International fisheries governance contains no specific provisions detailing States’ rights and obligations in respect of fisheries in maritime zones classified as falling under the sovereignty of coastal States, namely: internal waters, archipelagic waters and territorial seas. Using a case-study of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission, this article demonstrates that there is still a gap in international fisheries governance relating to fisheries in ‘waters under sovereignty’ which requires remedying, and concludes by providing some possible management options to fill the gap.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
Churchill and Lowe, supra note 4, 122; M. Tsamenyi, C. Schofield and B. Milligan, “Navigation through Archipelagos: Current State Practice” in M. Nordquist, T. Koh and J. Moore (eds), Freedom of Seas, Passage Rights and the 1982 Law of the Sea Convention (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff 2009) pp. 413–454. See also G. Boyles and P. Woodward, South Pacific Region Maritime Limits Map (South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission, Suva, Fiji and Pacific Islands Forum Fisheries Agency, Honiara, Solomon Islands 1995); WCPFC Secretariat, Convention Map for the Convention on the Conservation and Management of Highly Migratory Fish Stocks in the Western and Central Pacific Ocean (WCPFC 2005); available at www.wcpfc.int/.
Churchill and Lowe, supra note 4, 122.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 476 | 81 | 5 |
Full Text Views | 160 | 16 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 178 | 38 | 2 |
International fisheries governance contains no specific provisions detailing States’ rights and obligations in respect of fisheries in maritime zones classified as falling under the sovereignty of coastal States, namely: internal waters, archipelagic waters and territorial seas. Using a case-study of the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Commission, this article demonstrates that there is still a gap in international fisheries governance relating to fisheries in ‘waters under sovereignty’ which requires remedying, and concludes by providing some possible management options to fill the gap.
All Time | Past Year | Past 30 Days | |
---|---|---|---|
Abstract Views | 476 | 81 | 5 |
Full Text Views | 160 | 16 | 2 |
PDF Views & Downloads | 178 | 38 | 2 |