The Rights of States over Low-tide Elevations: A Legal Analysis
In: The International Journal of Marine and Coastal LawSearch for other papers by Roberto Lavalle in
Current site
Google Scholar
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea takes low-tide elevations into account only by endowing them with the capacity to generate specific maritime areas, by themselves, whenever they lie within territorial seas, and, subject to certain conditions, when they are part of straight baselines. But it passes over in silence the question whether and what rights states have over these maritime features. In a 2001 judgment, the International Court of Justice has held that in general low-tide elevations are under the sovereignty of the coastal states if they lie within their territorial seas, while, in a 2012 judgment, it has held that low-tide elevations cannot be appropriated, which seems to leave those features out of the ken of the law if they are located in exclusive economic zones. But, strictly speaking, in expressing such views, the Court cannot be deemed to have laid down customary law. It seems, however, that compelling reasons can be found, some of which are derived from the above-mentioned Convention, for considering that, except for low-tide elevations located on the high seas, states have certain rights over all low-tide elevations.
Purchase
Buy instant access (PDF download and unlimited online access):
Institutional Login
Log in with Open Athens, Shibboleth, or your institutional credentials
Personal login
Log in with your brill.com account
-
26
Given the state of the law of the sea in 1953, it may be difficult to see what rights, other than those of full sovereignty, states could exercise over the features in question.
-
46
By a judgment of October 2007, the Court settled a case, brought by Nicaragua against Honduras, that combined maritime delimitation and sovereignty over maritime features, but those features turned out to consist only of islands. Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras [2007] icj Rep 659, paras. 137 and 144.)
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1219 | 119 | 23 |
| Full Text Views | 285 | 6 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 163 | 18 | 2 |
The Rights of States over Low-tide Elevations: A Legal Analysis
In: The International Journal of Marine and Coastal LawSearch for other papers by Roberto Lavalle in
Current site
Google Scholar
PubMed
The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea takes low-tide elevations into account only by endowing them with the capacity to generate specific maritime areas, by themselves, whenever they lie within territorial seas, and, subject to certain conditions, when they are part of straight baselines. But it passes over in silence the question whether and what rights states have over these maritime features. In a 2001 judgment, the International Court of Justice has held that in general low-tide elevations are under the sovereignty of the coastal states if they lie within their territorial seas, while, in a 2012 judgment, it has held that low-tide elevations cannot be appropriated, which seems to leave those features out of the ken of the law if they are located in exclusive economic zones. But, strictly speaking, in expressing such views, the Court cannot be deemed to have laid down customary law. It seems, however, that compelling reasons can be found, some of which are derived from the above-mentioned Convention, for considering that, except for low-tide elevations located on the high seas, states have certain rights over all low-tide elevations.
| All Time | Past 365 days | Past 30 Days | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abstract Views | 1219 | 119 | 23 |
| Full Text Views | 285 | 6 | 0 |
| PDF Views & Downloads | 163 | 18 | 2 |