Criticism of Authority in the Writings of Moses Maimonides and Fakhr Al-Din Al-Razi
In: Early Science and MedicineSearch for other papers by Y. Tzvi Langermann in
Current site
Google Scholar
Abstract
Criticism of authority was a prominent feature of medieval philosophical writing. In this study the critiques of two contemporaneous scholars, Moses Maimonides and Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, are compared. Maimonides criticized Hellenistic authorities, mainly Aristotle. However, the starting point for his critique was Aristotle's admission of the limitations of his own inquiries. Maimonides admired Aristotle's questioning of his own conclusions; indeed, his own thought was characterized by constant self-doubt. Al-Rāzī criticized an earlier Muslim scholar, Ibn Sīnā (Avicenna), an intellectual giant whose imprint was strongly felt in philosophy and medicine. Al Rāzī used his commentaries on a number of Ibn Sīnā's books as a stage for criticizing the master and for arguing for his own, alternative viewpoints.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 431 | 46 | 8 |
| Full Text Views | 168 | 3 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 89 | 12 | 6 |
Criticism of Authority in the Writings of Moses Maimonides and Fakhr Al-Din Al-Razi
In: Early Science and MedicineSearch for other papers by Y. Tzvi Langermann in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
Abstract
Criticism of authority was a prominent feature of medieval philosophical writing. In this study the critiques of two contemporaneous scholars, Moses Maimonides and Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, are compared. Maimonides criticized Hellenistic authorities, mainly Aristotle. However, the starting point for his critique was Aristotle's admission of the limitations of his own inquiries. Maimonides admired Aristotle's questioning of his own conclusions; indeed, his own thought was characterized by constant self-doubt. Al-Rāzī criticized an earlier Muslim scholar, Ibn Sīnā (Avicenna), an intellectual giant whose imprint was strongly felt in philosophy and medicine. Al Rāzī used his commentaries on a number of Ibn Sīnā's books as a stage for criticizing the master and for arguing for his own, alternative viewpoints.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 431 | 46 | 8 |
| Full Text Views | 168 | 3 | 2 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 89 | 12 | 6 |