelard of Bath, as well as to eclipse observations that had exposed the flaws of the ‘Roman’ computation.


Early Science and Medicine

A Journal for the Study of Science, Technology and Medicine in the Pre-modern Period

Sections

References

9

C.P.E. Nothaft, “The Reception and Application of Arabic Science in Twelfth-Century Computistics: New Evidence from Bavaria,” Journal for the History of Astronomy,45 (2014), 35–60, at 37–39.

15

See the list provided in Mercier, “Astronomical Tables,” 116–118.

22

Isidore of Seville, Etymologies 3.58–59, ed. G. Gasparotto and J.-Y. Guillaumin (Paris, 2009), 121; Isidore of Seville, De natura rerum 20–21, ed. Jacques Fontaine (Bordeaux, 1960), 247–253; Macrobius, Commentarii in Somnium Scipionis 1.15.11, ed. James Willis, 2nd ed. (Stuttgart, 1970), 62; Martianus Capella, De nuptiis Philologiae et Mercurii 8.869–870, ed. James Willis (Stuttgart, 1983), 329.

27

L.C. Bethmann, ed., “Chronicon S. Andreae Castri Cameracesii,” in MGH Scriptores, vol. 7, ed. Georg Heinrich Pertz (Hannover, 1846), 326–550, at 550: “Quae res cum omnium mentes admiratione simul ac stupore concuteret, quidam quasi prudentiores eclipsim solis ex oppositione lunae dicebant accidisse. Quod nequaquam fieri posse, ratio patet – solem scilicet eclipsim a luna, nisi in interlunio, pati posse – : cum constet, ea die lunam 27am fuisse. Quidam vero probabilius asserebant, hoc signum tenebrarum aliquid novi prodigii presignare. Dictum est multo post a redeuntibus de Hierusalem, ipsa die, ea hora tenebrarum, quadringentos quinque minus milites de templo a Sarracenis trans flumen esse peremptos. Nec mirum, si in suorum membrorum occisione placuerit Deo tenebras mundo inducere, in cuius morte solem et totum mundum constat obtenebratum fuisse.” On ‘miraculous’ eclipses in medieval chronicles, see Umberto dall’Olmo, “Eclypsis naturalis ed Eclypsis prodigialis nelle cronache medioevali,” Organon,15 (1979), 153–166; Robert Bartlett, The Natural and the Supernatural in the Middle Ages (Cambridge, 2008), 51–70.

Information

Content Metrics

Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 55 55 6
Full Text Views 6 6 6
PDF Downloads 1 1 1
EPUB Downloads 0 0 0