Save

The Nature of Blood: Debating Haematology and Blood Chemistry in the Eighteenth-Century Dutch Republic


In: Early Science and Medicine
Author:
Ruben E. Verwaal University of Groningen
r.e.verwaal@rug.nl


Search for other papers by Ruben E. Verwaal in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
Download Citation Get Permissions

Access options

Get access to the full article by using one of the access options below.

Institutional Login

Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials

Login via Institution

Purchase

Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):

$40.00

What is blood? Despite William Harvey’s discovery of the circulation of blood, many questions about blood itself remained unanswered. This article asks how and why Dutch medical men in the early eighteenth century initiated studies to understand the properties of blood. Medical professors analysed blood in chemical laboratories, as they believed that blood chemistry promoted new understandings of human physiology and pathology. Others, however, grew to be deeply sceptical about chemistry and argued that there existed a discrepancy between blood in vitro and blood in vivo. They preferred quantitative measurements, hoping that these would provide useful knowledge for making diagnoses and treating wounds. This article analyses these competing approaches to blood research, arguing that the discussion went beyond the problem of methodology and was directly linked to the question of blood’s essential yet disputed quality: was blood alive?


Content Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 161 0 0
Full Text Views 463 54 5
PDF Views & Downloads 449 74 6